2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.

Aftermarket Intake Manifolds?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 18, 2003 | 01:22 AM
  #1  
kim307's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 490
Likes: 0
From: San Jose, CA
Aftermarket Intake Manifolds?

Are there any companies or individuals that makes intake manifolds for 13BT?

Seems like the IM is the biggest bottle neck for 2nd gen 13BTs, especially the S4.

Jay Kim
Reply
Old Oct 18, 2003 | 01:25 AM
  #2  
black_sunshine's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 20 Years
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 206
Likes: 0
From: Springfield, MO
Aside from what Mazdatrix and some other various companies (racing beat) offer, I don't know of any. You should have a custom one fabbed out of aluminum tubing!
Reply
Old Oct 18, 2003 | 09:44 AM
  #3  
Aaron Cake's Avatar
Engine, Not Motor
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 29,798
Likes: 128
From: London, Ontario, Canada
The biggest bottleneck for the engine are the ports. Intake is not really an issue.

There are many NA aftermarket intakes in the form of carb (don't go there) based kits, and the IDA style dual throttle body intake. Many of then are suitable for race only.
Reply
Old Oct 18, 2003 | 09:47 AM
  #4  
KNONFS's Avatar
B O R I C U A
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 5,482
Likes: 36
From: VA
Re: Aftermarket Intake Manifolds?

Originally posted by kim307
Are there any companies or individuals that makes intake manifolds for 13BT?

Seems like the IM is the biggest bottle neck for 2nd gen 13BTs, especially the S4.

Jay Kim
In my experience a intake manifold with carb (and I asumme even more with a stand alone system) WILL yield more power than a full exhaust system on NA's.

BTW - Jay Tech also "used" to make AWESOME manifolds, etc.

Last edited by KNONFS; Oct 18, 2003 at 09:53 AM.
Reply
Old Oct 18, 2003 | 11:09 AM
  #5  
mazdaspeed7's Avatar
mad scientist
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 2,665
Likes: 2
From: Savannah, GA
Originally posted by Aaron Cake
The biggest bottleneck for the engine are the ports. Intake is not really an issue.

There are many NA aftermarket intakes in the form of carb (don't go there) based kits, and the IDA style dual throttle body intake. Many of then are suitable for race only.
What do you have to back that up?
Reply
Old Oct 18, 2003 | 11:42 AM
  #6  
hondasuck's Avatar
DO IT IN DA BUTT
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 412
Likes: 0
From: rx heaven
http://12.232.38.41/WebSite/Products...sp?intView=100
Reply
Old Oct 18, 2003 | 11:44 AM
  #7  
wpgrexx's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,350
Likes: 0
From: not in winterpeg anymore
Originally posted by Aaron Cake
The biggest bottleneck for the engine are the ports. Intake is not really an issue.

There are many NA aftermarket intakes in the form of carb (don't go there) based kits, and the IDA style dual throttle body intake. Many of then are suitable for race only.
why do you hate carbs so much?have you had bed experience or something?
Reply
Old Oct 18, 2003 | 12:20 PM
  #8  
RotaryRevn's Avatar
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 2,410
Likes: 2
There are plenty of people that make aftermarket intake manifolds the 13bt motors but you need to look to the land down under (Australia). I can probably dig up some pics with some links if you are really interested.
Reply
Old Oct 18, 2003 | 12:30 PM
  #9  
fastrotaries's Avatar
W. TX chirpin Monkey
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 2,684
Likes: 0
From: Mesquite, TX
Originally posted by mazdaspeed7
What do you have to back that up?
EXPERIENCE!

you can drive them on the street, but cold starts and such become a pain, amongst other little details.

