RX7Club.com - Mazda RX7 Forum

RX7Club.com - Mazda RX7 Forum (https://www.rx7club.com/)
-   2nd Generation Non-Technical and pictures (https://www.rx7club.com/2nd-generation-non-technical-pictures-198/)
-   -   my meshies got fat (https://www.rx7club.com/2nd-generation-non-technical-pictures-198/my-meshies-got-fat-891256/)

cuda_06 03-07-10 05:56 PM

my meshies got fat
 
They fattened up both in size and weight. You can feel the weight/width difference just driving down the street. I got a good deal on these but I doubt they will end up staying on the car. It's just too much for a NA vert.

http://i91.photobucket.com/albums/k3...0/100_1451.jpg

BTW, the wheels are chrome Voxx Misanos. 17x8 front and 17x9 in the rear with 245-45-17 front and 275-40-17 rear.

ineedfc 03-07-10 07:30 PM

so add more power and bigger brakes. those wheels are sick, clean car.

rotordad 03-08-10 12:50 AM

I think they are good looking wheels!

Hypertek 03-08-10 12:52 AM

looks too meaty on the car imo, thats a big stagger too

need RX7 03-08-10 01:37 AM

Lower + slightly skinnier tires would look good I think.

KompressorLOgic 03-08-10 01:45 AM

what size are those tires?

Brody8877 03-08-10 02:06 AM


Originally Posted by kompressorlogic (Post 9853001)
what size are those tires?

17x8 are 245-45-17
17x9 are 275-40-17

he posted the size up right under the pics.

lonewolfrx 03-08-10 10:04 AM

I think it would look nicers with skinnier tires. Maybe some slightly stretched ones would work.

If you ever want to get rid of them ill take em haha..

They look great tho.

HotRodMex 03-08-10 08:37 PM

Tire size is probably why it feels slower. The wheels are taller, so it's like you geared up the rear end.

NoPistons! 03-08-10 10:32 PM

They dont go well with the car at all.

DC 91 fc3s 03-09-10 03:08 AM

wow 275 in the rear??? how did that fit????

Dltreezan 03-09-10 07:42 AM

they look alright...

funkjaw 03-09-10 01:21 PM

Screw looks, how does the car feel? They are probably too wide in the back and I bet the car pushes. What is the offset on those things?

cuda_06 03-09-10 05:45 PM

Yeah, I can't do looks over functionality for too long myself. The wheels have already been pulled and the stock BBS are back on. It felt like a slug on the road in all aspects.

BTW, the offset is 20 at all four corners.

funkjaw 03-10-10 02:08 PM

Along with the poor handling I bet those things are far heavier than the stock BBS too which is never a good thing. So what rims do you have in mind next?

Nick_d_TII 03-10-10 02:36 PM

I'm confused? It's too much tire? I thought a large contact patch is good for handling?
Why would the car push any more than with other tires? It doesn't have a spool or welded diff.
It should grip fine with those tires you just need more power. I bet it would pull higher g forces with those tires than the stock skinnies...

FC_EDDIE 03-10-10 03:39 PM

Try a 235/40/17 rear and 225/40/17 in the front...nice flush look and plenty of grip for a NA... even turbo if the tires are good

FirebirdSlayer666 03-10-10 05:09 PM

Offset is probably a little low in the front. A great tire set up would really be 235's up front and 255's in the back for 8" and 9" wheels but with an NA(vert at that), anything over stock sizes should feel pretty planted.

cuda_06 03-10-10 07:58 PM


Originally Posted by funkjaw (Post 9858468)
Along with the poor handling I bet those things are far heavier than the stock BBS too which is never a good thing. So what rims do you have in mind next?

I don't know, it just depends upon what I find, what day of the week it is, etc...

mrquach 03-11-10 12:04 AM

does it make the vert feel slower?

digitalsolo 03-11-10 10:53 AM

Why in the hell do people keep wanting to put tiny tires on the back? At the very least, you could go big enough to match all you can fit out front (with appears to be a 245 in this case, though it's hard to see your fender clearance under compression in the pictures.)

I would agree that a slightly shorter (sidewall aspect) front tire would look better however, that setup looks a little "off" up front for some reason.

I'd think a 245/35/17 would clean up the look up front quite a bit.

I run a 275/40/17 out back (17x9 +35ET) and a 235/40/17 up front (17x7 +35ET), both fit fine and the stagger doesn't bother me a bit on the street. I do need the traction out back though.

Apparently everyone running the OMGWTFBBQ9000 stretch and poke setups aren't making any power or don't much care for traction...

funkjaw 03-11-10 02:12 PM


Originally Posted by Nick_d_TII (Post 9858538)
I'm confused? It's too much tire? I thought a large contact patch is good for handling?
Why would the car push any more than with other tires? It doesn't have a spool or welded diff.
It should grip fine with those tires you just need more power. I bet it would pull higher g forces with those tires than the stock skinnies...

From my experience if traction is too great in the back it tends to make the car push/understeer.

LargeOrangeFont 03-11-10 02:30 PM

Yes, that tall of a tire on an NA will really cut into the accelleration because it is lowering (numerically) the effective final drive ratio. Also, tire stagger that big will make a NA car push at the limit.

I had 245/45/17s in the rear and 235/40/17s in front all on 17X9 +24 wheels. The car pushed noticeably on corner exit, and it was hard to get the car to steer off power. It also felt a bit sluggish.

I switched to 235/40/17s in the rear and the car got thought the gears much better due to shorter effective final drive, and the push I had went away.

Aside from looks, staggered tires on an NA car is probably not needed. On a turbo car, or V8 swap, it is probably a good idea.

t24todd 03-11-10 09:41 PM

265/35/18 +35 9.5
225/35/18 +35 8.5
handles great bit understeer but stays planted in turns(needed when boost is coming online)

way to much meat on a vert even a built one at that... sell em and get a set of BBS RMs 17" 225/235 combo

turboIIrotary 03-11-10 09:54 PM


Originally Posted by digitalsolo (Post 9860537)
Why in the hell do people keep wanting to put tiny tires on the back? At the very least, you could go big enough to match all you can fit out front (with appears to be a 245 in this case, though it's hard to see your fender clearance under compression in the pictures.)

I would agree that a slightly shorter (sidewall aspect) front tire would look better however, that setup looks a little "off" up front for some reason.

I'd think a 245/35/17 would clean up the look up front quite a bit.

I run a 275/40/17 out back (17x9 +35ET) and a 235/40/17 up front (17x7 +35ET), both fit fine and the stagger doesn't bother me a bit on the street. I do need the traction out back though.

Apparently everyone running the OMGWTFBBQ9000 stretch and poke setups aren't making any power or don't much care for traction...

The car won't handle correctly with meaty tires out back. Try to go fast through a turn and tell me what your car does.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:18 PM.


© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands