1st Generation Specific (1979-1985) 1979-1985 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections

Why not?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 19, 2004 | 03:08 PM
  #1  
Rotofire's Avatar
Thread Starter
Yea, I'm working on it...
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,220
Likes: 0
From: Click click fucking click, Africa
Why not?

I've searched, and I realize not many people (if any) have a carb'd, 13bT. Why not? Wouldn't it be easier to do a 13bT carb'd instead of messing with the ECU's and wiring.


Mike

by the way, anyone have a 13b short block they wanna sell?

edit: oh by the way, does anyone have the website that sells the flush headlight kits? Thanks!

Last edited by Rotofire; Nov 19, 2004 at 03:11 PM.
Reply
Old Nov 19, 2004 | 03:25 PM
  #2  
Alex-7's Avatar
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 2,117
Likes: 2
From: Waukesha Wisconsin
http://www.cpracing.ca for the flush mount headlights.


I'm no authority on turbo setups but if I was doing a Bt I'd think the carb would be the easyer rout to take.........
Reply
Old Nov 19, 2004 | 04:20 PM
  #3  
steve84GS TII's Avatar
FB+FC=F-ME
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 3,353
Likes: 5
From: Rohnert Park CA
Carbs may be easier to setup,not neccesarily easier to tune.
The wiring on the TII is not that complex and the metered air EFI is friendly to mods,with no reprogramming needed for mild/moderate upgrades(to about 250hp)

No matter how you cut it,EFI is better.Why do you think there was an accute lack of turbo engines in the 70's-80's?(besides the fact that big Cu.in V-8s and cheap gas reigned supreme until the oil crisis)
Once EFI became mainstream (about 84-85) there were turbo cars everywhere.(Starion,323GTX,Probe,Chryslers,RX-7,Grand National,300ZX,Supra,ect,ect,ect).EFI allowed reliable fuleing under the high stress and varying conditions that turbo engines experience. Turbo engines will crumble if the mixture goes off track.EFI is monitering everything.A carb is 100% reliant on you to setup the correct fuel delivery settings.Which isnt to say they dont work with turbos,its just trickier,with less margin for error.

Last edited by steve84GS TII; Nov 19, 2004 at 04:49 PM.
Reply
Old Nov 19, 2004 | 07:42 PM
  #4  
Rotofire's Avatar
Thread Starter
Yea, I'm working on it...
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,220
Likes: 0
From: Click click fucking click, Africa
man, that hit it pretty much on the nose. Another point is price effective, which would be easier on the wallet? To me, carb still seems to be the easier/cheaper route....
Reply
Old Nov 19, 2004 | 09:15 PM
  #5  
steve84GS TII's Avatar
FB+FC=F-ME
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 3,353
Likes: 5
From: Rohnert Park CA
So long as you can tune and prep a carb for turbo and your very carful while tuning,then yes a carb is much cheaper.No special manifolds,no injectors,no electronics,no high pressure fuel,no computors.
You just have to adress the mods a carb needs to work under positive pressure,and you have to get it tuned to a safe mixture at all speeds/loads...WITHOUT blowing up or wounding the engine while experimenting.A dyno and wideband O2 obviously help,but it will take longer to do the tuning since you have to physically change things on the carb.With EFI,you just punch a keyboard(with a standalone ECU,anyways)
Reply




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:34 PM.