2nd Generation Non-Technical and pictures Show off your car & view 2nd gen RX-7 pictures here.

my meshies got fat

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 7, 2010 | 05:56 PM
  #1  
cuda_06's Avatar
Thread Starter
Full Member
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 58
Likes: 0
From: Amarillo, Texas
my meshies got fat

They fattened up both in size and weight. You can feel the weight/width difference just driving down the street. I got a good deal on these but I doubt they will end up staying on the car. It's just too much for a NA vert.



BTW, the wheels are chrome Voxx Misanos. 17x8 front and 17x9 in the rear with 245-45-17 front and 275-40-17 rear.

Last edited by cuda_06; Mar 7, 2010 at 05:58 PM. Reason: added specs
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2010 | 07:30 PM
  #2  
ineedfc's Avatar
disturbing the peace
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 357
Likes: 0
From: sussex, wi
so add more power and bigger brakes. those wheels are sick, clean car.
Reply
Old Mar 8, 2010 | 12:50 AM
  #3  
rotordad's Avatar
The Big Ugly!
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 867
Likes: 0
From: Fredericksburg, Va
I think they are good looking wheels!
Reply
Old Mar 8, 2010 | 12:52 AM
  #4  
Hypertek's Avatar
Slowpoke
Tenured Member 05 Years
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,273
Likes: 6
From: Socal
looks too meaty on the car imo, thats a big stagger too
Reply
Old Mar 8, 2010 | 01:37 AM
  #5  
need RX7's Avatar
Listen to King Diamond.
Tenured Member: 15 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,859
Likes: 13
From: Sterling Heights, MI
Lower + slightly skinnier tires would look good I think.
Reply
Old Mar 8, 2010 | 01:45 AM
  #6  
KompressorLOgic's Avatar
I
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 3,755
Likes: 12
From: Spanaway, WA
what size are those tires?
Reply
Old Mar 8, 2010 | 02:06 AM
  #7  
Brody8877's Avatar
#FakeCarEnthusaist
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,817
Likes: 10
From: San Francisco
Originally Posted by kompressorlogic
what size are those tires?
17x8 are 245-45-17
17x9 are 275-40-17

he posted the size up right under the pics.
Reply
Old Mar 8, 2010 | 10:04 AM
  #8  
lonewolfrx's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member: 20 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 783
Likes: 2
From: Las Vegas
I think it would look nicers with skinnier tires. Maybe some slightly stretched ones would work.

If you ever want to get rid of them ill take em haha..

They look great tho.
Reply
Old Mar 8, 2010 | 08:37 PM
  #9  
HotRodMex's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 548
Likes: 0
From: San Luis Obispo, CA
Tire size is probably why it feels slower. The wheels are taller, so it's like you geared up the rear end.
Reply
Old Mar 8, 2010 | 10:32 PM
  #10  
NoPistons!'s Avatar
Tango Down
Tenured Member 05 Years
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 2,895
Likes: 3
From: SC/NC
They dont go well with the car at all.
Reply
Old Mar 9, 2010 | 03:08 AM
  #11  
DC 91 fc3s's Avatar
INNOVATOR NOT IMITATOR
Tenured Member 05 Years
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,254
Likes: 0
From: LA 626
wow 275 in the rear??? how did that fit????
Reply
Old Mar 9, 2010 | 07:42 AM
  #12  
Dltreezan's Avatar
My Bick is Digger
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 3,509
Likes: 2
From: Raleigh, NC
they look alright...
Reply
Old Mar 9, 2010 | 01:21 PM
  #13  
funkjaw's Avatar
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 2,515
Likes: 4
From: San Jose, CA (NorCal/S.F. Bay Area)
Screw looks, how does the car feel? They are probably too wide in the back and I bet the car pushes. What is the offset on those things?
Reply
Old Mar 9, 2010 | 05:45 PM
  #14  
cuda_06's Avatar
Thread Starter
Full Member
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 58
Likes: 0
From: Amarillo, Texas
Yeah, I can't do looks over functionality for too long myself. The wheels have already been pulled and the stock BBS are back on. It felt like a slug on the road in all aspects.

