2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.

1.3L NT = 1.3 Convertible?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 3, 2005 | 01:11 AM
  #1  
xindiren's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newbie
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
From: Dallas, Texas
1.3L NT = 1.3 Convertible?

i'm looking to buy a new clutch, i have a question.
many of the listings for clutches are labelled as such:

1.3L Turbo
1.3L NT (non-turbo in some instances)
1.3L convertible

I have an '88 convertible. Here's my question: will a clutch listed for use in a non-turbo vehicle be compatible with my convertible, even though it does not specifically say '1.3L Convertible'?
Reply
Old Sep 3, 2005 | 01:24 AM
  #2  
1987RX7guy's Avatar
Eat Rice Don't Drive it.
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 12,752
Likes: 1
From: Laredo, Tx
It should be. Given all the differences I know of are only between non turbo and turbo models.
Reply
Old Sep 3, 2005 | 01:40 AM
  #3  
Sideways7's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 6,598
Likes: 10
From: Temple, Texas (Central)
Yeah, I don't think there was a different manual transmission for the convertables so any NA clutch should work.
Reply
Old Sep 16, 2005 | 09:38 AM
  #4  
Mordachai's Avatar
_
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 634
Likes: 0
From: South Florida WPB
heh, I'm in the market for a clutch kit too.

And I've found the same thing.
But My thought is that if the regular NA clutch works, why do they list a seperate one for the vert instead of just saying all NA -vert included?

IT leads me to belive that there is a difference, but after pages and pages of searching, I can't find any difference at all......

anyone know different?

|M|
Reply
Old Sep 16, 2005 | 02:23 PM
  #5  
pmr2000's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 419
Likes: 0
From: NYC
Is the convertible clutch listing more expensive than the NT? If so that may be the reason. I've seen that be the case with GM parts-you want a starter for a 'Vette costs more even thought its the same part as a Impala.
Reply
Old Sep 16, 2005 | 03:50 PM
  #6  
Icemark's Avatar
Former Moderator. RIP Icemark.
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 25,896
Likes: 24
From: Rohnert Park CA
Non turbo manual tranny Verts used the M50 tranny, instead of the M85 found in all the non turbo coupes.
Reply
Old Sep 16, 2005 | 04:04 PM
  #7  
Mordachai's Avatar
_
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 634
Likes: 0
From: South Florida WPB
^ so would that also mean a different clutch?
(yeah, I'm slow)
Reply
Old Sep 17, 2005 | 12:09 AM
  #8  
Icemark's Avatar
Former Moderator. RIP Icemark.
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 25,896
Likes: 24
From: Rohnert Park CA
Originally Posted by Mordachai
^ so would that also mean a different clutch?
(yeah, I'm slow)
yeah, I would suspect that the non turbo verts would use a softer spring for the pressure plate while a higher clamp force to make up for the extra weight on the non turbo verts.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
spokanerxdude
Megasquirt Forum
3
Oct 6, 2015 12:28 PM
Robrods64
New Member RX-7 Technical
6
Oct 2, 2015 07:56 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:21 PM.