2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.
Sponsored by:

411 rear end

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-31-05, 12:12 AM
  #1  
FC4ME

Thread Starter
 
90WhiteVrt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 1,079
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
411 rear end

I currently have a 90 convertible. I believe it runs a 383 in the rear or something like that. I'm wondering if a 411 that came from an FB would fit in my 90 convertible?
90WhiteVrt is offline  
Old 08-31-05, 12:16 AM
  #2  
...94% correct.

 
Makenzie71's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: High Texas
Posts: 1,283
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
no...but the 430 from a TII will fit...well, you might have to get some other trinkets, too, but I can't remember.
Makenzie71 is offline  
Old 08-31-05, 12:46 AM
  #3  
Former Moderator. RIP Icemark.
 
Icemark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Rohnert Park CA
Posts: 25,896
Likes: 0
Received 19 Likes on 19 Posts
Originally Posted by Makenzie71
no...but the 430 from a TII will fit...well, you might have to get some other trinkets, too, but I can't remember.
Huh???

The stock rear end gearing on a all Turbos is 4.11, the same as for all 89 and later Convertibles.

Add in that the Turbo uses a 8 inch diff and the convertible uses the standard non turbo 7 inch diff. well the diff wouldn't even fit. You'd have to change the whole assembly which would require a custom drive shaft, and turbo half shafts to use a Turbo diff assembly on a Non turbo car.

The only North American FC with a 4.3 rear end gear was the 89-90 GTUs model.

Last edited by Icemark; 08-31-05 at 12:49 AM.
Icemark is offline  
Old 08-31-05, 12:47 AM
  #4  
Former Moderator. RIP Icemark.
 
Icemark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Rohnert Park CA
Posts: 25,896
Likes: 0
Received 19 Likes on 19 Posts
Originally Posted by 90WhiteVrt
I currently have a 90 convertible. I believe it runs a 383 in the rear or something like that. I'm wondering if a 411 that came from an FB would fit in my 90 convertible?
No, the FB uses a 6 inch differntial.

And as mentioned above the 89+ verts all had a 4.11 rear end gear.

Of course this information can be found in the Standard Features and Options sticky thread found at the top of this section.
Icemark is offline  
Old 08-31-05, 12:48 AM
  #5  
...94% correct.

 
Makenzie71's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: High Texas
Posts: 1,283
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by Icemark
Huh???

The stock rear end gearing on a all Turbos is 4.11, the same as for all 89 and later Convertibles.

Add in that the Turbo uses a 8 inch diff and the convertible uses the standard non turbo 7 inch diff.

The only North American FC with a 4.3 rear end gear was the 89-90 GTUs model.
I stand corrected...confused FC's with MA71's for a second...
Makenzie71 is offline  
Old 08-31-05, 12:50 AM
  #6  
Former Moderator. RIP Icemark.
 
Icemark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Rohnert Park CA
Posts: 25,896
Likes: 0
Received 19 Likes on 19 Posts
Originally Posted by Makenzie71
I stand corrected...confused FC's with MA71's for a second...
what the heck is a MA71??? A supra or something???
Icemark is offline  
Old 08-31-05, 12:52 AM
  #7  
...94% correct.

 
Makenzie71's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: High Texas
Posts: 1,283
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
A supra or something? Not just a supra...but the coolest kind...

(minus that whole headgasket thing)
Makenzie71 is offline  
Old 08-31-05, 12:53 AM
  #8  
Former Moderator. RIP Icemark.
 
Icemark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Rohnert Park CA
Posts: 25,896
Likes: 0
Received 19 Likes on 19 Posts
Originally Posted by Makenzie71
A supra or something? Not just a supra...but the coolest kind...

(minus that whole headgasket thing)
what year/model??? Isn't that the lame third gen car??
Icemark is offline  
Old 08-31-05, 12:58 AM
  #9  
...94% correct.

 
Makenzie71's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: High Texas
Posts: 1,283
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
...text sucks for context, assumed sarcasm...

