2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.

Adivce on buying a series IV with Auto trans

Old Sep 14, 2007 | 08:31 AM
  #1  
McOz's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newbie
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
From: Australia
Adivce on buying a series IV with Auto trans

G'day Folks,

I'm looking to buy a new 'toy' - something relatively cheap but fast and with decent handling that I can take to my local car club and get involved in some track days with.

To this end I'm looking at a Series IV 13B turbo Rx7 tomorrow. My issue is - it's got an automatic (though with a stage 2 shift kit) transmission. I've never driven an auto in anything approaching anger before, and I'm not sure if it's going to leave me wanting.

Excuse my naivety, but can you still drift / power slide / burnout just as easily on an auto? Are there any armature racers out there with experience on both an auto and manual who could provide me with an objective opinion?

If it helps, the specs as advertised are:
MAZDA Series 4 RX7, 13B turbo, 150,000km, p/s, a/c, p/w, p/m, microtech computer, turbo smart BOV, boost controll, Apexi pod filter & turbo timer, auto meter boost guage, full exhaust with twin canons, new $2000 fully re-built race auto g/box, stage 2 shift kit, lowered, 17" mags, $4000 stereo custom boot installed.

Cheers,
McOz
Reply
Old Sep 14, 2007 | 08:43 AM
  #2  
niburu's Avatar
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 2,228
Likes: 2
From: Richmond, VA
don't do it, that slush box will never keep up with the manual trans version, period
might be a good daily driver, lousy competion car
Reply
Old Sep 14, 2007 | 01:02 PM
  #3  
RX7MAVEN's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 155
Likes: 0
From: NAPLES, FLORIDA
The automatic saps the performance out of a NA and holds up poorly if mated to a turbo. Drive both trannys and you will NOT buy the automatic.
Reply
Old Sep 14, 2007 | 01:35 PM
  #4  
micah's Avatar
Winter sucks
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 3,083
Likes: 0
From: Newberg, Oregon
Performance hits aside.... the automatic for the FC is a terrible transmission and WILL NOT hold up to track abuse. PERIOD.
Reply
Old Sep 14, 2007 | 02:51 PM
  #5  
InsomniacFC's Avatar
Will drive for parts
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,252
Likes: 0
From: Modesto, CA
Save your cash and buy one with a manual because you'll be back on here in a few months looking up "auto to manual conversion".
Reply
Old Sep 14, 2007 | 08:26 PM
  #6  
McOz's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newbie
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
From: Australia
Cheers folks, appreciate the feedback. Going to look at the car now, but suscpect my wallet will be staying in my pocket for this one.
Reply
Old Sep 14, 2007 | 09:31 PM
  #7  
McOz's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newbie
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
From: Australia
UPDATE: The seller and his car never turned up. Time to hit the classifieds.
Reply
Old Sep 15, 2007 | 12:44 AM
  #8  
Stanis's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 431
Likes: 2
From: Ocala, FL
Originally Posted by RX7MAVEN
The automatic saps the performance out of a NA and holds up poorly if mated to a turbo. Drive both trannys and you will NOT buy the automatic.
The N/A auto tranny is complete crap and that is a given. Now you say mated to a turbo like Mazda just ***** nilly used an N/A auto trans with their turbo motors. They are two different trannys from what I've seen. Bolt up the auto from the 20b and you will be ok. If they were the same, I don't see the trans holding up past 20k miles, if that.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Sobr609
20B Forum
8
Feb 11, 2019 03:19 PM
plentymoon
NW RX-7 Forum
4
Sep 5, 2015 08:55 AM
IB Cristina
West RX-7 Forum
0
Aug 20, 2015 05:46 PM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:40 PM.