1st Generation Specific (1979-1985) 1979-1985 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections

Who has a grannys speed shop 8.8 rear?

Old Jan 18, 2007 | 09:51 PM
  #1  
gonzz's Avatar
Thread Starter
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 4,236
Likes: 0
From: Las Vegas, NV
Who has a grannys speed shop 8.8 rear?

I was wondering who has granyy 8.8 rear. I'm going to order mine in 2 weeks and wanted to know if the people running them would do anything different if they had to do it again.... What gears to get also?.. I'm thinking 3:73's. Thanks for any info.
Attached Thumbnails Who has a grannys speed shop 8.8 rear?-1tasa1500w.jpg   Who has a grannys speed shop 8.8 rear?-1tasa2500w.jpg   Who has a grannys speed shop 8.8 rear?-2tasakit2500w.jpg   Who has a grannys speed shop 8.8 rear?-tasa7300w.jpg   Who has a grannys speed shop 8.8 rear?-tasa8500w.jpg  


Last edited by gonzz; Jan 18, 2007 at 10:07 PM.
Reply
Old Jan 19, 2007 | 08:45 AM
  #2  
evita's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 131
Likes: 0
From: Houston, Texas
Rearend

Where do you purchase one of those? I'm interested...I don't think I've ever seen that before.

EDIT: Answered my own question

http://www.grannysspeedshop.com/

Last edited by evita; Jan 19, 2007 at 08:52 AM.
Reply
Old Jan 19, 2007 | 09:03 AM
  #3  
evita's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 131
Likes: 0
From: Houston, Texas
Rear End

I dunno...after looking at it, you still have to use the watts set up to locate the rear end side to side. I guess if you were using a V-8, the torque figures would be much higher, thus the necessity of a killer rear end.

I would only change my SE set up by adding a tri-link and panhard bar.

I do like how you can choose your gear ratio however....

Guess it depends on what you need your car to do.
Reply
Old Jan 19, 2007 | 09:10 AM
  #4  
z-beater's Avatar
REW'd FB
Tenured Member: 20 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,685
Likes: 1
From: WA
Why not ReSpeed's new rear-end kit that is supposed to come out? The 8.8 is great, don't get me wrong but IMO it creates a lot of parasitic power loss.
Reply
Old Jan 19, 2007 | 10:57 AM
  #5  
EvilJester's Avatar
Apply clever comment here
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 125
Likes: 0
From: Post Falls ID
Originally Posted by z-beater
IMO it creates a lot of parasitic power loss.

could you expand on that a bit more...im not shure what you meen.
Reply
Old Jan 19, 2007 | 11:15 AM
  #6  
dj55b's Avatar
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 6,122
Likes: 1
From: London, Ontario
the heavier the components the more power loss through the drive terrain, hence the terms flywheel horsepower (power made at the Flywheel), Wheel horse power (the actualy number of horse power left to run the car, the lost HP is equated into moving the flywheel, transmission, drive shaft, rear and gears, rear axles, brakes's and obviously wheel) this is why they make lighter components such as Aluminium flywheels, aluminium drive shafts, and things like that to have more "usuable" HP at the wheels.
Reply
Old Jan 19, 2007 | 01:00 PM
  #7  
85rotarypower's Avatar
love the braaaap
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 3,771
Likes: 5
From: Bognor, Ontario
The Respeed kit is just axles drilled to a specified bolt pattern when you order them. They don't strengthen the rear end really. The axles themselves are stronger, but in most cases its not the axles that break. Thats one of the strongest parts of the stock axle assembly.

As for gears, I would suggest stock 4.10 or even 4.44 to compensate for the added weight of the rear end.
Reply
Old Jan 19, 2007 | 05:36 PM
  #8  
gonzz's Avatar
Thread Starter
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 4,236
Likes: 0
From: Las Vegas, NV
When you get above 400 RWHP the stock rear end will not last. Some people say it will but let's face the facts. The stock rear was made for how much HP? The 8.8 might add 50 lbs but is that a big deal for a great rear end that can handle anything you throw at it.. It's the best option in my opinion. I'm ordering it next week so I will let you guys know...
Reply
Old Jan 19, 2007 | 06:51 PM
  #9  
DriveFast7's Avatar
Blood, Sweat and Rotors
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 3,742
Likes: 1
From: California
hi steve,

is that a torque arm suspension? welding it to the axel would be lighter and stronger than bolting it to the diff cover in single shear.

in the first pic, what is the black link in front of the axel?

if instead of the big center conglomeration of tubes you did a 3rd link from ontop of the diff, thru the floor to a bracket on the crossmember it would be a lot lighter.

as for ratio, why not something in the low 4.00's.
Reply
Old Jan 19, 2007 | 07:00 PM
  #10  
twinkletoes's Avatar
Eats, Sleeps, Dreams Rotary
Tenured Member: 15 Years
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 3,740
Likes: 6
From: Las Vegas, NV
Steve will defintaley need to upgrade his rear end (thats sounds funny) with the setup he is going to be doing. It will be heavier, but will great imo. He will also have to give me a ride sometime . I think you are doing the right thing steve. Keep us posted.
Reply
Old Jan 19, 2007 | 07:04 PM
  #11  
Dan_s_young's Avatar
Turbo widebody FB
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 3,733
Likes: 3
From: Alberta Canada
The parasitic power loss from the heavier built differential should be pretty minor the extra reliability and longevity that you will recieve will make it worth it.