The MA70 and MA71 Supras for the MKIII variety, the MA70 starting in 1986 and the MA71 in 1987 (much like the FC). The MA70 is the 7m-GE powered N/A model, and the MA71 is the 7m-GTE turbo.

Lame? They're faster that RX-7's.:p
Makenzie71 is offline  
Old 08-31-05, 01:03 AM
  #10  
Former Moderator. RIP Icemark.
 
Icemark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Rohnert Park CA
Posts: 25,896
Likes: 0
Received 19 Likes on 19 Posts
Originally Posted by Makenzie71
...text sucks for context, assumed sarcasm...

The MA70 and MA71 Supras for the MKIII variety, the MA70 starting in 1986 and the MA71 in 1987 (much like the FC). The MA70 is the 7m-GE powered N/A model, and the MA71 is the 7m-GTE turbo.

Lame? They're faster that RX-7's.:p
well since we have already crapped all over this thread...

Faster??? who cares??? There will always be at least one car faster than anything I can own.

But those 3rd gen Supras... They still weigh about the same as my V6 extra cab Tacoma... And handle about the same too.
Icemark is offline  
Old 08-31-05, 01:08 AM
  #11  
...94% correct.

 
Makenzie71's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: High Texas
Posts: 1,283
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by Icemark
well since we have already crapped all over this thread...

Faster??? who cares??? There will always be at least one car faster than anything I can own.

But those 3rd gen Supras... They still weigh about the same as my V6 extra cab Tacoma... And handle about the same too.
there's no adequate raspberry smiley...

The third gens were only 100lbs heavier than the average 4th...and only 500 more pounds than the FC...may seem like a lot until you factor in that the NA's had more power than TII's, and the turbo's had a top-end remeniscent of my TL1000S.

Mine was a tremendous pig...scraped and cut and chopped and gutted and got her down to a meager 3400lbs, wet...bleh. But topping out at 155mph in an NA isn't that bad. The two cars are, ultimately, incomparable...designed for vastly different things. That's why I liked having both.

The MKII, however...that was the last REAL Supra...


ahhhhh...boob...you keep editing and adding more shiznit...my '89 handled remarkably well. Good suspension and sticky tires will let her hang with just about anything up to about 80mph...then that whole "intertia" thing starts taking hold...
Makenzie71 is offline  
Old 08-31-05, 01:16 AM
  #12  
FC4ME

Thread Starter
 
90WhiteVrt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 1,079
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
so then would the 89-90 gtu 4.3 fit directly into my convertible?
90WhiteVrt is offline  
Old 08-31-05, 04:56 AM
  #13  
I'm a boost creep...

 
NZConvertible's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 15,608
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Originally Posted by Makenzie71
Lame? They're faster that RX-7's.
I can just remember back far enough to when the FC RX-7 Turbos consistently beat the Mk.III Supra Turbos in the Australian Production Car Championship...

And since the original question has already been thoroughly and correctly answered, it can't really be crapped on.
NZConvertible is offline  
Old 08-31-05, 06:08 AM
  #14  
Lives on the Forum

 
RETed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: n
Posts: 26,664
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 15 Posts
Lesse...7MGE, 200hp; 7MGTE, 222hp.
Wow, what a difference a turbo makes! :P

BTW, you sure the FC rear end ratio is "4.11" and not "4.10"?
I always thought it was 41 ring gear teeth and 10 pinion teeth?

4.33 -> 39 ring gear teeth, 9 pinion teeth
3.90 -> 39 ring gear teeth, 10 pinion teeth


-Ted
RETed is offline  
Old 08-31-05, 09:48 AM
  #15  
...94% correct.

 
Makenzie71's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: High Texas
Posts: 1,283
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by NZConvertible
I can just remember back far enough to when the FC RX-7 Turbos consistently beat the Mk.III Supra Turbos in the Australian Production Car Championship...
That's what happens when you pit a GT car against a sport on the track with similar power. The FD's did it with the MKIV's, too, and the MKIV's were throwing down almost 100 more wheel hp.
Makenzie71 is offline  
Old 08-31-05, 10:12 AM
  #16  
Former Moderator. RIP Icemark.
 
