2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.

3 Mod Rule for FC??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 15, 2004 | 10:29 PM
  #1  
rotarynemesis's Avatar
Thread Starter
FD Maniac
Tenured Member: 20 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 698
Likes: 0
From: Jacksonville FL
3 Mod Rule for FC??

Does the 3 mod rule for FDs apply to FCs as well.
What do you guys reccommend as far as basic modifying to a 86 N/A. Im thinking somthing along the lines of cold air intake, header back exhaust (size?) and a nice fat radiator to keep it cool. This will be a basic daily driver so nothing drastic. Will I need an engine management system or just a fuel computer or what.

Any comments accepted. Thanks
Reply
Old Feb 15, 2004 | 10:51 PM
  #2  
hpram99's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 540
Likes: 0
From: -
For those of us fc owners that don't even look in the fd section.. what's the 3 mod rule?
Reply
Old Feb 15, 2004 | 10:55 PM
  #3  
Scott 89t2's Avatar
SOLD THE RX-7!
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 7,451
Likes: 0
From: Vancouver, BC, Canada
you don't need fuel computers for your NA. it's not going to blow up like an FD will.
Reply
Old Feb 15, 2004 | 10:56 PM
  #4  
Senior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 659
Likes: 0
From: Delaware
Not sure what the 3mod rule is, but cat replacement pipe and presilencer from racing beat is a good start, along with a catback exhaust. Then intake, and that should be it. I don't think you will need a new radiator with those mods, but flush the coolant system and replace t-stat for maintenance.
Reply
Old Feb 15, 2004 | 11:15 PM
  #5  
andrew lohaus's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,255
Likes: 0
From: fl
no n/a short of a race prep periphrial port realy needs a bigger radiator as long as the stock sytem is in good shape.
Reply
Old Feb 15, 2004 | 11:26 PM
  #6  
Bio-Weapon's Avatar
Wha?
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 584
Likes: 0
From: Niagara Falls, Canada
the three mod rule is 3 mods, then you need either a rechipped ecu or fuel computer. It is a stupid rule because if you put on a downpipe, midpipe and catback, you have still freed up your exhaust way too much, and will boost spike quite a bit. You can mod an N/A FC to your hearts content and never really need a fuel computer, short of getting a monster port job done.
Reply
Old Feb 15, 2004 | 11:38 PM
  #7  
j9fd3s's Avatar
Moderator
Community Builder
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 31,835
Likes: 3,233
From: https://www2.mazda.com/en/100th/
the 3 mod rule doesnt apply to anything, you can have as many mods on your fd as you want and as long as its under 11psi its fine
Reply
Old Feb 15, 2004 | 11:57 PM
  #8  
Evil Aviator's Avatar
Rotorhead
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 9,136
Likes: 39
From: Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
Re: 3 Mod Rule for FC??

I think that a standalone EMS is one of the first things you should buy if you are serious about performance. Otherwise, you can just add an intake and exhaust and call it good. A fuel computer is really more for turbocharged cars, and doesn't do much for a non-turbo car that has only an intake and exhaust. What you need to realize is that your 86 ECU is dog-slow, so any type of piggyback system or reprogrammed ECU must still work through the nasty stock ECU. If you decide on an EMS, I recommend the Wolf3DV4, Haltech E6 with 1bar MAP sensor, and the Haltech E11 with 1bar MAP sensor will be a good choice once the bugs get worked out. Microtech is also supposedly working on an EMS for non-turbo cars, but it isn't on the market yet.
http://www.wolfems.com.au/home
http://www.haltech.com.au/

The Racing Beat catback exhaust is pretty good.
http://www.racingbeat.com/resultset....rtNumber=16420
The RP 50mm catback isn't quite the same quality, but it's a good budget exhaust.
http://www.rx7.com/cgi-local/2catalo...at=11&part=150
Both of the above offer replacement cats/pipes, depending on your local regulations. Also, if you decide on a full exhaust, the Mazdatrix dual exhaust (sometimes called "true dual" by the technically-challenged folks) is rather popular with non-ported engines.
http://www.mazdatrix.com/r-ex86nt.htm
Other exhausts here:
http://66.216.67.51/subcat.asp?0=210

The stock FC radiator is awful, but it should still cool well enough with your limited modifications. If you are like me, and simply do not like the crummy plastic end tanks and the air problems, then you may want to get a replacement radiator. Fluidyne and K2RD make some decent drop-in replacement radiators. Always use a Mazda brand thermostat in the FC, as the aftermarket thermostats are complete junk and could ruin your engine.
http://66.216.67.51/subcatmfgprod.asp?0=352&1=354&2=-1

BTW, the main advantage of the NA FC is its handling qualities, so you may want to spend some money on good shocks, springs, and bushings to get the most out of the car. If you are like most NA FC owners, you will get much more enjoyment out of these modifications than you will on engine modifications that will only add a small amount of horsepower.

