cant get more than 10psi boost why?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 28, 2003 | 10:59 AM
  #51  
now's Avatar
now
Thread Starter
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 1,825
Likes: 4
From: alberta, canada
Originally posted by j9fd3s
now: hmm maybe your ic setup stops flowing, mine kinda felt like that, now that i have removed the 270degree ic pipe is a lot better.

if the ic were restricting flow that much i would have
thought that the turbo side pressure would have gone much higher with the waste gate disabled.

matt
Reply
Old Oct 28, 2003 | 11:33 AM
  #52  
j9fd3s's Avatar
Moderator
Community Builder
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 31,835
Likes: 3,232
From: https://www2.mazda.com/en/100th/
Originally posted by now
if the ic were restricting flow that much i would have
thought that the turbo side pressure would have gone much higher with the waste gate disabled.

matt
hmm good point. well maybe at 5-6k rpms they cant make anymore than that?

mike
Reply
Old Oct 28, 2003 | 03:06 PM
  #53  
RotorMotor's Avatar
DRIVE THE ROTARY SPORTS
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 4,150
Likes: 0
From: CA (Bay Area)
Originally posted by j9fd3s
now: hmm maybe your ic setup stops flowing, mine kinda felt like that, now that i have removed the 270degree ic pipe is a lot better.

rotormotor: it did 220rwhp with the 270pipe at 10psi, now with the better coils, and ic piping it feels a lot better, i'm going to say like 240-250rwhp@7psi.
we do have a stock ecu 20b running around to dyno too, so we can see where we are supposed to be
i hope you meant 320-350HP...not 220-250HP ? the stock FD's are 255HP...... even if you meant 300's it is still not much better than a modded FD... haha we need more boost people...otherwise the 20b is not worth it!!! oh, by the way does anyone have an idea of what a really rough HP estimate would be if we could actually get 15-16psi on a stock motor (assuming we deal with the lack of fuel)? thakns

hey matt, that was my other question... with the modded RE Amemiya computer that your running how would you deal with delivering the extra fuel to support 16psi? wouldnt you have to increase injector size? and how would the coputer be able to deal with that?

Last edited by RotorMotor; Oct 28, 2003 at 03:12 PM.
Reply
Old Oct 28, 2003 | 06:29 PM
  #54  
t-von's Avatar
Rotor Head Extreme
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 6,719
Likes: 26
From: Midland Texas
Originally posted by now
if the ic were restricting flow that much i would have
thought that the turbo side pressure would have gone much higher with the waste gate disabled.

matt

Hey I did a test of the my smic & piping today to see how efficient they are. You might want to check it and hook up your boost gauges the way I did. This should really let you know how efficent your piping & intercooler really is.


https://www.rx7club.com/showthread.p...hreadid=236643
Reply
Old Oct 28, 2003 | 06:55 PM
  #55  
now's Avatar
now
Thread Starter
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 1,825
Likes: 4
From: alberta, canada
Originally posted by RotorMotor


hey matt, that was my other question... with the modded RE Amemiya computer that your running how would you deal with delivering the extra fuel to support 16psi? wouldnt you have to increase injector size? and how would the coputer be able to deal with that?
the RE Amemiya computer is setup for the most boost
that the stock injectors will allow, nothing else needs to
be done with a stock cosmo other than open 3" exhaust
and intake.

matt
Reply
Old Oct 28, 2003 | 06:59 PM
  #56  
now's Avatar
now
Thread Starter
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 1,825
Likes: 4
From: alberta, canada
Originally posted by t-von
Hey I did a test of the my smic & piping today to see how efficient they are. You might want to check it and hook up your boost gauges the way I did. This should really let you know how efficent your piping & intercooler really is.


https://www.rx7club.com/showthread.p...hreadid=236643
i did the same thing as you but i didn't have to drill
any holes
you said that the stock ic and piping sucks,,, a
3 psi loss in the ic and pipes is what i would call really
good, you would be hard pressed to find better.
The worst that i seen with my setup on the 20b was a
total loss of 7 psi at 7500 rpm!

matt
Reply
Old Oct 28, 2003 | 07:37 PM
  #57  
j9fd3s's Avatar
Moderator
Community Builder
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 31,835
Likes: 3,232
From: https://www2.mazda.com/en/100th/
Originally posted by RotorMotor
i hope you meant 320-350HP...not 220-250HP ? the stock FD's are 255HP...... even if you meant 300's it is still not much better than a modded FD... haha we need more boost people...otherwise the 20b is not worth it!!! oh, by the way does anyone have an idea of what a really rough HP estimate would be if we could actually get 15-16psi on a stock motor (assuming we deal with the lack of fuel)? thakns

hey matt, that was my other question... with the modded RE Amemiya computer that your running how would you deal with delivering the extra fuel to support 16psi? wouldnt you have to increase injector size? and how would the coputer be able to deal with that?
it did 220rwhp a year ago with the e6k, i actually do have a dyno sheet for 139rwhp@12psi with a 20b. its faster now, and runs a lot better. at this point i'm just happy to have it running well enough to be a daily driver. it does need to go to the dyno for final tuning but i'm not super concerned with the # it puts down.

mike
Reply
Old Oct 29, 2003 | 08:35 PM
  #58  
t-von's Avatar
Rotor Head Extreme
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 6,719
Likes: 26
From: Midland Texas
Originally posted by now

The worst that i seen with my setup on the 20b was a
total loss of 7 psi at 7500 rpm!

matt

Damn 7psi loss Do you have any pics of your setup?



