2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.

87 vs 93.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 2, 2008 | 10:55 PM
  #26  
Mr.FC3s's Avatar
Rotard
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 173
Likes: 0
From: Elgin IL
is it a myth? in my 7 when I ran 93 the under hood temps were way higher than usual. IIRC 93 burns slower and is more resistant to detonation under higher compression (or boost) so in theory am I right? or has anyone else noticed this with 93 on an N/A?
Reply
Old Dec 3, 2008 | 06:22 PM
  #27  
Evil Aviator's Avatar
Rotorhead
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 9,136
Likes: 39
From: Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
Originally Posted by Mr.FC3s
is it a myth?
Yes, the burn rate is independent of the octane rating.

Originally Posted by Mr.FC3s
in my 7 when I ran 93 the under hood temps were way higher than usual.
All RX-7's are red, and I can even show you a picture of my convertible to prove it.

Originally Posted by Mr.FC3s
IIRC 93 burns slower and is more resistant to detonation under higher compression (or boost) so in theory am I right?
93 octane is more resistant to detonation than lower octane fuel, but it does not necessarily burn slower. There is a difference between burning and detonating.

See this article for more info:
http://www.ducatimeccanica.com/gas.html
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
twinturboy
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
14
Jan 13, 2006 07:11 AM
riddlemr2
Suspension/Wheels/Tires/Brakes
3
Mar 7, 2004 10:44 PM
Kydo
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
4
Feb 6, 2004 12:30 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:47 AM.