cant get more than 10psi boost why?
Thread Starter
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 1,825
Likes: 4
From: alberta, canada
Originally posted by j9fd3s
now: hmm maybe your ic setup stops flowing, mine kinda felt like that, now that i have removed the 270degree ic pipe is a lot better.
now: hmm maybe your ic setup stops flowing, mine kinda felt like that, now that i have removed the 270degree ic pipe is a lot better.
if the ic were restricting flow that much i would have
thought that the turbo side pressure would have gone much higher with the waste gate disabled.
matt
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 31,835
Likes: 3,232
From: https://www2.mazda.com/en/100th/
Originally posted by now
if the ic were restricting flow that much i would have
thought that the turbo side pressure would have gone much higher with the waste gate disabled.
matt
if the ic were restricting flow that much i would have
thought that the turbo side pressure would have gone much higher with the waste gate disabled.
matt
mike
Originally posted by j9fd3s
now: hmm maybe your ic setup stops flowing, mine kinda felt like that, now that i have removed the 270degree ic pipe is a lot better.
rotormotor: it did 220rwhp with the 270pipe at 10psi, now with the better coils, and ic piping it feels a lot better, i'm going to say like 240-250rwhp@7psi.
we do have a stock ecu 20b running around to dyno too, so we can see where we are supposed to be
now: hmm maybe your ic setup stops flowing, mine kinda felt like that, now that i have removed the 270degree ic pipe is a lot better.
rotormotor: it did 220rwhp with the 270pipe at 10psi, now with the better coils, and ic piping it feels a lot better, i'm going to say like 240-250rwhp@7psi.
we do have a stock ecu 20b running around to dyno too, so we can see where we are supposed to be
oh, by the way does anyone have an idea of what a really rough HP estimate would be if we could actually get 15-16psi on a stock motor (assuming we deal with the lack of fuel)? thaknshey matt, that was my other question... with the modded RE Amemiya computer that your running how would you deal with delivering the extra fuel to support 16psi? wouldnt you have to increase injector size? and how would the coputer be able to deal with that?
Last edited by RotorMotor; Oct 28, 2003 at 03:12 PM.
Originally posted by now
if the ic were restricting flow that much i would have
thought that the turbo side pressure would have gone much higher with the waste gate disabled.
matt
if the ic were restricting flow that much i would have
thought that the turbo side pressure would have gone much higher with the waste gate disabled.
matt
Hey I did a test of the my smic & piping today to see how efficient they are. You might want to check it and hook up your boost gauges the way I did. This should really let you know how efficent your piping & intercooler really is.
https://www.rx7club.com/showthread.p...hreadid=236643
Thread Starter
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 1,825
Likes: 4
From: alberta, canada
Originally posted by RotorMotor
hey matt, that was my other question... with the modded RE Amemiya computer that your running how would you deal with delivering the extra fuel to support 16psi? wouldnt you have to increase injector size? and how would the coputer be able to deal with that?
hey matt, that was my other question... with the modded RE Amemiya computer that your running how would you deal with delivering the extra fuel to support 16psi? wouldnt you have to increase injector size? and how would the coputer be able to deal with that?
that the stock injectors will allow, nothing else needs to
be done with a stock cosmo other than open 3" exhaust
and intake.
matt
Thread Starter
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 1,825
Likes: 4
From: alberta, canada
Originally posted by t-von
Hey I did a test of the my smic & piping today to see how efficient they are. You might want to check it and hook up your boost gauges the way I did. This should really let you know how efficent your piping & intercooler really is.
https://www.rx7club.com/showthread.p...hreadid=236643
Hey I did a test of the my smic & piping today to see how efficient they are. You might want to check it and hook up your boost gauges the way I did. This should really let you know how efficent your piping & intercooler really is.
https://www.rx7club.com/showthread.p...hreadid=236643
any holes
you said that the stock ic and piping sucks,,, a
3 psi loss in the ic and pipes is what i would call really
good, you would be hard pressed to find better.
The worst that i seen with my setup on the 20b was a
total loss of 7 psi at 7500 rpm!
matt
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 31,835
Likes: 3,232
From: https://www2.mazda.com/en/100th/
Originally posted by RotorMotor
i hope you meant 320-350HP...not 220-250HP ? the stock FD's are 255HP...... even if you meant 300's it is still not much better than a modded FD... haha we need more boost people...otherwise the 20b is not worth it!!!
oh, by the way does anyone have an idea of what a really rough HP estimate would be if we could actually get 15-16psi on a stock motor (assuming we deal with the lack of fuel)? thakns
hey matt, that was my other question... with the modded RE Amemiya computer that your running how would you deal with delivering the extra fuel to support 16psi? wouldnt you have to increase injector size? and how would the coputer be able to deal with that?
i hope you meant 320-350HP...not 220-250HP ? the stock FD's are 255HP...... even if you meant 300's it is still not much better than a modded FD... haha we need more boost people...otherwise the 20b is not worth it!!!
oh, by the way does anyone have an idea of what a really rough HP estimate would be if we could actually get 15-16psi on a stock motor (assuming we deal with the lack of fuel)? thaknshey matt, that was my other question... with the modded RE Amemiya computer that your running how would you deal with delivering the extra fuel to support 16psi? wouldnt you have to increase injector size? and how would the coputer be able to deal with that?
mike
Originally posted by now
The worst that i seen with my setup on the 20b was a
total loss of 7 psi at 7500 rpm!
matt
The worst that i seen with my setup on the 20b was a
total loss of 7 psi at 7500 rpm!
matt
Damn 7psi loss
Do you have any pics of your setup?Hey Mike, That dyno run of the 139 rwhp at 12psi on a 20b. Did you have really low compression or something at the time?
Thread Starter
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 1,825
Likes: 4
From: alberta, canada
I am using a Porsche intercooler and i think the big loss
problem might be there, the end tanks really suck on it
i think i am going to cut them off and put 4 inch pipes
on it and see what it does
matt
problem might be there, the end tanks really suck on it
i think i am going to cut them off and put 4 inch pipes
on it and see what it does

