2nd Generation Non-Technical and pictures Show off your car & view 2nd gen RX-7 pictures here.
Sponsored by:

Running down a Ferrari F430 challenge racecar

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-18-11, 08:58 PM
  #1  
Full Member

Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
tinner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: central OH
Posts: 135
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Running down a Ferrari F430 challenge racecar

A quick vid from Nelson Ledges Road Course.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6l5S7VAI-z4

Camera car, my V6 powered FC. Limited by my racing class to 185 rwhp and 2850lbs.
Old 06-18-11, 10:16 PM
  #2  
Moderator

iTrader: (25)
 
Spirit-RE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Whitewater, WI
Posts: 2,941
Received 39 Likes on 22 Posts
what for a v6?
Old 06-18-11, 10:33 PM
  #3  
Insane Burning Diarrhea

 
SayNoToPistons's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Noo Yawk City / San Diego
Posts: 1,796
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
ANy reason why the F430 Challenge was slower than usual?
Old 06-19-11, 04:03 PM
  #4  
not a drifter

iTrader: (133)
 
87 t-66's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Posts: 9,337
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
your car is sweet...we need to meet up sometime. i also live in columbus
Old 06-19-11, 04:40 PM
  #5  
Slowpoke

iTrader: (3)
 
Hypertek's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Socal
Posts: 5,273
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
could you share some info about your car, suspension, tires, engine .
Old 06-19-11, 08:41 PM
  #6  
Full Member

Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
tinner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: central OH
Posts: 135
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by SayNoToPistons
ANy reason why the F430 Challenge was slower than usual?
He was running pretty quick and consistent. But both the Ferrari and my car were not optimized for a track as rough as Nelson

Originally Posted by 87 t-66
your car is sweet...we need to meet up sometime. i also live in columbus
I'll be at Mid Ohio for the NASA event in July, stop by and check out some racing. Better yet, sign up and drive on one of the best road courses in the US

Originally Posted by Hypertek
could you share some info about your car, suspension, tires, engine .
1998 GM 3.8 90 degree V6 detuned to 185rwhp
2850lbs. including driver, fuel, and 220lbs. of ballast
225/45/17 BFG R1s
Stance coilovers 10k front 8k rear springs
1 1/8" front sway bar, no rear bar
Old 06-20-11, 02:22 PM
  #7  
Rotary Revolutionary

iTrader: (16)
 
sharingan 19's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Jacksonville, Tampa & Tallahassee
Posts: 3,881
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Any particular reason you chose to de tune a v6 as opposed to going w/another motor? Perhaps one that's lighter, offers better weight distribution, or is easier to mount? I mean you can make 185whp w/ anything
Old 06-20-11, 03:21 PM
  #8  
rotorhead

iTrader: (3)
 
arghx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: cold
Posts: 16,182
Received 429 Likes on 263 Posts
I mean 185rwhp... that's a stock T2 with a downpipe
Old 06-20-11, 03:34 PM
  #9  
Sharp Claws

iTrader: (30)
 
RotaryEvolution's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 5,107
Likes: 0
Received 41 Likes on 40 Posts
did they chop the F430 engine in half for this challenge? it should have 2.5 times the horsepower you do yet you were pulling on them in the straights, that should not happen... gotta love pansy *** rich people who can't drive.

the F430 challenge cars also weigh less than your 2850lb curb weight at 2701lbs curb weight, there's no reason they should be lagging behind unless they had governor's installed to keep the throttle from going further than 20%.

i just don't get it, unless they were instructionals.

Last edited by RotaryEvolution; 06-20-11 at 03:41 PM.
Old 06-20-11, 03:35 PM
  #10  
This is my social media.

iTrader: (22)
 
dwb87's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: WA
Posts: 2,744
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
That was an awesome video. I like it a lot.
Old 06-20-11, 03:38 PM
  #11  
Let's get silly...

iTrader: (7)
 
RockLobster's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Rosemount, MN
Posts: 1,718
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 7 Posts
Originally Posted by sharingan 19
Any particular reason you chose to de tune a v6 as opposed to going w/another motor? Perhaps one that's lighter, offers better weight distribution, or is easier to mount? I mean you can make 185whp w/ anything
Because class rules only dictate peak generated WHP to determine class (in very simplified terms).

So a torquey motor with a fairly flat power curve is ideal. To give you an idea, the most dominating cars in these classes are sometimes boosted cars that run high boost at low rpm but bleed it off as the RPMS rise to have a flat power curve...
Old 06-20-11, 04:00 PM
  #12  
rotors excite me

iTrader: (16)
 
SpeedOfLife's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Central Iowa
Posts: 4,083
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 6 Posts
interesting. 180hp flat from 2000RPM to 8000RPM would be significantly faster than 160 at 3000 growing to 185hp at 8000
Old 06-20-11, 05:30 PM
  #13  
5 and counting.

iTrader: (7)
 
FC3S Murray's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Montana
Posts: 1,651
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by SpeedOfLife
interesting. 180hp flat from 2000RPM to 8000RPM would be significantly faster than 160 at 3000 growing to 185hp at 8000
Yep. Instant torque too.
Old 06-20-11, 05:36 PM
  #14  
Full Member

Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
tinner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: central OH
Posts: 135
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by sharingan 19
Any particular reason you chose to de tune a v6 as opposed to going w/another motor? Perhaps one that's lighter, offers better weight distribution, or is easier to mount? I mean you can make 185whp w/ anything
Why don't you just come out and say you prefer rotaries. I like them too, but for what I do the V6 offers many advantages. The car is better balanced with the V6, lower center of gravity too. It has loads of torque and is ridiculously reliable.



