How to: Coverting N/A to TII

 
Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 6, 2002 | 05:45 PM
  #26  
wickedkin6s44's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 165
Likes: 0
From: Alabama
One thing that you guys are forgetting about this conversion is that we need lots and lots of $$$$$$$$$$.

But once were done...it will be all worth it!

wickedkin6s44
Old Nov 6, 2002 | 07:18 PM
  #27  
Turblown's Avatar
Turn up the boost
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 7,174
Likes: 236
From: Twin Cities, MN
have fun busting that n/a tranny
__________________
Rotary Performance Parts


Old Nov 6, 2002 | 07:42 PM
  #28  
Xentrix's Avatar
Kill Bear
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 106
Likes: 0
From: Asheville, NC
If I ever get all the parts I'll be doing a slightly different version of what Aaron did.

The writeup looks good, can't wait for pics.
Old Nov 6, 2002 | 11:39 PM
  #29  
mattrx7N/A's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 90
Likes: 0
From: OR
1. The N/A tranny is strong enough (its also lighter)
2. Its easier to pull the engine alone on a 2nd gen
3. Its much easier and cheaper to put a turbo on a N/A then to do the motor swap( just yank out all the wiring except the ignition stuff, take out all the injection stuff, buy a manifold from RB and a weber sidedraft carb and turbo hat from your local VW shop, get a turbo and manifold(very easy to make thanks to RB exhaust flange) get some intake tubing and done) yes its that simple.
Old Nov 7, 2002 | 08:06 PM
  #30  
GTR's Avatar
GTR
Senior Member
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 444
Likes: 0
From: San Jose, CA
actually, theres things you have to consider mattrx7. when you boost a N/A, it's not really built that way. If you would want it to be reliable, you're gonna have to build up the motor to accept boost reliablity. so why not get a turbo motor that's already has all that... makes sense ..
Old Nov 7, 2002 | 08:37 PM
  #31  
Turblown's Avatar
Turn up the boost
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 7,174
Likes: 236
From: Twin Cities, MN
Originally posted by mattrx7N/A
1. The N/A tranny is strong enough (its also lighter)
2. Its easier to pull the engine alone on a 2nd gen
3. Its much easier and cheaper to put a turbo on a N/A then to do the motor swap( just yank out all the wiring except the ignition stuff, take out all the injection stuff, buy a manifold from RB and a weber sidedraft carb and turbo hat from your local VW shop, get a turbo and manifold(very easy to make thanks to RB exhaust flange) get some intake tubing and done) yes its that simple.
so are u talking from experience or stuff u read on the internet.
I have heard of ppl breaking the n/a tranny every 2000miles from the abuse of a turbo motor.
Its gotta be hard to control the turbo with a carb, i've heard of lost of complications, its't it hard to compress air through a carb?
__________________
Rotary Performance Parts



Last edited by Turblown; Nov 7, 2002 at 08:48 PM.
Old Nov 7, 2002 | 10:16 PM
  #32  
mattrx7N/A's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 90
Likes: 0
From: OR
Im talking from experience on this, I guess if you like to pop the clutch at 6000 you will break the tranny. And also its very easy to run a turbo with the carb you just need common sense. If you stay under 12 psi run good gas and plugs an intercooler, retard the timing the N/A engine does fine. But hey the world hates poeple who are different so just keep doing your engine swaps.

-Matt
Old Nov 7, 2002 | 10:35 PM
  #33  
Turblown's Avatar
Turn up the boost
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 7,174
Likes: 236
From: Twin Cities, MN
Originally posted by mattrx7N/A
Im talking from experience on this, I guess if you like to pop the clutch at 6000 you will break the tranny. And also its very easy to run a turbo with the carb you just need common sense. If you stay under 12 psi run good gas and plugs an intercooler, retard the timing the N/A engine does fine. But hey the world hates poeple who are different so just keep doing your engine swaps.

-Matt
SO KEEP TO THE NORM, lol j/k do u have any pics of your setup?
Old Nov 7, 2002 | 10:46 PM
  #34  
mattrx7N/A's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 90
Likes: 0
From: OR
Im still waiting on the turbo for my current car but as soon as its done ill post some pics, ill put them on my thread: Cheap and Fast , as soon as possible. You can read about my 87 N/A (soon to be turbo) there.

-Matt
Old Nov 8, 2002 | 12:13 AM
  #35  
bcty's Avatar
Boost This!
Tenured Member 20 Years
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,935
Likes: 0
From: Nanaimo, B.C, Canada
so any clutch and flywheel from any year will fit into my 87 GX tranny? i thought they were a diffrent size?
Old Nov 8, 2002 | 03:33 PM
  #36  
chrispapas's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 184
Likes: 0
From: northwest Indiana,portage
nice job
Old Nov 9, 2002 | 11:54 PM
  #37  
RotorMike's Avatar
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
From: Chicago
If anyone is looking for a new ported second gen engine for this type of swap, I am selling one. Check out my thread under second gen parts. I have all the accessories needed, including a hi-po turbo, trans, digital fuel injection or the factory system, racing beat down pipe and so on. Let me know as I will be somewhat flexible on the price since I won't start my next project until I sell this drivetrain. Still in the car so I can prove what condition it is in.
Old Nov 12, 2002 | 03:04 AM
  #38  
Canadian Rotary Man's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 89
Likes: 0
From: Canada
Originally posted by GTR
actually, theres things you have to consider mattrx7. when you boost a N/A, it's not really built that way. If you would want it to be reliable, you're gonna have to build up the motor to accept boost reliablity. so why not get a turbo motor that's already has all that... makes sense ..
I have always had and intrest in turboing my NA engine. What do u mean by building it up to accept boost? How would u go about doing that?