As far as gear ratios go you need to be careful because you can actually make the car a little slower by choosing a gear that is too low.

Also with the 8.8" you can use mustang brakes out back IIRC.

Gonzz were you able to talk to Grannies online or did you call them and talk to them? I emailed them a while back, but I have heard many stories about them not writing back, and I never got a email back.

I will be following in your footsteps soon, but I have other aspects of my project I need to work out prior.

Also I like the concept of the rear end lifting under accell/load. But wouldn't that have the tendancy to lower the amount of traction out back?
Reply
Old Jan 19, 2007 | 08:11 PM
  #12  
gonzz's Avatar
Thread Starter
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 4,236
Likes: 0
From: Las Vegas, NV
I called them. I'll let you know after i get it installed.
Reply
Old Jan 19, 2007 | 08:14 PM
  #13  
gonzz's Avatar
Thread Starter
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 4,236
Likes: 0
From: Las Vegas, NV
I was told a 3:73 is my best option when running 15" wheels. It's not a 1/4 mile car.. Just a fun street car. I think Directfreak is running the same gear ratio also
Reply
Old Jan 19, 2007 | 09:23 PM
  #14  
trochoid's Avatar
Old Fart Young at Heart
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 15,145
Likes: 8
From: St Joe MO
For a V8 swap, 3:73s might be ok, but not on a rotary with an 8k redline. With the 15X7s I'm running now, net gear ratio from the stock GSL rear is near 3:73 on mine now. To have my speedo read correctly with the 245/50/15 tires, I need 4:33 gears.
Reply
Old Jan 19, 2007 | 09:26 PM
  #15  
gonzz's Avatar
Thread Starter
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 4,236
Likes: 0
From: Las Vegas, NV
you running a TII trans? My speedo is showing different than yours then. But I'm running a S5 TII trans and 5 TII instrument cluster in my car..



Originally Posted by trochoid
For a V8 swap, 3:73s might be ok, but not on a rotary with an 8k redline. With the 15X7s I'm running now, net gear ratio from the stock GSL rear is near 3:73 on mine now. To have my speedo read correctly with the 245/50/15 tires, I need 4:33 gears.
Reply
Old Jan 19, 2007 | 09:31 PM
  #16  
Dan_s_young's Avatar
Turbo widebody FB
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 3,733
Likes: 3
From: Alberta Canada
Originally Posted by trochoid
For a V8 swap, 3:73s might be ok, but not on a rotary with an 8k redline. With the 15X7s I'm running now, net gear ratio from the stock GSL rear is near 3:73 on mine now. To have my speedo read correctly with the 245/50/15 tires, I need 4:33 gears.
For interest sake how did you calculate this out? Did you use a calculator of some sort on the internet to figure out the actual number?

I know since I am running 17" (315/35/17 rear tires) rims my gear ratio is going to be different, but I dunno if my gear ratio decision is going to be in order to correct the speedometer... But instead for the best overall performance.
Reply
Old Jan 19, 2007 | 09:55 PM
  #17  
trochoid's Avatar
Old Fart Young at Heart
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 15,145
Likes: 8
From: St Joe MO
Took a stock tire and wheel, along with the 15" one, marked a spot on each, rolled them on the floor and measured the distance traveled. I was also stopped speeding. Had the speedo sitting at 78/79, clocked at 87. Don't remember the measurements off hand, but the difference was around 9-11%. Didn't get into the heavy math, I estimated in my head and could be a bit off.

Nice thing about Ford gearsets, they're cheap. Track testing with different sets will show the optimum ratio.
Reply
Old Jan 19, 2007 | 10:00 PM
  #18  
Dan_s_young's Avatar
Turbo widebody FB
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 3,733
Likes: 3
From: Alberta Canada
My biggest complaint about the 8.8" is that it's overhung and it's not a removable carrier... These are the two reasons I wanted a 9", but I don't know if the extra weight is justifiable. But either way the cheap gear sets is a HUGE plus.

Last edited by Dan_s_young; Jan 19, 2007 at 10:18 PM.
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2007 | 07:14 PM
  #19  
katorx7's Avatar
World 427ci 7.0 liters
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 104
Likes: 0
From: Las Vegas
Hey Steve there are several schools at my control tower that can help you get your pilots license for that airplane you drive on the street.

Here are some pics of my Grannys 8.8 set up. Order the adjustable heim end suspension setup it will help make the install cleaner and easier. Also the suspension will work better.

