2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.
Sponsored by:

17x8.5 17x9 on FC

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-06-04, 03:44 PM
  #1  
Full Member

Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Columbia, SC
Posts: 128
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
17x8.5 17x9 on FC

Got these rims off Neofreak. Took 1/4" spacers in the front and 2.5" wheel studs to make em fit. the the backs fit fine.

The front has 235/45/17s and the back 255/40/17s...



Old 05-06-04, 03:45 PM
  #2  
Full Member

Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Columbia, SC
Posts: 128
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
back



front

Old 05-06-04, 03:48 PM
  #3  
pip
the blackest incarnation

 
pip's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Milwaukee, Wisconsin
Posts: 760
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Nice! Those look damn good, are they te-37's ? The pics are kinda blurry so I cant quite tell.
Old 05-06-04, 03:50 PM
  #4  
Full Member

Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Columbia, SC
Posts: 128
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
yeah, TE37s and thanks!
Old 05-06-04, 04:19 PM
  #5  
Is that thing Turbo?

 
totallimmortal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Maryland
Posts: 1,411
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
very nice i just got some 5Zigen MK-5s in 18x7.5 with 225s all around they fit like a glove can't wait to get some pics of em
Old 05-06-04, 04:21 PM
  #6  
Full Member

Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Columbia, SC
Posts: 128
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I can't burn out anymore with the 255s on the back... gonna have to mod more!
Old 05-06-04, 04:50 PM
  #7  
Senior Member

 
enrique's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: san diego, ca
Posts: 360
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
the spacers out back to clear the tire from hitting?
Old 05-06-04, 04:53 PM
  #8  
Full Member

Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Columbia, SC
Posts: 128
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
No spacers on back... just on front..
Old 05-08-04, 03:19 PM
  #9  
The AUTO DOCTOR

 
BadAssRX-7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: South Side of ATL. Ga.
Posts: 1,952
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
pretty slick ryan...pretty slick
Old 05-10-04, 08:54 AM
  #10  
Full Member

Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Columbia, SC
Posts: 128
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks David.

Next im gonna have you do some engine mods..
Old 05-10-04, 09:37 AM
  #11  
Senior Member

 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 478
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by tabularasa
I can't burn out anymore with the 255s on the back... gonna have to mod more!
I wish I had that problem

Who cares about burning out? I want to be able to grip and go
Old 05-10-04, 09:37 AM
  #12  
wtf's a piston

 
gerbraldy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Englewood, FL
Posts: 1,717
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I slapped these 95 3 double spoke'd mustang rims on mine, to see how it would sit with 17's. The tires are 245/45 all around. I found out they don't fit very well on the front. A little bit of inner fender lost, but it was worth the insight. These new perellis rip it up a shitload compared to my bbs rims with 225 goodyears on the back.
Old 05-10-04, 09:56 AM
  #13  
Full Member

Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Columbia, SC
Posts: 128
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by stupify
I wish I had that problem

Who cares about burning out? I want to be able to grip and go
That just means i need more horses...

I definatly grip and go though... 255s on the back...
Old 05-10-04, 10:32 AM
  #14  
STUCK. I got SNOWNED!!!!!

iTrader: (7)
 
Terrh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Windsor, On
Posts: 8,723
Received 13 Likes on 9 Posts
NICE.
Old 05-10-04, 11:47 AM
  #15  
Rotary Freak

 
krazykoncepts's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Toronto
Posts: 1,790
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
whats the offset on those?
Old 05-10-04, 11:54 AM
  #16  
777** The Anti-rice

 
DEZERTE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 2,100
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Dont fatter tires make you slower? IM not being an ***, just asking. I thought they killed ur top speed and acceleration.
Old 05-10-04, 11:58 AM
  #17  
Full Member

Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Columbia, SC
Posts: 128
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Krazy - its either 40 or 42.... i dont remember.. :-)

Dez - yeah, it basically killed my acceleration, thats why i said i needed more mods. I really wanted better traction in the rain (and obviously to look damn good), which the difference is huge (for both). The roads down here in SC suck ballz, so i was spinning all over the place with the 205s...

Dont really feel like hydroplaning off the road either...
Old 05-10-04, 12:21 PM
  #18  
truespin, not tirespin

 
truespin88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Belpre, Ohio
Posts: 655
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by tabularasa
Krazy - its either 40 or 42.... i dont remember.. :-)

Dez - yeah, it basically killed my acceleration, thats why i said i needed more mods. I really wanted better traction in the rain (and obviously to look damn good), which the difference is huge (for both). The roads down here in SC suck ballz, so i was spinning all over the place with the 205s...

Dont really feel like hydroplaning off the road either...

Um. You are wrong sir. You would be better off with a 205 in the rain than a 255. Want proof? Take a pencil, point down, and drop it into some water. Sinks. Same pencil, drop it long-ways (so that it has more contact area) and it will stop on the water, and may or may not sink afterwards. A wider tire takes longer to get the water out from under it because it has to move the water further.

Good luck.
Old 05-10-04, 12:25 PM
  #19  
Full Member

Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Columbia, SC
Posts: 128
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You also have to take in consideration the tires that i had on in the first place. Which were not the best in the world.

I moved to RE750s which have a killer rain rating.. The tires displace MUCH more water than my old tires. Which in my case, made the car much more stable in the rain...

What you say makes sense though...
Old 05-10-04, 01:41 PM
  #20  
Eat, sleep, work, mod.

 
jon88se's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Long Island
Posts: 2,517
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thinner tires are better for snow/dirt/gravel/large amounts of water. You want the tire to cut through these road surfaces, not ride above them...this is why rally cars use skinnies in really foul conditions.
Old 05-10-04, 01:50 PM
  #21  
Senior Member

 
drft_180sx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NYC/Stony Brook Univ.
Posts: 702
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I love they way the back fits, they are perfect...can you please tell me the offset???

The front stick out just a tad but nice looking rims regardless.
Old 05-10-04, 02:24 PM
  #22  
Full Member

Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Columbia, SC
Posts: 128
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
+40 offset... You might want to get 7.5s in the front if you dont want to use spacers..

thanks!
Old 05-10-04, 05:15 PM
  #23  
777** The Anti-rice

 
DEZERTE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 2,100
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
They do look really smooth, thats for sure.
Old 05-10-04, 07:08 PM
  #24  
Full Member

Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Columbia, SC
Posts: 128
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks! I think so too.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
meximan
Suspension/Wheels/Tires/Brakes
8
09-25-15 01:39 AM
meximan
2nd Generation Non-Technical and pictures
2
09-22-15 05:21 PM



Quick Reply: 17x8.5 17x9 on FC



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:18 AM.