Pics Request FC with RPF1's
08-07-11, 06:00 AM
#51
Rotary Vtak
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 110
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
but to the stock fender i can fit 255> interesting. that would require a really good roll and excellent pulling of the fenders
08-15-11, 06:42 PM
#54
I'll probably be picking up a set of these in the next few months.
17x9 +22 with a 235/45/17 square fitment.
Probably going to just buy an Eastwood Fender Roller.
Anyone know if the 9's up front with a +22 offset will have any problems with the suspension components or am I going to need to run some spacers? I'm not to worried about rolling and pulling the fenders. Thanks
17x9 +22 with a 235/45/17 square fitment.
Probably going to just buy an Eastwood Fender Roller.
Anyone know if the 9's up front with a +22 offset will have any problems with the suspension components or am I going to need to run some spacers? I'm not to worried about rolling and pulling the fenders. Thanks
08-24-11, 08:10 PM
#65
I know when I was looking for wheels for my car I searched and searched for pictures, so now that I have them here's mine:
Rears: 17x10 with Nitto NT05R drag radials in 275/40/17 with MMR camber adjusters and BC coilovers
Fronts: 17x8.5 with Nitto NT05 in 235/40/17 with BC coilovers and some negative camber
Fenders are rolled flat all around (used Eastwood fender roller)
The rears definitely stick out an inch but I like the look personally. I could run more negative camber in the rear but then my contact patch would be tiny when the suspension compresses.
Rears: 17x10 with Nitto NT05R drag radials in 275/40/17 with MMR camber adjusters and BC coilovers
Fronts: 17x8.5 with Nitto NT05 in 235/40/17 with BC coilovers and some negative camber
Fenders are rolled flat all around (used Eastwood fender roller)
The rears definitely stick out an inch but I like the look personally. I could run more negative camber in the rear but then my contact patch would be tiny when the suspension compresses.
08-24-11, 09:18 PM
#67
Rotary Enthusiast
Rears: 17x10 with Nitto NT05R drag radials in 275/40/17 with MMR camber adjusters and BC coilovers
Fronts: 17x8.5 with Nitto NT05 in 235/40/17 with BC coilovers and some negative camber
Fenders are rolled flat all around (used Eastwood fender roller)
The rears definitely stick out an inch but I like the look personally. I could run more negative camber in the rear but then my contact patch would be tiny when the suspension compresses.
Fronts: 17x8.5 with Nitto NT05 in 235/40/17 with BC coilovers and some negative camber
Fenders are rolled flat all around (used Eastwood fender roller)
The rears definitely stick out an inch but I like the look personally. I could run more negative camber in the rear but then my contact patch would be tiny when the suspension compresses.
08-26-11, 11:00 PM
#70
Gotta disagree. There us nothing hot about convex (rpf1 in 8.5 +30 fitment) wheels. The rears look dope but the fronts....no thanks.
Granted, the convex rpf1 (in 17x8.5" at least) has better brake clearance than the 17x9, but I doubt there's a big break kit hiding back there...
Granted, the convex rpf1 (in 17x8.5" at least) has better brake clearance than the 17x9, but I doubt there's a big break kit hiding back there...
08-27-11, 07:44 AM
#72
Rotary Enthusiast
Gotta disagree. There us nothing hot about convex (rpf1 in 8.5 +30 fitment) wheels. The rears look dope but the fronts....no thanks.
Granted, the convex rpf1 (in 17x8.5" at least) has better brake clearance than the 17x9, but I doubt there's a big break kit hiding back there...
Granted, the convex rpf1 (in 17x8.5" at least) has better brake clearance than the 17x9, but I doubt there's a big break kit hiding back there...