Originally Posted by Karack
did they chop the F430 engine in half for this challenge? it should have 2.5 times the horsepower you do yet you were pulling on them in the straights, that should not happen... gotta love pansy *** rich people who can't drive.

the F430 challenge cars also weigh less than your 2850lb curb weight at 2701lbs curb weight, there's no reason they should be lagging behind unless they had governor's installed to keep the throttle from going further than 20%.

i just don't get it, unless they were instructionals.
We were both running laps averaging over 90mph. Look closer he was putting buslengths on me in the straights. He may be rich but he wasn't being a pansy. It takes ***** to hustle a car around Nelson Ledges, some drivers refuse to race there claiming it's too dangerous.
Old 06-20-11, 07:29 PM
  #15  
Boosted. I got BLOWN!!!

iTrader: (29)
 
beefhole's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Queens, NY
Posts: 3,742
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
^That track looks brutally rough. You can tell in the video the whole car is bouncing.
Old 06-20-11, 08:38 PM
  #16  
Rotary Revolutionary

iTrader: (16)
 
sharingan 19's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Jacksonville, Tampa & Tallahassee
Posts: 3,881
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by tinner
Why don't you just come out and say you prefer rotaries. I like them too, but for what I do the V6 offers many advantages. The car is better balanced with the V6, lower center of gravity too. It has loads of torque and is ridiculously reliable.
While, I do that was not my point (if it was I would have said so). I was just curious as to what benifits could be retained by underutilizing a heavier engine, as opposed to lighter one. I was thinking more along the lines of a 4cyl or 4cyl turbo actually since you certainly don't need 6cyl for 185hp. You answered my question.


We were both running laps averaging over 90mph. Look closer he was putting buslengths on me in the straights. He may be rich but he wasn't being a pansy. It takes ***** to hustle a car around Nelson Ledges, some drivers refuse to race there claiming it's too dangerous.
Well if the track is that much of a beast that it made those 2 cars look remotely equal then my hat goes off to you sir!
Old 06-20-11, 08:54 PM
  #17  
version 2.0

iTrader: (17)
 
texFCturboII's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Fort Worth, TX
Posts: 3,590
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by tinner
We were both running laps averaging over 90mph. Look closer he was putting buslengths on me in the straights. He may be rich but he wasn't being a pansy. It takes ***** to hustle a car around Nelson Ledges, some drivers refuse to race there claiming it's too dangerous.
Definitely... there were some straights that he was becoming a speck.... he definitely let you by; but still, nice racing; good lines and good throttle control; that track looks freaking terrifyingly rough.
Old 06-21-11, 11:04 AM
  #18  
Let's get silly...

iTrader: (7)
 
RockLobster's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Rosemount, MN
Posts: 1,718
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 7 Posts
Originally Posted by SpeedOfLife
interesting. 180hp flat from 2000RPM to 8000RPM would be significantly faster than 160 at 3000 growing to 185hp at 8000
Yeah except that you spend your entire time above 5000rpm regardless of the engine...5hp at the top will make the difference.

185 flat from 5000-8000 is the ideal situation, but really only possible with electronically controlled forced induction...
Old 06-21-11, 04:57 PM
  #19  
Full Member

Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
tinner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: central OH
Posts: 135
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by RockLobster
Yeah except that you spend your entire time above 5000rpm regardless of the engine...5hp at the top will make the difference.

185 flat from 5000-8000 is the ideal situation, but really only possible with electronically controlled forced induction...
My curve is pretty flat but stops just past 5000rpm

I'm as jealous of your guy's RPMs as you might be of my torque.
Old 06-21-11, 06:02 PM
  #20  
Let's get silly...

iTrader: (7)
 
RockLobster's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Rosemount, MN
Posts: 1,718
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 7 Posts
I've been keeping an eye out for a V6/6speed out of a 2011 mustang...that would be a nice swap...and before long they will be EVERYWHERE in wrecking yards/ebay/craigslists...
Old 06-21-11, 06:03 PM
  #21  
Let's get silly...

iTrader: (7)
 
RockLobster's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Rosemount, MN
Posts: 1,718
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 7 Posts
Originally Posted by tinner
My curve is pretty flat but stops just past 5000rpm

I'm as jealous of your guy's RPMs as you might be of my torque.
Hmm that is a low redline...That's TDI territory!
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
The Shaolin
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
9
09-14-15 07:50 PM
CaptainKRM
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
14
08-26-15 09:52 PM
IB Cristina
West RX-7 Forum
0
08-20-15 05:46 PM



Quick Reply: Running down a Ferrari F430 challenge racecar



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:29 PM.