If you're really concerned with the intake manifold sizing. Then port it out, or get it extrude honed.
Reply
Old Oct 18, 2003 | 12:31 PM
  #10  
RoninAutoBoX's Avatar
Old School Rotors
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 883
Likes: 0
From: South Florida
I love those aftermarket fuel injection throttle body designs. You can pick up manifold/throttle body sets off of EBay for like $500. That is where I am getting mine from. They are Australian folks.
Reply
Old Oct 18, 2003 | 12:41 PM
  #11  
mazdaspeed7's Avatar
mad scientist
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 2,665
Likes: 2
From: Savannah, GA
Originally posted by fastrotaries
EXPERIENCE!

you can drive them on the street, but cold starts and such become a pain, amongst other little details.

If you're really concerned with the intake manifold sizing. Then port it out, or get it extrude honed.
I was not referring to carbs. I will never have a carbed car. I was referring to Aaron Cakes statement that the ports are the restriction on a n/a, instead of the intake manifold. Thats simply ignorant. Its an overgeneral conclusion that leaves so many other variables its not even funny. He is assuming the ONLY thing preventing 6 port motors from makign power is the ports. If that was the case, you would see very large gains from porting, but very little from everything else, including exhaust, intake, etc. Thats totally opposite of how it actually is.
Reply
Old Oct 18, 2003 | 12:50 PM
  #12  
KNONFS's Avatar
B O R I C U A
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 5,482
Likes: 36
From: VA
Originally posted by fastrotaries
If you're really concerned with the intake manifold sizing. Then port it out, or get it extrude honed.
I am 100% sure that you know that is not that easy!
Reply
Old Oct 18, 2003 | 12:52 PM
  #13  
Liquid Anarchy's Avatar
We come with the Hardcore
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 2,456
Likes: 0
From: Springfield, MO
If you could get your hands on a 13B-RE intake manifold, you'd never have to worry about it being a bottleneck again.
Reply
Old Oct 18, 2003 | 01:37 PM
  #14  
Aaron Cake's Avatar
Engine, Not Motor
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 29,798
Likes: 128
From: London, Ontario, Canada
What I mean is that before you start looking at replacing a (very well designed) intake manifold, you should look at porting the engine so you can actually benefit from the intake swap. Sure, changing the intake on a stock port car will obviously result in some power gain, but without the porting, it will be less then optimal (and thus, for the price and PITA factor, probably not worth it).

For the record, I don't hate carbs. I just believe that fuel injection has so many advantages over carb setups that I wouldn't even consider swapping "backwards" from EFI to carb. Even mechanical fuel injection (ie. Bosch K Jetronic) is superior in many ways.
Reply
Old Oct 18, 2003 | 03:47 PM
  #15  
NZConvertible's Avatar
I'm a boost creep...
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 15,608
Likes: 8
From: Auckland, New Zealand
For those who missed it, the question was about manifolds for the 13BT, not the 6-port NA.

Nobody makes complete custom intake manifolds. What the Aussies often do is assemble one using a Weber manifold, an IDA throttle body and a custom-made barrel plenum.

There's no reason why anyone couldn't do that without buying from Australia. The only custom part is the plenum.

And to back up Aaron, I've seen 500hp FC 13BT's using the stock manifold and TB bolted to a ported engine.
Reply
Old Oct 18, 2003 | 03:57 PM
  #16  
kim307's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 490
Likes: 0
From: San Jose, CA
I've known about the carb'd setups for a while, but I would like this to be a step forward for my 7 not a step backward. I mean that in both performance, gas mileage and technology.

What makes RX-7 so much more complicated than, let's say....a Honda Prelude or Acura GSR intake manifold with dual runner lengths and aux ports, just like 6-port n/a?

Is there a reason why a simple, well-thought-out, sheet metal, log style manifold won't work on rotaries?

Jay Kim
Reply
Old Oct 18, 2003 | 04:52 PM
  #17  
NZConvertible's Avatar
I'm a boost creep...
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 15,608
Likes: 8
From: Auckland, New Zealand
The reason no-one makes then has got nothing to do with the fact that it's a rotary, it's simply that the demand is not there for mass-production like there is with Honda manifolds.