matt
would that really help that much? i have a feeling its mostly piping and the internal structure of the intercooler. let me know how it turns out though. how big is the IC? got any pictures?
Originally posted by t-von
Damn 7psi loss
Do you have any pics of your setup?
Hey Mike, That dyno run of the 139 rwhp at 12psi on a 20b. Did you have really low compression or something at the time?
Damn 7psi loss
Do you have any pics of your setup?Hey Mike, That dyno run of the 139 rwhp at 12psi on a 20b. Did you have really low compression or something at the time?
mike, sorry i guess i'm steve right now
Full Member
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 94
Likes: 0
From: New Zealand
Originally posted by now
I am quite sure the computer was making 16 psi boost in
the car it came out of, it came from lance warren of
3rotor.com i seen a couple videos of it working in his car.
I would love to test it in a stock cosmo but there are no
cosmos around my area
matt
I am quite sure the computer was making 16 psi boost in
the car it came out of, it came from lance warren of
3rotor.com i seen a couple videos of it working in his car.
I would love to test it in a stock cosmo but there are no
cosmos around my area
matt
Gary
rotaspec: there must be a good deal of modifications done to the ecu.... they would have had to add maps for the higher boost levels... im sure it would be quite an intricate project. on that note, i and im sure other people would buy one if you are able to duplicate what RE Amemiya did. i wonder if anyone or any companies in new zeland or australia have done a mod like this to the stock ecu. *think about it guys... this would be a perfect solution (assuming the turbos were modded to support 16psi)*... all you would need to do a conversion would be the modded ecu, modded turbos, engine w/ electronics/wiring harness, flywheel, large intercooler, and some way to mount it (pettit sells the FD subframe). am i forgetting anything.... this would be almost bordering on bolt on 20b (or as close to bolt on as one could get). most of the guess work/fab work would be eliminated, and if you could actually push 16psi, you would have one serious rx7. we know the turbos can be modded for that psi (although im still researching the best way to do it).... really the last piece of the puzzle is the ECU. i emailed RE Amemiya but they never got back to me........ so the question is..... is there anyone out there that has the resources to tackle this? if so count me in. heath
Thread Starter
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 1,825
Likes: 4
From: alberta, canada
Originally posted by rotaspec
I'd be happy to test the ecu in my Cosmo, if you don't mind sending it to New Zealand. With my electronics background, I may even be able to duplicate what RE-Amemiya has done to it by looking at it alongside my stock ecu.
Gary
I'd be happy to test the ecu in my Cosmo, if you don't mind sending it to New Zealand. With my electronics background, I may even be able to duplicate what RE-Amemiya has done to it by looking at it alongside my stock ecu.
Gary
here from kiwi-re.
and its not a simple mod there is way more to it than
just reading a chip, they even made a point of grinding
off one of the chips id numbers.
matt
Thread Starter
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 1,825
Likes: 4
From: alberta, canada
Originally posted by j9fd3s
its nice and thick, but its kinda small, no?
mike
its nice and thick, but its kinda small, no?
mike
but i know that after some hard boosting i cant touch the turbo
side and the other side is just warm.
matt
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 31,835
Likes: 3,232
From: https://www2.mazda.com/en/100th/
Originally posted by now
it sure cools I don't know the exact numbers
but i know that after some hard boosting i cant touch the turbo
side and the other side is just warm.
matt
it sure cools I don't know the exact numbers
but i know that after some hard boosting i cant touch the turbo
side and the other side is just warm.
matt
mike
Thread Starter
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 1,825
Likes: 4
From: alberta, canada
well did a little more playing around with the car tonight
all i can say is its cooooooooold out side
-16C to be exact, a little to cold to be testing but that
didn't stop me,,, i bypassed the ic and put in a straight pipe,
got much better response, and only a 1 lb loss
between the turbo side and the intake, guess the throttle
body might need a little work in the future.
so it was hitting 10lbs of boost on the intake side at
low rpm and once it got up to higher revs it dropped
to 8 psi to 7500 rpm pulls much harder.
next will be to try it with the waste gate clamped
and see if i can hit fuel cut with the stock computer
i was told that it should cut at 10 psi hasn't happened
yet, and the air fuel ratio stays rich all the way up.
was starting to notice a miss at 7000 rpm not sure
what's up with that.. bad plugs maybe. all went well
until the bypass pipe i was using got a nice cut, guess
it was a little to close to the p/s belt
later
matt
all i can say is its cooooooooold out side

