turbo choices for quick spool and 350hp goal?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 29, 2010 | 10:36 PM
  #1  
stevensimon's Avatar
Thread Starter
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 3,575
Likes: 6
From: salt lake ut
turbo choices for quick spool and 350hp goal?

title basically says what im after. does anyone have any constructive advice for turbo shopping?

goals are 350hp on stock ports and quick spool
Reply
Old Aug 29, 2010 | 11:16 PM
  #2  
Jobro's Avatar
SAE Junkie
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,287
Likes: 12
From: OZ/AU
For 350hp you'd be better off with a 12A in the car
Reply
Old Aug 29, 2010 | 11:45 PM
  #3  
stevensimon's Avatar
Thread Starter
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 3,575
Likes: 6
From: salt lake ut
So I can be more like you?
Reply
Old Aug 30, 2010 | 12:30 AM
  #4  
t-von's Avatar
Rotor Head Extreme
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 6,719
Likes: 26
From: Midland Texas
^ LOL! For some reason when installing a 20b, the assumption has always been for it to make max power. Power isn't everything and I wish some people would get that through their heads. The stock twins will do just fine at that level. If you want quicker spool...then I would go with a GT35r. This would be an insane midrange turbo for a 20b with the potential for more later. Depending on A/R size they can still make up to 500WHP (maxed out) on a 13b. The larger displacement of the 20b will only make it spool faster. If 350 is all you really care about, then just get the smallest A/R available or stick with the twins.
Reply
Old Aug 30, 2010 | 01:43 AM
  #5  
Jobro's Avatar
SAE Junkie
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,287
Likes: 12
From: OZ/AU
But seriously, any refreshed twin rotor 12A or 13B will do that number at 10psi and 7000rpm.

That is stockport + highflow FC turbo territory. Not $20000 engine swap to be slower than a factory car
Reply
Old Aug 30, 2010 | 04:21 AM
  #6  
rotorooter93fd's Avatar
YOUR TRIANGLE NIGHTMARE
Tenured Member 05 Years
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 807
Likes: 0
From: automotive purgatory
If he has 350whp then he wont be slower than the factory car.
Reply
Old Aug 30, 2010 | 10:54 AM
  #7  
t-von's Avatar
Rotor Head Extreme
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 6,719
Likes: 26
From: Midland Texas
Originally Posted by Jobro
But seriously, any refreshed twin rotor 12A or 13B will do that number at 10psi and 7000rpm.

That is stockport + highflow FC turbo territory. Not $20000 engine swap to be slower than a factory car

It's never going to make financial sense if you only try to justify the swap and base it on cost vs hp. We all know it's much cheaper to do what your suggesting. But seriously, if that's what he wanted then this thread would be in the 1st or 2nd gen section. That's his choice! For what he wants it wont cost nearly that much if you do the swap yourself. Plus the potential is endless once the engine is actually in the vehicle.
Reply
Old Aug 30, 2010 | 01:31 PM
  #8  
stevensimon's Avatar
Thread Starter
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 3,575
Likes: 6
From: salt lake ut
this is the turbo that i am looking at. suggestions on the turbine housing though? .84 or 1.00 ar divided or i could get the .96 undivided.

http://www.atpturbo.com/mm5/merchant...Category_Code=
Reply
Old Aug 30, 2010 | 01:48 PM
  #9  
Zero R's Avatar
Just in time to die
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 4,143
Likes: 2
From: look behind you
I shot you a PM, basically saying go with the .96 on the 20B as well as some other options.

~S~
Reply
Old Aug 31, 2010 | 03:43 PM
  #10  
hIGGI's Avatar
Moderator
Tenured Member: 25 Years
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 4,988
Likes: 18
From: Czech Republic [www.rx7cz.net]
Originally Posted by t-von
^ LOL! For some reason when installing a 20b, the assumption has always been for it to make max power. Power isn't everything and I wish some people would get that through their heads. The stock twins will do just fine at that level. If you want quicker spool...then I would go with a GT35r. This would be an insane midrange turbo for a 20b with the potential for more later. Depending on A/R size they can still make up to 500WHP (maxed out) on a 13b. The larger displacement of the 20b will only make it spool faster. If 350 is all you really care about, then just get the smallest A/R available or stick with the twins.
I am right now in process of installing my 1.06 A/R GT35R on streetported 20B, hopefully will have some results soon, whenever it works or not....

Its for my driftcar and spool and low-end response is the reason for switching from 13B to 20B and keeping same turbo....
Reply
Old Aug 31, 2010 | 07:17 PM
  #11  
t-von's Avatar
Rotor Head Extreme
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 6,719
Likes: 26
From: Midland Texas
Originally Posted by hIGGI
I am right now in process of installing my 1.06 A/R GT35R on streetported 20B, hopefully will have some results soon, whenever it works or not....

