3in Vs 2.5in
#1
my fc broke
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: rohnert park,CA/ bay area
Posts: 2,231
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
3in Vs 2.5in
i was just wondering if there is a big difference in 3 compared to 2.5 because ive been thinking about it and if its that much better than i want to get my whole exhaust redone.
#3
Older than Dirt
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Parts Unknown
Posts: 1,448
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
No, not true, infact at somepoint you will have diminished returns. In theory engines will have a optium exhaust size for best tuning perfomrance. Things like location of collector will effect the car's performance at different spots in the RPM band. I believe the optium size for an NA is 2.5". I am not sure on TII's
Big is good, but tuning your car intails more than size.
Big is good, but tuning your car intails more than size.
#4
Sick & Twisted
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: FT Lauderdale, Fl
Posts: 1,993
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by Mr. Gadget
No, not true, infact at somepoint you will have diminished returns. In theory engines will have a optium exhaust size for best tuning perfomrance. Things like location of collector will effect the car's performance at different spots in the RPM band. I believe the optium size for an NA is 2.5". I am not sure on TII's
Big is good, but tuning your car intails more than size.
No, not true, infact at somepoint you will have diminished returns. In theory engines will have a optium exhaust size for best tuning perfomrance. Things like location of collector will effect the car's performance at different spots in the RPM band. I believe the optium size for an NA is 2.5". I am not sure on TII's
Big is good, but tuning your car intails more than size.
#6
Older than Dirt
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Parts Unknown
Posts: 1,448
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by dvls-7
yes there is a difference.....bigger is better.....
yes there is a difference.....bigger is better.....
Trending Topics
#8
Rotary Freak
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Ottawa, Ontario
Posts: 2,788
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Right but when the turbo outlet is only 2.5", why would you get anything bigger, if you stick with the stock turbo? The flows won't be increased, thats for sure, and the velocity will be decreased. So what's the point?
#10
I'm a boost creep...
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 15,608
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes
on
8 Posts
The law of diminishing returns applies to almost anything, but that does not make a 3" exhuast unnecessary. The point is a 3" exhaust will make more power than a 2.5" one. Period. The size of the turbo's outlet also doesn't matter. The bigger the exhaust pipe, the easier it is for the engine to push it's exhaust gases down the length of the system. That's simple fluid dynamics. The less work the engine has to do pushing gases out, the faster the turbo can spool and the more power that is available at the crank.
This applies equally to turbos and NA's, but for NA's the larger pipe must come after the tuned section of the exhaust.
Note that the only disadvantage a 3" exhaust will have on FC's is boost creep. You must have made the necessary mods to keep boost down.
This applies equally to turbos and NA's, but for NA's the larger pipe must come after the tuned section of the exhaust.
Note that the only disadvantage a 3" exhaust will have on FC's is boost creep. You must have made the necessary mods to keep boost down.
Last edited by NZConvertible; 09-13-03 at 10:00 PM.
#11
Junior Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: SA
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From what i know
go the 3".
Just make sure that you watch out for boost creep. With a flow through exhaust system, you should expect to see up to 14psi on your boost gauge.
This is a no-no as motor/turbo might go "pop"
Port your waste gate, get a fcd/boost controler and you should be fine
You'll probably regret it when you want more power in the long run. I don't know about you, but thats my goal for sure!!!
Chuch
go the 3".
Just make sure that you watch out for boost creep. With a flow through exhaust system, you should expect to see up to 14psi on your boost gauge.
This is a no-no as motor/turbo might go "pop"
Port your waste gate, get a fcd/boost controler and you should be fine
You'll probably regret it when you want more power in the long run. I don't know about you, but thats my goal for sure!!!
Chuch
#13
Moderator
iTrader: (1)
Originally posted by NZConvertible
...Note that the only disadvantage a 3" exhaust will have on FC's is boost creep. You must have made the necessary mods to keep boost down.