BTW, the offset is 20 at all four corners.
Reply
Old Mar 10, 2010 | 02:08 PM
  #15  
funkjaw's Avatar
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 2,515
Likes: 4
From: San Jose, CA (NorCal/S.F. Bay Area)
Along with the poor handling I bet those things are far heavier than the stock BBS too which is never a good thing. So what rims do you have in mind next?
Reply
Old Mar 10, 2010 | 02:36 PM
  #16  
Nick_d_TII's Avatar
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,620
Likes: 6
From: Beaverton, OR
I'm confused? It's too much tire? I thought a large contact patch is good for handling?
Why would the car push any more than with other tires? It doesn't have a spool or welded diff.
It should grip fine with those tires you just need more power. I bet it would pull higher g forces with those tires than the stock skinnies...
Reply
Old Mar 10, 2010 | 03:39 PM
  #17  
FC_EDDIE's Avatar
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,983
Likes: 0
From: So Cal
Try a 235/40/17 rear and 225/40/17 in the front...nice flush look and plenty of grip for a NA... even turbo if the tires are good
Reply
Old Mar 10, 2010 | 05:09 PM
  #18  
FirebirdSlayer666's Avatar
Famous Taillights
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 3,443
Likes: 2
From: Hagerstown, MD
Offset is probably a little low in the front. A great tire set up would really be 235's up front and 255's in the back for 8" and 9" wheels but with an NA(vert at that), anything over stock sizes should feel pretty planted.
Reply
Old Mar 10, 2010 | 07:58 PM
  #19  
cuda_06's Avatar
Thread Starter
Full Member
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 58
Likes: 0
From: Amarillo, Texas
Originally Posted by funkjaw
Along with the poor handling I bet those things are far heavier than the stock BBS too which is never a good thing. So what rims do you have in mind next?
I don't know, it just depends upon what I find, what day of the week it is, etc...
Reply
Old Mar 11, 2010 | 12:04 AM
  #20  
mrquach's Avatar
cruisin in my zoom zoom
Tenured Member: 15 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 100
Likes: 0
From: so cal
does it make the vert feel slower?
Reply
Old Mar 11, 2010 | 10:53 AM
  #21  
digitalsolo's Avatar
RX-347
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,115
Likes: 1
From: Fort Wayne, IN
Why in the hell do people keep wanting to put tiny tires on the back? At the very least, you could go big enough to match all you can fit out front (with appears to be a 245 in this case, though it's hard to see your fender clearance under compression in the pictures.)

I would agree that a slightly shorter (sidewall aspect) front tire would look better however, that setup looks a little "off" up front for some reason.

I'd think a 245/35/17 would clean up the look up front quite a bit.

I run a 275/40/17 out back (17x9 +35ET) and a 235/40/17 up front (17x7 +35ET), both fit fine and the stagger doesn't bother me a bit on the street. I do need the traction out back though.

Apparently everyone running the OMGWTFBBQ9000 stretch and poke setups aren't making any power or don't much care for traction...
Reply
Old Mar 11, 2010 | 02:12 PM
  #22  
funkjaw's Avatar
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 2,515
Likes: 4
From: San Jose, CA (NorCal/S.F. Bay Area)
Originally Posted by Nick_d_TII
I'm confused? It's too much tire? I thought a large contact patch is good for handling?
Why would the car push any more than with other tires? It doesn't have a spool or welded diff.
It should grip fine with those tires you just need more power. I bet it would pull higher g forces with those tires than the stock skinnies...
From my experience if traction is too great in the back it tends to make the car push/understeer.
Reply
Old Mar 11, 2010 | 02:30 PM
  #23  
LargeOrangeFont's Avatar
Fistful of steel
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 2,202
Likes: 27
From: OC, So Cal
Yes, that tall of a tire on an NA will really cut into the accelleration because it is lowering (numerically) the effective final drive ratio. Also, tire stagger that big will make a NA car push at the limit.

I had 245/45/17s in the rear and 235/40/17s in front all on 17X9 +24 wheels. The car pushed noticeably on corner exit, and it was hard to get the car to steer off power. It also felt a bit sluggish.

I switched to 235/40/17s in the rear and the car got thought the gears much better due to shorter effective final drive, and the push I had went away.

Aside from looks, staggered tires on an NA car is probably not needed. On a turbo car, or V8 swap, it is probably a good idea.
Reply
Old Mar 11, 2010 | 09:41 PM
  #24  
t24todd's Avatar
RE_p Rotors
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 950
Likes: 0
From: Newport News/Fredericksburg
265/35/18 +35 9.5
225/35/18 +35 8.5
handles great bit understeer but stays planted in turns(needed when boost is coming online)

way to much meat on a vert even a built one at that... sell em and get a set of BBS RMs 17" 225/235 combo
Reply
Old Mar 11, 2010 | 09:54 PM
  #25  
turboIIrotary's Avatar
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member: 15 Years
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,618
Likes: 3
From: dayton,ohio
Originally Posted by digitalsolo
Why in the hell do people keep wanting to put tiny tires on the back? At the very least, you could go big enough to match all you can fit out front (with appears to be a 245 in this case, though it's hard to see your fender clearance under compression in the pictures.)

I would agree that a slightly shorter (sidewall aspect) front tire would look better however, that setup looks a little "off" up front for some reason.

I'd think a 245/35/17 would clean up the look up front quite a bit.

I run a 275/40/17 out back (17x9 +35ET) and a 235/40/17 up front (17x7 +35ET), both fit fine and the stagger doesn't bother me a bit on the street. I do need the traction out back though.

Apparently everyone running the OMGWTFBBQ9000 stretch and poke setups aren't making any power or don't much care for traction...
The car won't handle correctly with meaty tires out back. Try to go fast through a turn and tell me what your car does.
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:42 AM.