Can't u just run a bit lower boost to make up for the higher compression of an NA engine?
Old Nov 12, 2002 | 12:44 PM
  #39  
RotorMike's Avatar
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
From: Chicago
The turbo engine has a lot of internal modifications to allow it to handle the boost and heat. I would never suggest running jmore than five pounds on a NA engine block.
Old Nov 13, 2002 | 01:31 AM
  #40  
Canadian Rotary Man's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 89
Likes: 0
From: Canada
5 pounds ain't much

what boost does a stock T2 run at?
Old Nov 13, 2002 | 10:34 AM
  #41  
RotorMike's Avatar
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
From: Chicago
a stock TII runs about 8 lbs, with a good downpipe and exhaust that jumps up to 9-10 lbs. I ran mine as high as 14 lbs. You can really feel the 10 pounds forcing you into your seat.
Old Nov 15, 2002 | 02:26 AM
  #42  
Canadian Rotary Man's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 89
Likes: 0
From: Canada
thanks
Old Nov 15, 2002 | 06:59 AM
  #43  
silverrotor's Avatar
Moderator
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 7,592
Likes: 5
From: Toronto, Corporate Canada
I'd like to know It a Turbo II Motor and Tranny will bolt directly to my GXL LSD Differential (of the same year).

I know the na Tranny cannot sustain the abuse the Turbo Motor dishes out but what about the na LSD as opposed to the Turbo Differential? Would It be recommended to swap out the na one to that of a Turbo one?

*edit* I'm aware the Drive Shafts have to be replace aswell.
Old Nov 15, 2002 | 10:05 AM
  #44  
RotorMike's Avatar
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
From: Chicago
the tranny will not last, but the rear dif should be ok up to 250 hp or so. Besides that it is almost a drop in change
Old Nov 15, 2002 | 11:27 AM
  #45  
Angel Guard Racing Team's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 20 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 975
Likes: 5
From: Puerto Rico Land Of The Fastest Rotaries
650 cfm #4011 holley marine, Racing beat TII intake manifold (No more waiting for Jay-Tech RIP) turbonetics pressurizer, aeromotive carburator fpr, a good fuel pump, TII turbocharger and exhaust manifold, blow off valve, early distribuitor, already existing trailing coils, some fittings, steel braided fuel lines and someone who can do the settings right.
Holley Marine 650 cfm: About $250.00
Aeromotive fpr: $150.00
Racing Beat Intake Manifold for TII: I got for $210.00
Braided lines: Depending on where you buy the price is per-foot
Fuel pump: I got a Walbro: $110.00
TII Turbo: I got for $150.00
I had the blow-off
Turbonetics pressurizer: $75.00
Fittings: $45.00
Distribuitor: $75.00
Settings: Go figure someone on your are who can do them (I got somebody)
Have fun!!!
Old Nov 17, 2002 | 03:54 PM
  #46  
Turblown's Avatar
Turn up the boost
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 7,174
Likes: 236
From: Twin Cities, MN
@ angel guard
no offense or anything but haven't u blown a handlful of engines? Does it have anything to do with have a carb instead of EFI?
Old Nov 18, 2002 | 03:39 PM
  #47  
ACTION RT's Avatar
G35 FTW
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,689
Likes: 0
From: Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
Go to my site.

http://members.rogers.com/rtsracing/intro.htm


has some before and after pics of my conversion.
Old Nov 19, 2002 | 06:31 PM
  #48  
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 69
Likes: 0
From: new york
well guys i have successfully done the swap that kabooski is talking about. and there is one very important aspect that everyone is forgeting. there are three major plugs inder the passengers side dash that will not mate between the 86-88 and the 89-91 harness and a few extra wires that need to be wired into the dash if anyone needs help with this email me (when u get to this point) and i will help you
Old Nov 19, 2002 | 10:20 PM
  #49  
RXTHIS's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
From: T.O. Canada
thanks.. I have been looking for a write up like this for months now. finially i can start planning.....
dave
Old Nov 22, 2002 | 08:02 AM
  #50  
hIGGI's Avatar
Moderator
Tenured Member: 25 Years
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 4,988
Likes: 18
From: Czech Republic [www.rx7cz.net]
Originally posted by Mykl
Oh, I have a recommendation.

I've not ever pulled an engine from an RX-7, but I would think that it would be much much easier to pull the engine and transmission both at the same time rather than trying to line the engine up with a transmission that's resting on a jack when you try to reinstall the engine.

I'm sure it would take a bit of maneuvering to get them both in and out at the same time, but overall I would think that it would make installation of the engine easier.

What are your thoughts on this? Do you think it would make it easier or more difficult?
Some guys are removing engine+transmission+front subframe all bolted together - lifting front of the car, not engine......



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:17 PM.