Last edited by Evil Aviator; Feb 16, 2004 at 12:05 AM.
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2004 | 02:12 AM
  #9  
Relisys190's Avatar
REINCARNATED
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,713
Likes: 180
From: South Eastern USA
I am getting ready to install a Microtech on my 86 N/A car.

I am hoping for noticable increase in HP but since not ALOT of people have acctually full stand alone EMS systems in N/A's i am unsure of what to expect. My car is currently running completely stock ports on about a 24-25k mile engine. The damn thing runs great but my goal with all the mods i have is 200 hp at the flywheel BEFORE port work.

-Markus Reschny
www.mazsport.net
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2004 | 03:05 AM
  #10  
White_FC's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,228
Likes: 0
From: Darwin, NT, Australia
I whacked on a microtech in my "'85" S4 N/A, before I turbo'd it.

Can't say there was a huge increase in power, after I tunned it abit (not on a dyno, no print outs, sorry.. :-) ) it certainly felt faster to drive..

But that was on stock ports, I guess with a wild streetport or more you would expect much larger gains.
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2004 | 07:29 AM
  #11  
MPM's Avatar
MPM
Senior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 445
Likes: 0
From: Alabama just east of B'ham
Originally posted by Bio-Weapon
You can mod an N/A FC to your hearts content and never really need a fuel computer, short of getting a monster port job done.
Wrong. N/A FC's usually run rich so controlling the fuel is very important and one of the keys to making the engine run better. Piggy back systems work pretty well but you are limited somewhat. Like Evil said a stand alone is the way to go.
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2004 | 09:17 AM
  #12  
rotarynemesis's Avatar
Thread Starter
FD Maniac
Tenured Member: 20 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 698
Likes: 0
From: Jacksonville FL
OK so no computer for header, no cat, catback system, basically straight through system, and cold air intake. Any one kno who makes cold air intakes?
So it wont overheat in traffic on 90degree days? Thats why I was saying radiator also but if not then great.
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2004 | 09:44 AM
  #13  
truespin88's Avatar
truespin, not tirespin
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 655
Likes: 0
From: Belpre, Ohio
Checkpoint Engineering makes a CAI
AzTech Rotary makes a CAI
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2004 | 11:11 AM
  #14  
j9fd3s's Avatar
Moderator
Community Builder
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 31,835
Likes: 3,233
From: https://www2.mazda.com/en/100th/
Originally posted by Relisys190
I am getting ready to install a Microtech on my 86 N/A car.

I am hoping for noticable increase in HP but since not ALOT of people have acctually full stand alone EMS systems in N/A's i am unsure of what to expect. My car is currently running completely stock ports on about a 24-25k mile engine. The damn thing runs great but my goal with all the mods i have is 200 hp at the flywheel BEFORE port work.

-Markus Reschny
www.mazsport.net
we saw a 5rwhp gain with the haltech, granted our fuel tuning was off. car is stock ports, stock intake w cone, and full exhaust
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2004 | 01:23 PM
  #15  
Bambam7's Avatar
I came, I saw, I boosted.
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 1,921
Likes: 0
From: Windsor, Ontario, Canada
Mostr of the gain is had in the midrange, by leaning it out. The majority of the improvement is throttle response. not nesccesarily brute power.
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2004 | 02:57 PM
  #16  
j9fd3s's Avatar
Moderator
Community Builder
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 31,835
Likes: 3,233
From: https://www2.mazda.com/en/100th/
from 6000-9000 its over 145rwhp, we had work to do on the 4000-6000 part of the map too
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2004 | 03:45 PM
  #17  
andrew lohaus's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,255
Likes: 0
From: fl
Originally posted by MPM
Wrong. N/A FC's usually run rich so controlling the fuel is very important and one of the keys to making the engine run better. Piggy back systems work pretty well but you are limited somewhat. Like Evil said a stand alone is the way to go.

just because a car will benefit from a fuel controler does not neccesitate it. icemark's n/a put down 175 to the wheels on a stock feul system and it was probobly still running rich.
an reasonably modded n/a engine will run safely and reliably on the stock fuel management, it just might not be running the ideal ratios for maximum power per mod.
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2004 | 04:45 PM
  #18  
j9fd3s's Avatar
Moderator
Community Builder
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 31,835
Likes: 3,233
From: https://www2.mazda.com/en/100th/
Originally posted by andrew lohaus
just because a car will benefit from a fuel controler does not neccesitate it. icemark's n/a put down 175 to the wheels on a stock feul system and it was probobly still running rich.
an reasonably modded n/a engine will run safely and reliably on the stock fuel management, it just might not be running the ideal ratios for maximum power per mod.
we found a lot (all in our case) by playing with the timing
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2004 | 06:33 PM
  #19  
RETed's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 26,664
Likes: 22
From: n
Ignore the 3 mod rule - stupid FD's use them cause of the MAP sensor based load ECU.

That doesn't mean you can do whatever you want to your FC - there are recommended guidelines to modify your FC though...


-Ted
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
demetlaw
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
6
Oct 2, 2015 06:22 PM
musker
New Member RX-7 Technical
1
Oct 1, 2015 05:58 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:43 PM.