1st Generation Specific (1979-1985) 1979-1985 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections

for your veiwing pleasure

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 22, 2005 | 11:02 AM
  #1  
13B4port's Avatar
Thread Starter
Will Work for Beer
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 455
Likes: 0
From: Lincoln, Ne
for your veiwing pleasure

i had a huge argument about this. no one beleives me that the corvette had a wankle. read below

http://www.monito.com/wankel/corvette.html
Reply
Old Apr 22, 2005 | 11:09 AM
  #2  
Elysian's Avatar
Bimmer *****
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 2,199
Likes: 1
From: Plano, TX
i dunno why u'd have to convince anyone on a rx7 site about this? i thought this was common knowledge among us wankelers
Reply
Old Apr 22, 2005 | 11:13 AM
  #3  
13B4port's Avatar
Thread Starter
Will Work for Beer
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 455
Likes: 0
From: Lincoln, Ne
i'm stuborn. i had a big debate about 9 months or so ago about this. i believe it started on this board but i can't remember.
Reply
Old Apr 22, 2005 | 12:22 PM
  #4  
FBrotor7's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 164
Likes: 0
From: Mississippi
I had never heard of this, thanks for the info. A friend of mine is obsessed with Corvettes but hates rotaries so I can't wait to tell him.
Reply
Old Apr 22, 2005 | 03:19 PM
  #5  
Yark79's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 287
Likes: 0
From: Knoxville, Tennessee
Mercedes did something like that too. I think it was called the C111. It was pretty cool, had gullwing doors. For some reason I think it may have been a 3 or 4 rotor.
Reply
Old Apr 22, 2005 | 04:25 PM
  #6  
wpg7's Avatar
Junior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
From: winnipeg
The Mercedes was called the C111 . It was a prototype that was made in a 3 and 4 rotor configuration. here is a link to some more info http://www.monito.com/wankel/mercedes.html
Reply
Old Apr 22, 2005 | 04:29 PM
  #7  
rotor vs. piston's Avatar
Function > Form
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 10,890
Likes: 3
From: Catonsville MD (baltimore suburb)
Originally Posted by Elysian
i dunno why u'd have to convince anyone on a rx7 site about this? i thought this was common knowledge among us wankelers
We just know our history better than the youngens is all.
Reply
Old Apr 22, 2005 | 04:50 PM
  #8  
Dan_s_young's Avatar
Turbo widebody FB
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 3,733
Likes: 3
From: Alberta Canada
yup its true, basically they shunned it though because of the bad mileage if i remember correctly
Reply
Old Apr 22, 2005 | 04:56 PM
  #9  
lovintha7's Avatar
Suicidal Death Missile
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,782
Likes: 0
From: Newport News, Virginia
If anyone ever read the RX Tuner article, they would know this. I think it's the first part of the Rotary History article.
Reply
Old Apr 22, 2005 | 05:58 PM
  #10  
cdrad51's Avatar
Lorem ipsum dolor sit ame
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 3,262
Likes: 1
From: The Net
Originally Posted by Dan_s_young
yup its true, basically they shunned it though because of the bad mileage if i remember correctly
bad mileage? that's impossible!
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Icearia
Introduce yourself
13
Feb 21, 2016 09:18 AM
Fumi
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
7
Oct 28, 2004 08:31 PM
1SxyRXy
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
6
May 7, 2004 02:41 PM
rx7_88turbo2
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
7
Jun 9, 2002 07:43 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:29 PM.