...Note that the only disadvantage a 3" exhaust will have on FC's is boost creep. You must have made the necessary mods to keep boost down.
#14
Currently Winning
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Birmingham, AL
Posts: 2,438
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
easiest way:
port the **** out of the wastegate. that's the easiest way. you can port it to the size of the puck or you can have bnr port it and put a bigger puck on it. i drove a t2 with a gigantic port on the wastegate and full 3" exhaust and there was no boost creep.
port the **** out of the wastegate. that's the easiest way. you can port it to the size of the puck or you can have bnr port it and put a bigger puck on it. i drove a t2 with a gigantic port on the wastegate and full 3" exhaust and there was no boost creep.
#16
Hks Ownz Me (
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: corona,CA
Posts: 1,489
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
get 3 inch!!!! i got 2.5 and i can feel it choking the motor after 5500....and no its not my turbo!! you can just tell by the exhaust note.... you'll know what im talking about if you get 2.5 exhuast... but none the less... WAY better than stock
#17
Rotary Freak
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Ottawa, Ontario
Posts: 2,788
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
What exact difference are we talking about when we're comparing the 2.5" RacingBeat exhaust and the 3" RacingBeat exaust. I know that 3" will flow better regardless, but it will impede velocity.
So what HP differences are we talkin about here?
So what HP differences are we talkin about here?
#18
Rotary Enthusiast
the boost increase with the 3 in will make all the difference in hp, so it depends how you set the controller.
The lost velocity will only take effect at low rpm, and since TII's have crap low end anyway, it doesn't matter. On an N/A you have to decide, larger pipes will raise the high end power, but smaller pipes will help low-mid range
The lost velocity will only take effect at low rpm, and since TII's have crap low end anyway, it doesn't matter. On an N/A you have to decide, larger pipes will raise the high end power, but smaller pipes will help low-mid range
#19
Rotary Freak
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Ottawa, Ontario
Posts: 2,788
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
So if i get a 2.5" turboback by RB, and just up the boost to where it would normally creep with a 3" exhaust (lol), I would get similar power as I would from a full three incher?
I'll eventually be going to a BNR stage 3... but it doesn't really matter as the hot side of the turbo remains stock :P
I'll eventually be going to a BNR stage 3... but it doesn't really matter as the hot side of the turbo remains stock :P
#20
...94% correct.
^...no
With a turbo car if you want 5" plumbing under there then by all means get it. With a turbo charger there are no pulses, no delta waves, just smooth and constant flow. You want the freest flowing possible exhaust. 3" would be good.
With a turbo car if you want 5" plumbing under there then by all means get it. With a turbo charger there are no pulses, no delta waves, just smooth and constant flow. You want the freest flowing possible exhaust. 3" would be good.
#21
Full Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Irving, Tx
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
everyone says that with a 3" exhaust you will need a FCD...but won't that lean the crap outa the A/F ratio? wouldn't it be better to get a boost controller and just keep the pressure to 8 lbs. I mean you won't be seeing the gains of 13 lbs of boost but would this not be better for the life of the engine?
#23
Could someone explain me sonething about Boost Controllers ? For exemple, the simple ball & spring design manual one. If I understand it right, it is used to fool the wastegate, letting it see less boost than the actual value, like I want 10 psi so I adjust my BC for it to show 8 psi at the wastegate when the real pressure is at 10 psi. Am I right ? So if the wastegate cannot flow more (without porting it of course), even with a MBC you would still be experiencing boost creep right ? This is my first turbo car so it is new for me.
#24
Full Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Irving, Tx
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by ponykiller
exactly, but that is why there are piggyback fuel controllers (SAFCs, etc)
exactly, but that is why there are piggyback fuel controllers (SAFCs, etc)
#25
S-afc and such piggyback fuel controllers simply trick the ECU, letting you adjust fuel delivery in a certain range. It keeps the stock fuel/ignition maps and does not change anything in the ECU itself.