Icemark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Rohnert Park CA
Posts: 25,896
Likes: 0
Received 19 Likes on 19 Posts
Originally Posted by Makenzie71
The MKII, however...that was the last REAL Supra......
Hey we finally agree... yeah the MA6X/RA6X series was the last real Celica too
Icemark is offline  
Old 08-31-05, 10:23 AM
  #17  
Former Moderator. RIP Icemark.
 
Icemark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Rohnert Park CA
Posts: 25,896
Likes: 0
Received 19 Likes on 19 Posts
Originally Posted by RETed
BTW, you sure the FC rear end ratio is "4.11" and not "4.10"?
I always thought it was 41 ring gear teeth and 10 pinion teeth?

4.33 -> 39 ring gear teeth, 9 pinion teeth
3.90 -> 39 ring gear teeth, 10 pinion teeth


-Ted
Yep, you caught me ted... they are 4.10 not 4.11
Icemark is offline  
Old 08-31-05, 10:26 AM
  #18  
FC4ME

Thread Starter
 
90WhiteVrt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 1,079
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
yall totally killed me thread
90WhiteVrt is offline  
Old 08-31-05, 10:37 AM
  #19  
NASA geek

iTrader: (2)
 
RacerXtreme7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Virginia
Posts: 2,215
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
ANY N/A FC rear diff are interchangable, so YES the 89-91 GTUs 4.3 gear set will work (I sold my 4.3 set to SAMPS, who installed it into his vert) in your vert. BUT GOOD LUCK FINDING THE 4.3 GTUs diff for sale anywere. You can get them through mazdacomp and mazda trix as well NEW for a heafty price.

~Mike.........
RacerXtreme7 is offline  
Old 08-31-05, 10:47 AM
  #20  
Former Moderator. RIP Icemark.
 
Icemark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Rohnert Park CA
Posts: 25,896
Likes: 0
Received 19 Likes on 19 Posts
Originally Posted by 90WhiteVrt
yall totally killed me thread
No we answerd your questions... did you have more that you were not communicating
Icemark is offline  
Old 08-31-05, 10:56 AM
  #21  
FC4ME

Thread Starter
 
90WhiteVrt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 1,079
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Nope good now, thanks! Found a GTU in a junkyard here in raleigh, so i will go check it out today and see what i can get!
90WhiteVrt is offline  
Old 08-31-05, 11:13 AM
  #22  
Former Moderator. RIP Icemark.
 
Icemark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Rohnert Park CA
Posts: 25,896
Likes: 0
Received 19 Likes on 19 Posts
Originally Posted by 90WhiteVrt
Nope good now, thanks! Found a GTU in a junkyard here in raleigh, so i will go check it out today and see what i can get!
No, the GTU has the same 4.1 rear and that you currently have.

If you wanted a 4.3 rear end, you would want a 89-90 GTUs (note the small S), not a GTU
Icemark is offline  
Old 08-31-05, 11:52 AM
  #23  
FC4ME

Thread Starter
 
90WhiteVrt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 1,079
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
90WhiteVrt is offline  
Old 08-31-05, 12:08 PM
  #24  
Rotary Freak

 
snub disphenoid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Northern California
Posts: 2,116
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by 90WhiteVrt
The head banging will ensue further, as GTUs rear differentials are hard to come by and are typically ludicrously expensive.
snub disphenoid is offline  
Old 08-31-05, 05:27 PM
  #25  
...94% correct.

 
Makenzie71's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: High Texas
Posts: 1,283
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by Icemark
Hey we finally agree... yeah the MA6X/RA6X series was the last real Celica too




Mine looked just like that...I sold her for $1100...
Makenzie71 is offline  


Quick Reply: 411 rear end



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:10 PM.