Controlling a 20B like a V6

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 26, 2002 | 03:02 AM
  #26  
peejay's Avatar
Old [Sch|F]ool
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 12,862
Likes: 568
From: Cleveland, Ohio, USA
Originally posted by j9fd3s
you wastespark the leading and trailing.

mike
Oh! I think I see what you mean. You're talking about running leading and trailing with no split.

Waste spark is something different altogether - that involves firing two different cylinders/chambers at the same time - one spark is at TDC compression stroke and the other one is just "wasted".
Reply
Old Jul 26, 2002 | 05:32 AM
  #27  
HyperRex's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 268
Likes: 37
From: San Francisco Bay Area, California
The last time I checked, the Motec does not run the split the same way the OEM computer does it.
Reply
Old Jul 26, 2002 | 09:41 AM
  #28  
The_HITman's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 80
Likes: 0
From: Sydney,NSW,Australia
peejay is right. It is not wastespark (one fires into exhaust cycle), it is parallel firing.

New Haltech does 3 and 4 rotor with full 3D trail control. Seq injection and oil metering pump control too.

Firing the Lead and Trail in parallel does not produce the best power in my experience. A few degrees of split generally have it running better under WOT depending on the motor, fuel and mods. At light throttle it does seem to run fractionally better when fired together, but HC emissions go up considerably. I also the split needs varying more with load than rpm.
Reply
Old Jul 26, 2002 | 10:55 AM
  #29  
j9fd3s's Avatar
Moderator
Community Builder
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 31,833
Likes: 3,232
From: https://www2.mazda.com/en/100th/
Originally posted by The_HITman
New Haltech does 3 and 4 rotor with full 3D trail control. Seq injection and oil metering pump control too.

Firing the Lead and Trail in parallel does not produce the best power in my experience. A few degrees of split generally have it running better under WOT depending on the motor, fuel and mods. At light throttle it does seem to run fractionally better when fired together, but HC emissions go up considerably. I also the split needs varying more with load than rpm.
when does the new haltech come out, is it months or years away? i would like to have the split, but wiring up 2 seperate ems's and programming both was more hassle than its worth at the time i started the project

mike

Last edited by j9fd3s; Jul 26, 2002 at 10:57 AM.
Reply
Old Jul 26, 2002 | 08:44 PM
  #30  
Evil Aviator's Avatar
Rotorhead
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 9,136
Likes: 39
From: Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
Originally posted by j9fd3s
im not 100% on this but i think the lemans engines fire l and t together but the late trailing does vary.
I'm not sure about the Japanese teams, but Downing Atlanta fires them simultaneously through a single M800.

Originally posted by Kurgan
I've been hearing that the motec m800 runs split timing on the 20b. They claim it on their website.
Do you have a link for that? It will only run split timing on a 2-rotor, but will run a 3-rotor with simultaneous timing per race specs.

Originally posted by 10sec rx7
i dont think the m800 can run the split, ill try and find out for you
Roger Mandeville said that the M800 will NOT run the split on a 20B, so I'm going to assume that he knows what he is talking about.
Reply
Old Jul 26, 2002 | 08:54 PM
  #31  
j9fd3s's Avatar
Moderator
Community Builder
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 31,833
Likes: 3,232
From: https://www2.mazda.com/en/100th/
the way that the m800 is wired it can't do the split the leading coil pack and trailing coil pack are wired together http://www.motec.com.au/drawings/m16.pdf
you can see the 3 ignition outputs are shared between l and t

mike
Reply
Old Jul 26, 2002 | 10:30 PM
  #32  
The_HITman's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 80
Likes: 0
From: Sydney,NSW,Australia
The new one is weeks away over here for a very small number of units, and only locally near Haltech so each install can be checked on for bugs. I have been playing with one on a 13B for a while and the ECU is getting there very rapidly. Just small stuff to sort.

You guys in the US should see it in couple of months.
Reply
Old Jul 27, 2002 | 03:24 PM
  #33  
j9fd3s's Avatar
Moderator
Community Builder
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 31,833
Likes: 3,232
From: https://www2.mazda.com/en/100th/
cool thats fast, i was planning on 20b stage 2 next year (making things look good, polishing, paint etc) maybe i'll redo the ems too.

mike
Reply
Old Aug 6, 2002 | 09:15 PM
  #34  
NZConvertible's Avatar
I'm a boost creep...
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 15,608
Likes: 8
From: Auckland, New Zealand
Originally posted by Jeff20B
If there was a cheap way to add a 180º wasted spark to each L plug (like '86+ 13Bs)
There is no way you can run a wasted spark system on a triple rotor (i.e. fire all three leading or trailing plugs together), because when one rotor fires, one of the other rotors is still in the compression phase (the other is in exhaust).
...do you think it would help the power and emissions even more?
Wasted spark has no effect on either performance or emissions, because the wasted spark is just firing into exhaust gases. It is purely a way to make the ignition system (including the ECU) simpler by reducing the number of coils, ignitors and ECU drivers required.
Reply
Old Aug 7, 2002 | 01:42 AM
  #35  
Jeff20B's Avatar
Lapping = Fapping
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 15,725
Likes: 91
From: Near Seattle
I'm building a 20B ignition and the info here has been very helpful. On my old 2 rotor engine, adding wasted spark has helped power and reduced emissions (old '70s carb), so I was hoping it could be done on a 20B as well. Too bad. Simply prototyping a 20B ignition (without L/T split) has been rather challenging in its own way. Forget the split (for now); I'll be running it like a V6.

