2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.

2.5" or 3" exhaust

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 21, 2008 | 12:15 PM
  #1  
GenNikon's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
From: San Antonio
2.5" or 3" exhaust

Alright I searched around for this for a while, but couldn't find any discussion on it.

car=1988 rx7 gxl n/a

would a 2.5 or 3 inch exhaust system be better for keeping the lowend torque aswell as getting high end hp aswell??

Ive heard 3 is better, but I was just more opinions to help the matter!
Reply
Old Feb 21, 2008 | 12:28 PM
  #2  
koukifc3s's Avatar
Clogged cat
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 2,000
Likes: 0
From: Orange County, CA
2.5" on n/a is the max size you wanna go.
Reply
Old Feb 21, 2008 | 12:53 PM
  #3  
teddyrx2's Avatar
One Luv "Till The End"
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (33)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 13,757
Likes: 0
From: san diego
Why stop at 2.5...if your trying to get the max power out of your car with no limitation...go three inch...for both turbo and n/a...will be better in the long run on the car...
Reply
Old Feb 21, 2008 | 02:03 PM
  #4  
Icemark's Avatar
Former Moderator. RIP Icemark.
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 25,896
Likes: 24
From: Rohnert Park CA
No, teddy that is wrong.

The absolute maximum size for a non turbo would be a 2.5 inch, and generally you would be better off with a 2" to 2.25" (ID) exhaust for a non turbo. In fact HKS, builds their non turbo exhaust out of 50mm (ID) for maximum power. 50mm is actually just under 2 inches.

See with a non turbo, with too big of an exhaust the exhaust velocity slows down... so instead of the exhaust shooting out because of high velocity, it actually pools and swirls at most any bend or clamp.

If you had to go big, keep the pipe 2" until you get about 1 foot past the rear cat converter flange, then you can go up to a 2.5" ID. This provides the best low end torque, but still flows well on high engine speed.
Reply
Old Feb 21, 2008 | 02:10 PM
  #5  
HKSpoweredFC3S's Avatar
Custom User Title
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 268
Likes: 0
From: Arkansas
Indeed, you would be retarted to go 3" on a n/a...

2.5 at the most, as said before.

I would recomend 2.25 if your planing on just BPU
Reply
Old Feb 21, 2008 | 02:50 PM
  #6  
MmSadda's Avatar
Rotary Freak
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,595
Likes: 2
From: Columbus, OH
If those are your choices, go with a 2.5" system. 2.25 seems to be a pretty common choice around these parts.

I'm saying this assuming that you're running close to stock... If you're running a massive port job, maybe you'll want something bigger. I'm guessing, though, that you're using a street car, not a racecar.
Reply
Old Feb 21, 2008 | 06:06 PM
  #7  
crazyasu's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 192
Likes: 0
From: Victoria
I'm running 2.25" with an extra long high flow resonator in place of the cats, magnaflow muffs and 3" tips...love the sound especially when I get up into the higher rpm range
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Ian_D
New Member RX-7 Technical
6
Sep 6, 2015 10:38 PM
doritoloco
New Member RX-7 Technical
7
Sep 5, 2015 12:41 PM
FührerTüner
General Rotary Tech Support
3
Sep 4, 2015 01:41 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:50 AM.