Hey Mike, That dyno run of the 139 rwhp at 12psi on a 20b. Did you have really low compression or something at the time?
Reply
Old Oct 29, 2003 | 11:06 PM
  #59  
now's Avatar
now
Thread Starter
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 1,825
Likes: 4
From: alberta, canada
I am using a Porsche intercooler and i think the big loss
problem might be there, the end tanks really suck on it
i think i am going to cut them off and put 4 inch pipes
on it and see what it does

matt
Reply
Old Oct 29, 2003 | 11:42 PM
  #60  
RotorMotor's Avatar
DRIVE THE ROTARY SPORTS
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 4,150
Likes: 0
From: CA (Bay Area)
would that really help that much? i have a feeling its mostly piping and the internal structure of the intercooler. let me know how it turns out though. how big is the IC? got any pictures?
Reply
Old Oct 30, 2003 | 12:17 AM
  #61  
MtnRacer's Avatar
infini guru
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,183
Likes: 0
From: Sunnyvale, CA
Originally posted by t-von
Damn 7psi loss Do you have any pics of your setup?



Hey Mike, That dyno run of the 139 rwhp at 12psi on a 20b. Did you have really low compression or something at the time?
the timing map was way off, the haltech is gay about changing map sensors =)

mike, sorry i guess i'm steve right now
Reply
Old Oct 30, 2003 | 09:32 AM
  #62  
now's Avatar
now
Thread Starter
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 1,825
Likes: 4
From: alberta, canada
here is a couple pics of the pos Porsche intercooler
Reply
Old Oct 30, 2003 | 09:35 AM
  #63  
now's Avatar
now
Thread Starter
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 1,825
Likes: 4
From: alberta, canada
here you can see how poor the end tanks are on the
Porsche intercooler
Reply
Old Oct 30, 2003 | 12:30 PM
  #64  
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 94
Likes: 0
From: New Zealand
Originally posted by now
I am quite sure the computer was making 16 psi boost in
the car it came out of, it came from lance warren of
3rotor.com i seen a couple videos of it working in his car.
I would love to test it in a stock cosmo but there are no
cosmos around my area

matt
I'd be happy to test the ecu in my Cosmo, if you don't mind sending it to New Zealand. With my electronics background, I may even be able to duplicate what RE-Amemiya has done to it by looking at it alongside my stock ecu.

Gary
Reply
Old Oct 30, 2003 | 02:55 PM
  #65  
MtnRacer's Avatar
infini guru
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,183
Likes: 0
From: Sunnyvale, CA
Originally posted by MtnRacer
the timing map was way off, the haltech is gay about changing map sensors =)

mike, sorry i guess i'm steve right now
Idiot.

Steve
Reply
Old Oct 30, 2003 | 02:56 PM
  #66  
RotorMotor's Avatar
DRIVE THE ROTARY SPORTS
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 4,150
Likes: 0
From: CA (Bay Area)
rotaspec: there must be a good deal of modifications done to the ecu.... they would have had to add maps for the higher boost levels... im sure it would be quite an intricate project. on that note, i and im sure other people would buy one if you are able to duplicate what RE Amemiya did. i wonder if anyone or any companies in new zeland or australia have done a mod like this to the stock ecu. *think about it guys... this would be a perfect solution (assuming the turbos were modded to support 16psi)*... all you would need to do a conversion would be the modded ecu, modded turbos, engine w/ electronics/wiring harness, flywheel, large intercooler, and some way to mount it (pettit sells the FD subframe). am i forgetting anything.... this would be almost bordering on bolt on 20b (or as close to bolt on as one could get). most of the guess work/fab work would be eliminated, and if you could actually push 16psi, you would have one serious rx7. we know the turbos can be modded for that psi (although im still researching the best way to do it).... really the last piece of the puzzle is the ECU. i emailed RE Amemiya but they never got back to me........ so the question is..... is there anyone out there that has the resources to tackle this? if so count me in. heath
Reply
Old Oct 30, 2003 | 06:33 PM
  #67  
now's Avatar
now
Thread Starter
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 1,825
Likes: 4
From: alberta, canada
Originally posted by rotaspec
I'd be happy to test the ecu in my Cosmo, if you don't mind sending it to New Zealand. With my electronics background, I may even be able to duplicate what RE-Amemiya has done to it by looking at it alongside my stock ecu.