Last edited by Jeff20B; Aug 7, 2002 at 01:45 AM.
Reply
Old Aug 8, 2002 | 12:36 AM
  #36  
Evil Aviator's Avatar
Rotorhead
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 9,136
Likes: 39
From: Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
Originally posted by Jeff20B
I'm building a 20B ignition and the info here has been very helpful. On my old 2 rotor engine, adding wasted spark has helped power and reduced emissions (old '70s carb), so I was hoping it could be done on a 20B as well.
Assuming you mean "split timing" as opposed to "wasted spark"...

Yes, the split timing was better for the carburated engines, as simultaneous firing could lead to the infamous colliding flame front problem. Modern EFI engines do not have this problem.
Reply
Old Aug 8, 2002 | 10:23 AM
  #37  
Jeff20B's Avatar
Lapping = Fapping
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 15,725
Likes: 91
From: Near Seattle
Uh oh, maybe I'd better have a little split, huh?
Reply
Old Aug 14, 2002 | 04:29 AM
  #38  
peejay's Avatar
Old [Sch|F]ool
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 12,862
Likes: 568
From: Cleveland, Ohio, USA
Us 1st-genners (and pre-RX-7 folk) have been converting to waste spark with two different camps - one mindset uses an additional ignitor and factory coil, another uses a single MSD to drive two MSD coils... either way each leading plug has its own coil and they fire simultaneously.

Anyway, pending the finding of an intact early V6 model, I might have a way of making a CHEAP setup to convert a distributor to fire a 20B in non-split mode... and possibly also with factory-style fixed split if one is willing to make their own distributor cap.
Reply
Old Aug 14, 2002 | 07:56 AM
  #39  
Node's Avatar
Eats, Sleeps, Dreams Rotary
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 3,383
Likes: 3
From: Stinson Beach, Ca
Originally posted by Evil Aviator
the infamous colliding flame front problem.
Would you mind educating me of this problem?
Reply
Old Aug 14, 2002 | 02:11 PM
  #40  
Jeff20B's Avatar
Lapping = Fapping
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 15,725
Likes: 91
From: Near Seattle
Me too. I'd very much like to go with no split and a carb.
Reply
Old Aug 14, 2002 | 11:48 PM
  #41  
Evil Aviator's Avatar
Rotorhead
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 9,136
Likes: 39
From: Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
Originally posted by Node

Would you mind educating me of this problem?
Also known as the "cross triggering" problem in older S1 RX-7 breakerless ignitions, it's when the L & T fire at the same time. This can create two flame fronts (one from each plug) which collide and generate perpindicular explosive waves more commonly known as "detonation" or "knock".

I don't know why carb engines are more prone to detonation with simultaneous ignition, while EFI engines run just fine. Maybe one of our technical gurus can explain this?
Reply
Old Aug 15, 2002 | 11:00 AM
  #42  
j9fd3s's Avatar
Moderator
Community Builder
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 31,833
Likes: 3,232
From: https://www2.mazda.com/en/100th/
i've been reading my rotary engine book, and of course
this isn't mentioned. they do show that when knock occurs it is right next to the trailing spark plug.

mike
Reply
Old Aug 15, 2002 | 12:46 PM
  #43  
Jeff20B's Avatar
Lapping = Fapping
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 15,725
Likes: 91
From: Near Seattle
Series 1? Well that affects the '80 style only then. Anyway, I've been back to the drawing board and decided to go with an earlier design that has split.
Reply
Old Aug 15, 2002 | 02:40 PM
  #44  
peejay's Avatar
Old [Sch|F]ool
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 12,862
Likes: 568
From: Cleveland, Ohio, USA
The problem with the '80 was due to the fact that both ignitors were encased in one unit. I never had a problem...
Reply
Old Aug 15, 2002 | 02:41 PM
  #45  
peejay's Avatar
Old [Sch|F]ool
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 12,862
Likes: 568
From: Cleveland, Ohio, USA
The problem with the '80 was due to the fact that both ignitors were encased in one unit. I never had a problem...

But I did find out that trailing ignition did NOT want to be more than 10 degrees BTDC under full advance, no matter WHAT. That may have had something to do with it. I seem to recall that later engines have altered spark plug locations.
Reply
Old Aug 15, 2002 | 03:35 PM
  #46  
j9fd3s's Avatar
Moderator
Community Builder
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 31,833
Likes: 3,232
From: https://www2.mazda.com/en/100th/
as the rotor moves the trailing side of the combustion chamber is getting smaller and the leading side is getting bigger. this means the flame front moves toward the leading side.

mike
Reply
Old Aug 15, 2002 | 10:29 PM
  #47  
Jeff20B's Avatar
Lapping = Fapping
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 15,725
Likes: 91
From: Near Seattle
And the hard to ignite stuff stays in the trailing side.
Reply
Old Aug 16, 2002 | 06:27 PM
  #48  
j9fd3s's Avatar
Moderator
Community Builder
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 31,833
Likes: 3,232
From: https://www2.mazda.com/en/100th/
actually it may have something to do with the shape of the rotor recess. the 13b's have a squarish shape recess, and the 12a's have one that tapered on the trailing side. this taper raises the working gas pressure on the trailing side, that and a misfire could be the culprit, no?

mike
Reply
Old Aug 17, 2002 | 12:17 PM
  #49  
Jeff20B's Avatar
Lapping = Fapping
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 15,725
Likes: 91
From: Near Seattle
This is all very interesting. There were no fuel injected 12As in the US. They'd always need a split. Since the 20B uses 13B sized and shaped rotors, do you think it still requires a split if carbed?
Reply
Old Aug 17, 2002 | 12:57 PM
  #50  
peejay's Avatar
Old [Sch|F]ool
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 12,862
Likes: 568
From: Cleveland, Ohio, USA
The timing requirements don't care if it's EFI or injected.
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:14 AM.