2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.
Sponsored by:

2.5" or 3" exhaust

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-21-08, 12:15 PM
  #1  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
GenNikon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: San Antonio
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2.5" or 3" exhaust

Alright I searched around for this for a while, but couldn't find any discussion on it.

car=1988 rx7 gxl n/a

would a 2.5 or 3 inch exhaust system be better for keeping the lowend torque aswell as getting high end hp aswell??

Ive heard 3 is better, but I was just more opinions to help the matter!
Old 02-21-08, 12:28 PM
  #2  
Clogged cat

iTrader: (3)
 
koukifc3s's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 2,000
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2.5" on n/a is the max size you wanna go.
Old 02-21-08, 12:53 PM
  #3  
One Luv "Till The End"

iTrader: (33)
 
teddyrx2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: san diego
Posts: 13,757
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Why stop at 2.5...if your trying to get the max power out of your car with no limitation...go three inch...for both turbo and n/a...will be better in the long run on the car...
Old 02-21-08, 02:03 PM
  #4  
Former Moderator. RIP Icemark.
 
Icemark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Rohnert Park CA
Posts: 25,896
Likes: 0
Received 19 Likes on 19 Posts
No, teddy that is wrong.

The absolute maximum size for a non turbo would be a 2.5 inch, and generally you would be better off with a 2" to 2.25" (ID) exhaust for a non turbo. In fact HKS, builds their non turbo exhaust out of 50mm (ID) for maximum power. 50mm is actually just under 2 inches.

See with a non turbo, with too big of an exhaust the exhaust velocity slows down... so instead of the exhaust shooting out because of high velocity, it actually pools and swirls at most any bend or clamp.

If you had to go big, keep the pipe 2" until you get about 1 foot past the rear cat converter flange, then you can go up to a 2.5" ID. This provides the best low end torque, but still flows well on high engine speed.
Old 02-21-08, 02:10 PM
  #5  
Custom User Title

 
HKSpoweredFC3S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 268
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Indeed, you would be retarted to go 3" on a n/a...

2.5 at the most, as said before.

I would recomend 2.25 if your planing on just BPU
Old 02-21-08, 02:50 PM
  #6  
Rotary Freak

iTrader: (2)
 
MmSadda's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 1,595
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If those are your choices, go with a 2.5" system. 2.25 seems to be a pretty common choice around these parts.

I'm saying this assuming that you're running close to stock... If you're running a massive port job, maybe you'll want something bigger. I'm guessing, though, that you're using a street car, not a racecar.
Old 02-21-08, 06:06 PM
  #7  
Full Member

 
crazyasu's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Victoria
Posts: 192
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'm running 2.25" with an extra long high flow resonator in place of the cats, magnaflow muffs and 3" tips...love the sound especially when I get up into the higher rpm range
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Ian_D
New Member RX-7 Technical
6
09-06-15 10:38 PM
doritoloco
New Member RX-7 Technical
7
09-05-15 12:41 PM
FührerTüner
General Rotary Tech Support
3
09-04-15 01:41 PM



Quick Reply: 2.5" or 3" exhaust



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:18 PM.