-16C to be exact, a little to cold to be testing but that
didn't stop me,,, i bypassed the ic and put in a straight pipe,
got much better response, and only a 1 lb loss
between the turbo side and the intake, guess the throttle
body might need a little work in the future.
so it was hitting 10lbs of boost on the intake side at
low rpm and once it got up to higher revs it dropped
to 8 psi to 7500 rpm pulls much harder.
next will be to try it with the waste gate clamped
and see if i can hit fuel cut with the stock computer
i was told that it should cut at 10 psi hasn't happened
yet, and the air fuel ratio stays rich all the way up.
was starting to notice a miss at 7000 rpm not sure
what's up with that.. bad plugs maybe. all went well
until the bypass pipe i was using got a nice cut, guess
it was a little to close to the p/s belt

later
matt
im tellin ya, if you want more boost the stockers have to be modified 
that being said, let me thank you again for all the testing you are doing, and to help untangle a few of the mysteries that we are all struggling with on the 20b's! you are a great resource to the 20b forum... keep up the good work! heath

that being said, let me thank you again for all the testing you are doing, and to help untangle a few of the mysteries that we are all struggling with on the 20b's! you are a great resource to the 20b forum... keep up the good work! heath
Last edited by RotorMotor; Nov 4, 2003 at 01:07 AM.
Originally posted by now
well did a little more playing around with the car tonight
all i can say is its cooooooooold out side
-16C to be exact, a little to cold to be testing but that
didn't stop me,,, i bypassed the ic and put in a straight pipe,
got much better response, and only a 1 lb loss
between the turbo side and the intake, guess the throttle
body might need a little work in the future.
so it was hitting 10lbs of boost on the intake side at
low rpm and once it got up to higher revs it dropped
to 8 psi to 7500 rpm pulls much harder.
next will be to try it with the waste gate clamped
and see if i can hit fuel cut with the stock computer
i was told that it should cut at 10 psi hasn't happened
yet, and the air fuel ratio stays rich all the way up.
was starting to notice a miss at 7000 rpm not sure
what's up with that.. bad plugs maybe. all went well
until the bypass pipe i was using got a nice cut, guess
it was a little to close to the p/s belt
later
matt
well did a little more playing around with the car tonight
all i can say is its cooooooooold out side

-16C to be exact, a little to cold to be testing but that
didn't stop me,,, i bypassed the ic and put in a straight pipe,
got much better response, and only a 1 lb loss
between the turbo side and the intake, guess the throttle
body might need a little work in the future.
so it was hitting 10lbs of boost on the intake side at
low rpm and once it got up to higher revs it dropped
to 8 psi to 7500 rpm pulls much harder.
next will be to try it with the waste gate clamped
and see if i can hit fuel cut with the stock computer
i was told that it should cut at 10 psi hasn't happened
yet, and the air fuel ratio stays rich all the way up.
was starting to notice a miss at 7000 rpm not sure
what's up with that.. bad plugs maybe. all went well
until the bypass pipe i was using got a nice cut, guess
it was a little to close to the p/s belt

later
matt
Did you notice a huge differance in intake temps after bypassing the intercooler?
Thread Starter
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 1,825
Likes: 4
From: alberta, canada
Originally posted by t-von
Did you notice a huge differance in intake temps after bypassing the intercooler?
Did you notice a huge differance in intake temps after bypassing the intercooler?
side were quite cold not to mention the nut holding
the steering wheel

matt
Originally posted by RotorMotor
im tellin ya, if you want more boost the stockers have to be modified
that being said, let me thank you again for all the testing you are doing, and to help untangle a few of the mysteries that we are all struggling with on the 20b's! you are a great resource to the 20b forum... keep up the good work! heath
im tellin ya, if you want more boost the stockers have to be modified

that being said, let me thank you again for all the testing you are doing, and to help untangle a few of the mysteries that we are all struggling with on the 20b's! you are a great resource to the 20b forum... keep up the good work! heath