I should have this in the car next weekend.



Granny's Speed Shop
Truck housing 8.8 Ford diff (more material, larger, approx 10+ lbs heavier)
3.73 gears, Detroit Locker, Alloy racing axles, longer wheel studs

Custom adjustable heim end watts link, custom adjustable heim end lower control arms

M/T ET Drag wheels (11 lbs)




Name:  DSC00190.jpg
Views: 1281
Size:  113.5 KB

Name:  DSC00191.jpg
Views: 1294
Size:  114.8 KB


Name:  DSC00192.jpg
Views: 1171
Size:  93.1 KB

Name:  DSC00193.jpg
Views: 1342
Size:  100.7 KB

Name:  DSC00194.jpg
Views: 1459
Size:  99.8 KB[/QUOTE]
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2007 | 07:40 PM
  #20  
gonzz's Avatar
Thread Starter
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 4,236
Likes: 0
From: Las Vegas, NV
FYI.. his 8.8 setup is for a FC...Looks sweet..

Last edited by gonzz; Jan 20, 2007 at 07:48 PM.
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2007 | 08:04 PM
  #21  
Dan_s_young's Avatar
Turbo widebody FB
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 3,733
Likes: 3
From: Alberta Canada
That looks awesome, I can't wait until I can get mine! I'm sure shipping will be rediculous though...
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2007 | 08:09 PM
  #22  
gonzz's Avatar
Thread Starter
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 4,236
Likes: 0
From: Las Vegas, NV
They quoted me 350.00 shipping for mine to Las Vegas
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2007 | 08:12 PM
  #23  
katorx7's Avatar
World 427ci 7.0 liters
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 104
Likes: 0
From: Las Vegas
Wasn't too bad. Total for shipping was $200.00. (1) crate-truck freight, (3) large boxes USPS.

My order took about 2 1/2 months because of the truck housing, detroit locker and the heim end suspension parts. Well worth the wait.
Reply
Old Jan 21, 2007 | 10:26 AM
  #24  
Directfreak's Avatar
I am a Jeeper Now.
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 9,371
Likes: 4
From: 3OH5
That kit looks great!!
Originally Posted by gonzz
The 8.8 might add 50 lbs but is that a big deal for a great rear end that can handle anything you throw at it..
More like 100 lbs.. *sigh*
Originally Posted by gonzz
It's the best option in my opinion.
I would've gone that option if it was available at the time.
Originally Posted by gonzz
I was told a 3:73 is my best option when running 15" wheels. It's not a 1/4 mile car.. Just a fun street car. I think Directfreak is running the same gear ratio also
Yes, and you will love it. The turbo will actually be able to use the gears, instead of just spinning the tires. My 3rd gear goes to 110mph at 7000 RPM.
Originally Posted by trochoid
For a V8 swap, 3:73s might be ok, but not on a rotary with an 8k redline. With the 15X7s I'm running now, net gear ratio from the stock GSL rear is near 3:73 on mine now. To have my speedo read correctly with the 245/50/15 tires, I need 4:33 gears.
GSL Rear is 3.90(09) On a Turbo car, a heavier rear end, and lower gearing will actually increase load, this spooling the turbo much faster. It will also be better to move forward, rather than spinning the wheels. I suprise people very much, as my car scoots and goes, and rarely loses traction when accelerating. (unless I want it too ). For a street car, -it's a great option.
For a drag car, the 4.44's would be fast (with slicks) but just plain suck on the road.

http://www.f-body.org/gears/

Originally Posted by Dan_s_young
My biggest complaint about the 8.8" is that it's overhung and it's not a removable carrier... These are the two reasons I wanted a 9"
That's why I went with an 8.8, with 9" ends, thus no "C" clips,and big bearing ends. All the goodies, with less weight.
Reply
Old Jan 21, 2007 | 11:06 AM
  #25  
z-beater's Avatar
REW'd FB
Tenured Member: 20 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,685
Likes: 1
From: WA
Originally Posted by 85rotarypower
The Respeed kit is just axles drilled to a specified bolt pattern when you order them. They don't strengthen the rear end really. The axles themselves are stronger, but in most cases its not the axles that break. Thats one of the strongest parts of the stock axle assembly.

As for gears, I would suggest stock 4.10 or even 4.44 to compensate for the added weight of the rear end.
I would disagree. I would say that the weak link is the axles. Also the axles that are provided are a heavier duty moser units. A local friend has blown a few different rear-ends. If you ask him what broke, he will tell you exactly what I stated above. If you fear that the axles are the weakest link you could always cryo-treat the gears. (I am by no means saying that the gears cannot break, just that is not the weakest point.)

I will be running these. I will report when I di so...

Why add weight?
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Th0m4s
Build Threads
25
Feb 26, 2019 02:04 AM
C. Ludwig
Single Turbo RX-7's
49
Jan 30, 2019 06:31 AM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:19 AM.