There's no reason you can't make your own, but remember that inlet manifold design is not as simple as it looks. It's quite easy to go backwards in performance if you stuff it up.
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2003 | 02:37 AM
  #18  
kim307's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 490
Likes: 0
From: San Jose, CA
Originally posted by NZConvertible
The reason no-one makes then has got nothing to do with the fact that it's a rotary, it's simply that the demand is not there for mass-production like there is with Honda manifolds.

There's no reason you can't make your own, but remember that inlet manifold design is not as simple as it looks. It's quite easy to go backwards in performance if you stuff it up.
K, that was the answer that I was looking for. I figured because of the lack of demand.

Another question...are the bolt patterns the same for the intake manifolds for 13BT and 13B-REW?

Jay Kim
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2003 | 02:55 AM
  #19  
Turblown's Avatar
Turn up the boost
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 7,174
Likes: 236
From: Twin Cities, MN
http://www.rotorworx.com.au/perfor_manifolds.html
__________________
Rotary Performance Parts


Reply
Old Oct 19, 2003 | 03:04 AM
  #20  
kim307's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 490
Likes: 0
From: San Jose, CA
$750 for a IM? Wow that's expensive.

Are there any other companies that are proven to make power down there in AU? And maybe a little cheaper?

Jay Kim

Last edited by kim307; Oct 19, 2003 at 03:13 AM.
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2003 | 04:01 AM
  #21  
RoninAutoBoX's Avatar
Old School Rotors
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 883
Likes: 0
From: South Florida
Originally posted by kim307
$750 for a IM? Wow that's expensive.

Are there any other companies that are proven to make power down there in AU? And maybe a little cheaper?

Jay Kim
Check out E-Bay, there is a group os Aussies that sell a complete intake manifold/fuel injection throttle body kit for about $500 buy-it-now. They also have all sorts of accessories for the project too, but thise most certainly requires a standalone ECU.

You may sacrifice a little in drivability though. you are talking about 2 throttle plates that feed all four ports at the same time, it will not be progressive like a carb that has primaries and secondaries(although this effect is really only drastic on 6 port engines).
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2003 | 04:32 AM
  #22  
NZConvertible's Avatar
I'm a boost creep...
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 15,608
Likes: 8
From: Auckland, New Zealand
Originally posted by kim307
...are the bolt patterns the same for the intake manifolds for 13BT and 13B-REW?
Doesn't work. The runner angles on the FD LIM don't match the ports of the FC engine. You can (with a bit of work) bolt an FD UIM to a S5 LIM. The S4 doesn't work very well. You won't see huge gains from this unless you're already making a lot of power.

Originally posted by RoninAutoBoX
...it will not be progressive like a carb that has primaries and secondaries
Just like the stock TB you mean...
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2003 | 05:07 AM
  #23  
kim307's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 490
Likes: 0
From: San Jose, CA
If I were to have a product similar to the one by RotorX and sell it for $300-400 would there be enough interest?

Of course that's only if these RotorX things prove their worthiness on a flow bench.

I wonder if RotorX had them flowtested and even better, sonic tested.

Jay Kim
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2003 | 10:34 AM
  #24  
wpgrexx's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,350
Likes: 0
From: not in winterpeg anymore
I think the testing is what is holding alot of people back. Sure I could go into my garage and fabricate a log style plenum and make it look really cool. But will it flow properly, let alone as good or better than a stock manifold.

Once you've made this manifold, who is going to flow test it. By the time all the testing and dyno time has been done, you have to selli t for 700 just to cover all the research costs.
Reply
Old Oct 20, 2003 | 02:37 AM
  #25  
NZConvertible's Avatar
I'm a boost creep...
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 15,608
Likes: 8
From: Auckland, New Zealand
Originally posted by kim307
Of course that's only if these RotorX things prove their worthiness on a flow bench.
I'd rather they prove their worthiness on the engine than on a flowbench. That's what counts. They have a fairly good reputation in Oz, so their 30rwkW (40rwhp) claim shouldn't be ignored, although that would apply to a modified engine, not a stock one.

BTW, that plenum is A$745, or US$514. Loose the chrome and it's probably cheaper.
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:47 PM.