Its for my driftcar and spool and low-end response is the reason for switching from 13B to 20B and keeping same turbo....


I can't wait to see how responsive that combo will be. Will you have dyno info? I wanna see how much torque will be made down low.
Reply
Old Aug 31, 2010 | 11:47 PM
  #12  
stevensimon's Avatar
Thread Starter
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 3,575
Likes: 6
From: salt lake ut
thats what im building it for too. drifting is my hobby, torque is my friend. post the numbers when you get done..

also as i read on, i missed a very critical component in my turbo selection.. this particular turbo is not water cooled. does anyone think that this will be an issue or do you guys know of any suitable and similar turbos that have a water cooled cartridge?

thanks again
Reply
Old Sep 1, 2010 | 01:31 AM
  #13  
hIGGI's Avatar
Moderator
Tenured Member: 25 Years
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 4,988
Likes: 18
From: Czech Republic [www.rx7cz.net]
Originally Posted by t-von
I can't wait to see how responsive that combo will be. Will you have dyno info? I wanna see how much torque will be made down low.
Yes, i will try to get it dynoed, but it might be in 2011.
It will take me some time to break engine in and tune it.
Reply
Old Sep 10, 2010 | 05:45 PM
  #14  
Norwegian_rotary's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 475
Likes: 1
From: Oslo, Norway
The stock twins should easily make 350 bhp.. Give them around 15 psi boost and you will se that youre close to the 400bhp mark with the twins..

Singleturbo, go for the turbonetics t-66.. this is what i have in my racecar.. realy quick spool up.. i have full boost around 3k, and works great up to 8k when i starts to surge.. this will easily give you good 350 bhp's... and still good for around 500 if you want later..
Reply
Old Sep 14, 2010 | 10:55 AM
  #15  
stevensimon's Avatar
Thread Starter
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 3,575
Likes: 6
From: salt lake ut
rear turbo on the stock twins is hammered. compressor is full of oil.

how would a garrett gt4088 work out? im a little worried that the turbine side is a little big on it at 1.19 but there is a decent used one that is in my budget.
Reply
Old Sep 14, 2010 | 02:38 PM
  #16  
Norwegian_rotary's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 475
Likes: 1
From: Oslo, Norway
Originally Posted by stevensimon
rear turbo on the stock twins is hammered. compressor is full of oil.

how would a garrett gt4088 work out? im a little worried that the turbine side is a little big on it at 1.19 but there is a decent used one that is in my budget.
Never tried a garrett gt4088 before, but should be a lot better on the spool up than a gt42 that someone uses on those engines.. The turbo is better for outtakes around 500-600 hp i think. not for 350... the gt 35 with a bigg exhaust turbine might be the thing for you, but then you should have no smaller than a 60mm wastegate to contoll it.. anything else will be to small to be able to bypass the amount of exhaust from that engine...
Reply
Old Sep 16, 2010 | 12:54 AM
  #17  
ITSWILL's Avatar
Wiring Nightmare
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,714
Likes: 2
From: Ortonville, MI
I have the stock twins kicking around if you just decide to replace your bad turbo let me know. To start on my setup I have a t70 with a 1.15 at if I remember correctly. I should be getting back to this project shortly. Ill let you know how it works out if I finish anytime soon.
Reply
Old Sep 17, 2010 | 01:27 PM
  #18  
Norwegian_rotary's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 475
Likes: 1
From: Oslo, Norway
Originally Posted by ITSWILL
I have the stock twins kicking around if you just decide to replace your bad turbo let me know. To start on my setup I have a t70 with a 1.15 at if I remember correctly. I should be getting back to this project shortly. Ill let you know how it works out if I finish anytime soon.
The stock twins will be the best for his setup.. 14psi with stock twins and you will have around 350-400 bhp
Reply
Old Nov 15, 2010 | 12:04 AM
  #19  
Akagis_white_comet's Avatar
Hey...Cut it out!
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 2,067
Likes: 309
From: St Louis, MO
Just by optimizing the fuel/air/ignition maps in your standalone, the stock 20b twins at the stock 10psi should get you to 350 pretty easily. As most already know, a 300hp 20b is VERY underworked and 350 is still quite underworked too. For my build, a stable engine at the stock 10psi is the goal. With some luck, it'll be somewhere around 350hp and have torque to match. In one of the threads about getting them to work sequentially with a haltech, someone mentions that the FD twins can spool up to 15psi by 1700rpm when on a 13b, netting that FD around 350 at the wheels. I'd imagine that a 20b with its twins could spool up as quick or better.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
trickster
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
25
Jul 1, 2023 04:40 PM
ChrisRX8PR
Single Turbo RX-7's
18
Aug 21, 2015 01:56 PM
Wolf_
Single Turbo RX-7's
3
Aug 11, 2015 04:23 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:32 AM.