Gary
to bad i didn't know about you before it was sent back
here from kiwi-re.
and its not a simple mod there is way more to it than
just reading a chip, they even made a point of grinding
off one of the chips id numbers.

matt
Reply
Old Oct 30, 2003 | 07:02 PM
  #68  
j9fd3s's Avatar
Moderator
Community Builder
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 31,835
Likes: 3,232
From: https://www2.mazda.com/en/100th/
Originally posted by now
here you can see how poor the end tanks are on the
Porsche intercooler
its nice and thick, but its kinda small, no?

mike
Reply
Old Oct 30, 2003 | 07:51 PM
  #69  
now's Avatar
now
Thread Starter
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 1,825
Likes: 4
From: alberta, canada
Originally posted by j9fd3s
its nice and thick, but its kinda small, no?

mike
it sure cools I don't know the exact numbers
but i know that after some hard boosting i cant touch the turbo
side and the other side is just warm.

matt
Reply
Old Oct 31, 2003 | 11:54 AM
  #70  
j9fd3s's Avatar
Moderator
Community Builder
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 31,835
Likes: 3,232
From: https://www2.mazda.com/en/100th/
Originally posted by now
it sure cools I don't know the exact numbers
but i know that after some hard boosting i cant touch the turbo
side and the other side is just warm.

matt
cool, but i still wonder about the flow

mike
Reply
Old Nov 3, 2003 | 11:06 PM
  #71  
now's Avatar
now
Thread Starter
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 1,825
Likes: 4
From: alberta, canada
well did a little more playing around with the car tonight
all i can say is its cooooooooold out side
-16C to be exact, a little to cold to be testing but that
didn't stop me,,, i bypassed the ic and put in a straight pipe,
got much better response, and only a 1 lb loss
between the turbo side and the intake, guess the throttle
body might need a little work in the future.

so it was hitting 10lbs of boost on the intake side at
low rpm and once it got up to higher revs it dropped
to 8 psi to 7500 rpm pulls much harder.
next will be to try it with the waste gate clamped
and see if i can hit fuel cut with the stock computer
i was told that it should cut at 10 psi hasn't happened
yet, and the air fuel ratio stays rich all the way up.

was starting to notice a miss at 7000 rpm not sure
what's up with that.. bad plugs maybe. all went well
until the bypass pipe i was using got a nice cut, guess
it was a little to close to the p/s belt

later
matt
Reply
Old Nov 4, 2003 | 01:03 AM
  #72  
RotorMotor's Avatar
DRIVE THE ROTARY SPORTS
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 4,150
Likes: 0
From: CA (Bay Area)
im tellin ya, if you want more boost the stockers have to be modified

that being said, let me thank you again for all the testing you are doing, and to help untangle a few of the mysteries that we are all struggling with on the 20b's! you are a great resource to the 20b forum... keep up the good work! heath

Last edited by RotorMotor; Nov 4, 2003 at 01:07 AM.
Reply
Old Nov 4, 2003 | 01:38 AM
  #73  
t-von's Avatar
Rotor Head Extreme
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 6,719
Likes: 26
From: Midland Texas
Originally posted by now
well did a little more playing around with the car tonight
all i can say is its cooooooooold out side
-16C to be exact, a little to cold to be testing but that
didn't stop me,,, i bypassed the ic and put in a straight pipe,
got much better response, and only a 1 lb loss
between the turbo side and the intake, guess the throttle
body might need a little work in the future.

so it was hitting 10lbs of boost on the intake side at
low rpm and once it got up to higher revs it dropped
to 8 psi to 7500 rpm pulls much harder.
next will be to try it with the waste gate clamped
and see if i can hit fuel cut with the stock computer
i was told that it should cut at 10 psi hasn't happened
yet, and the air fuel ratio stays rich all the way up.

was starting to notice a miss at 7000 rpm not sure
what's up with that.. bad plugs maybe. all went well
until the bypass pipe i was using got a nice cut, guess
it was a little to close to the p/s belt

later
matt

Did you notice a huge differance in intake temps after bypassing the intercooler?
Reply
Old Nov 4, 2003 | 10:14 AM
  #74  
now's Avatar
now
Thread Starter
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 1,825
Likes: 4
From: alberta, canada
Originally posted by t-von
Did you notice a huge differance in intake temps after bypassing the intercooler?
lol it was -16C out side both the turbo side and intake
side were quite cold not to mention the nut holding
the steering wheel

matt
Reply
Old Nov 12, 2003 | 10:05 PM
  #75  
rxman720b's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 364
Likes: 0
From: New Braunfels, TX
Originally posted by RotorMotor
im tellin ya, if you want more boost the stockers have to be modified

that being said, let me thank you again for all the testing you are doing, and to help untangle a few of the mysteries that we are all struggling with on the 20b's! you are a great resource to the 20b forum... keep up the good work! heath
I ran the stock twins on my 20B in parallel. I was not using the stock ECU, but a MIcroTech LTX-12, without a boost controller I hit 21psi of boost out of the stock "unmodified" factory twins. It was crazy with that kind of boost! the car would break the tires loose in 4th gear! Don't know if that helps or not. I just thought it was curious that people would say that they can't produce more than 10 psi. Pettit runs his 20B twins in parallel and not sequentially. All I can say is that my 20B runs allot better now with the single T-66 and a mild streetport. :-)
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:09 PM.