Pics Request FC with RPF1's
Rotary Vtak
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 110
Likes: 0
From: Los Angeles
but to the stock fender i can fit 255> interesting. that would require a really good roll and excellent pulling of the fenders
I'll probably be picking up a set of these in the next few months.
17x9 +22 with a 235/45/17 square fitment.
Probably going to just buy an Eastwood Fender Roller.
Anyone know if the 9's up front with a +22 offset will have any problems with the suspension components or am I going to need to run some spacers? I'm not to worried about rolling and pulling the fenders. Thanks
17x9 +22 with a 235/45/17 square fitment.
Probably going to just buy an Eastwood Fender Roller.
Anyone know if the 9's up front with a +22 offset will have any problems with the suspension components or am I going to need to run some spacers? I'm not to worried about rolling and pulling the fenders. Thanks
I know when I was looking for wheels for my car I searched and searched for pictures, so now that I have them here's mine:
Rears: 17x10 with Nitto NT05R drag radials in 275/40/17 with MMR camber adjusters and BC coilovers
Fronts: 17x8.5 with Nitto NT05 in 235/40/17 with BC coilovers and some negative camber
Fenders are rolled flat all around (used Eastwood fender roller)
The rears definitely stick out an inch but I like the look personally. I could run more negative camber in the rear but then my contact patch would be tiny when the suspension compresses.
Rears: 17x10 with Nitto NT05R drag radials in 275/40/17 with MMR camber adjusters and BC coilovers
Fronts: 17x8.5 with Nitto NT05 in 235/40/17 with BC coilovers and some negative camber
Fenders are rolled flat all around (used Eastwood fender roller)
The rears definitely stick out an inch but I like the look personally. I could run more negative camber in the rear but then my contact patch would be tiny when the suspension compresses.
Rotary Enthusiast
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 885
Likes: 2
From: Canberra - Aus
Rears: 17x10 with Nitto NT05R drag radials in 275/40/17 with MMR camber adjusters and BC coilovers
Fronts: 17x8.5 with Nitto NT05 in 235/40/17 with BC coilovers and some negative camber
Fenders are rolled flat all around (used Eastwood fender roller)
The rears definitely stick out an inch but I like the look personally. I could run more negative camber in the rear but then my contact patch would be tiny when the suspension compresses.
Fronts: 17x8.5 with Nitto NT05 in 235/40/17 with BC coilovers and some negative camber
Fenders are rolled flat all around (used Eastwood fender roller)
The rears definitely stick out an inch but I like the look personally. I could run more negative camber in the rear but then my contact patch would be tiny when the suspension compresses.
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 3,881
Likes: 3
From: Jacksonville, Tampa & Tallahassee
Gotta disagree. There us nothing hot about convex (rpf1 in 8.5 +30 fitment) wheels. The rears look dope but the fronts....no thanks.
Granted, the convex rpf1 (in 17x8.5" at least) has better brake clearance than the 17x9, but I doubt there's a big break kit hiding back there...
Granted, the convex rpf1 (in 17x8.5" at least) has better brake clearance than the 17x9, but I doubt there's a big break kit hiding back there...
Rotary Enthusiast
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 885
Likes: 2
From: Canberra - Aus
Gotta disagree. There us nothing hot about convex (rpf1 in 8.5 +30 fitment) wheels. The rears look dope but the fronts....no thanks.
Granted, the convex rpf1 (in 17x8.5" at least) has better brake clearance than the 17x9, but I doubt there's a big break kit hiding back there...
Granted, the convex rpf1 (in 17x8.5" at least) has better brake clearance than the 17x9, but I doubt there's a big break kit hiding back there...
