1st Generation Specific (1979-1985) 1979-1985 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections

Which wheels do you like better on my FB?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 1, 2003 | 05:06 PM
  #1  
Cody's Avatar
Thread Starter
SKELETOR!
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,077
Likes: 0
From: Prescott Valley, AZ
Question Which wheels do you like better on my FB?

Ok people...

The white wheels are Motegi MR7's - 17", with 205/40/17 Yokohama Parada Spec II tires.



The wheels in my sig are MotoFORM 15" with some ghetto brand tires on them.

Opinions?

Oh, and if they look odd, its because they're not actually attached to my car....just in front of the 15" wheels. I played with lighting and the camera settings to make them look like they're on the car.
Reply
Old Sep 1, 2003 | 07:58 PM
  #2  
clarksonrx7's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 133
Likes: 0
From: New York
do u have to roll the fender lips to get those 17's on ur car?
Reply
Old Sep 1, 2003 | 07:59 PM
  #3  
ioTus's Avatar
'84 5-letter
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 3,219
Likes: 8
From: Washington State
uh, is there any question???/

the 17's...... for sure...
Reply
Old Sep 1, 2003 | 08:18 PM
  #4  
82transam's Avatar
Never Follow
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 8,389
Likes: 120
From: North Jersey
I'm not a fan of 17's on a FB, but they do look much better than your current ones. Go for it.
Reply
Old Sep 1, 2003 | 09:14 PM
  #5  
timmya2's Avatar
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 1,068
Likes: 0
From: Pensacola
cody.. shwo us sum better pics of yur car..

all we have is that sig.. thats blurry.. we need more angles of it..
Reply
Old Sep 1, 2003 | 11:35 PM
  #6  
RotorMotorDriver's Avatar
Seven Is Coming
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 6,503
Likes: 4
From: Washington
17s

~T.J.
Reply
Old Sep 1, 2003 | 11:39 PM
  #7  
O 16581 72452 5's Avatar
The infamous number guy!
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,953
Likes: 0
From: Terre Haute, IN.
15s look so much better.
Reply
Old Sep 1, 2003 | 11:54 PM
  #8  
ioTus's Avatar
'84 5-letter
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 3,219
Likes: 8
From: Washington State
hah 15's.... your a crack head
Reply
Old Sep 1, 2003 | 11:57 PM
  #9  
O 16581 72452 5's Avatar
The infamous number guy!
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,953
Likes: 0
From: Terre Haute, IN.
17's look terrible to me. Maybe if they were 5 finger or had a "dish" to them.
Reply
Old Sep 2, 2003 | 12:01 AM
  #10  
[FLaT]'s Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 106
Likes: 0
From: Los Angeles
17's for sure.
Reply
Old Sep 2, 2003 | 02:39 AM
  #11  
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 96
Likes: 0
From: your moms house
Put on the 17's, and give me your 15's, LOL. :P
Reply
Old Sep 2, 2003 | 02:52 AM
  #12  
Cody's Avatar
Thread Starter
SKELETOR!
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,077
Likes: 0
From: Prescott Valley, AZ
17's look terrible to me. Maybe if they were 5 finger or had a "dish" to them.
Didn't you have 17" wheels on your Blitz bumper GSL-SE?
Reply
Old Sep 2, 2003 | 02:57 AM
  #13  
O 16581 72452 5's Avatar
The infamous number guy!
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,953
Likes: 0
From: Terre Haute, IN.
They were 16's. I really wish i would have left the exterior of that car alone anyway, it was too perfect to ruin like i did. I didn't even know what a GSL-SE was though until i joined this forum and had already ruined the car.

My wheels had a "dish" anyway.

Last edited by O 16581 72452 5; Sep 2, 2003 at 03:01 AM.
Reply
Old Sep 2, 2003 | 02:58 AM
  #14  
O 16581 72452 5's Avatar
The infamous number guy!
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,953
Likes: 0
From: Terre Haute, IN.



Last edited by O 16581 72452 5; Sep 2, 2003 at 03:01 AM.
Reply
Old Sep 2, 2003 | 07:14 AM
  #15  
EL PAALO's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 494
Likes: 0
From: San Marcos TEXAS
Don't listen to the crackheads.
The 15's look good.
The 17's are wrong.
Reply
Old Sep 2, 2003 | 12:11 PM
  #16  
13B4port's Avatar
Will Work for Beer
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 455
Likes: 0
From: Lincoln, Ne
the 17's look horrible. it' looks lke those SUV's with the huge rims and really low profiles. so low that if they smakced a curb the rim is ruined. i think that 16's are the biggest rimt o go on our 7's
Reply
Old Sep 2, 2003 | 12:23 PM
  #17  
K-Tune's Avatar
FD Daily
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (27)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 3,308
Likes: 14
From: Gulf Breeze, FL
larger diameter wheels move the etcintric weight of the wheel towards the outside..making it hard to turn, thereby reducing your horsepower at the wheels. from a performance standpoint...larger wheels are almost never better. go with the 15" for sure..both looks and performance wise for the FB.
Reply
Old Sep 2, 2003 | 12:52 PM
  #18  
Mschafe's Avatar
Where did my 7 go?
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 357
Likes: 0
From: Burnsville, MN
i like the 17's MUCH better...
Reply
Old Sep 2, 2003 | 01:34 PM
  #19  
Cody's Avatar
Thread Starter
SKELETOR!
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,077
Likes: 0
From: Prescott Valley, AZ
thats cause you want my 15's Matt!
Reply
Old Sep 2, 2003 | 01:56 PM
  #20  
peejay's Avatar
Old [Sch|F]ool
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 12,865
Likes: 572
From: Cleveland, Ohio, USA
Be careful when you solicit opinions.

Solicited opinion: They both suck, it's a 70's car so it needs 70's wheels - get some 13x7 steel wheels for it!
Reply
Old Sep 2, 2003 | 02:25 PM
  #21  
Metallic_rock's Avatar
Ride 'n Style
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,929
Likes: 0
From: Spokane, WA
Ok, I think they both look ok... here's the problem... from a performance standpoint. - when going around corners, your tires need to flex to keep from sliding. if they don't flex, which they won't with that little bit of tire, you will easily slide, while with the 15's, you won't.

If you are just going for the ricer- "hey, you can see my coil springs through my rims" look, then yeah, go for it, but I wouldn't just because of what I said before.

Also, one other thing to look at... as I mentioned, you'll be able to see your coil springs VERY easily. You'll need to clean them up to make it look "ok" and even then it would look funny with the tiny (in comparison) brake rotors.
Reply
Old Sep 2, 2003 | 03:49 PM
  #22  
CheddaKing's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 252
Likes: 0
From: Easton, PA
Reply
Old Sep 2, 2003 | 04:35 PM
  #23  
racintang's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 367
Likes: 0
From: Virginia
Whats the widest you can go on a stock application?

1980
Reply
Old Sep 2, 2003 | 05:03 PM
  #24  
mcinnes's Avatar
NO ROTOR NO MOTOR
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 341
Likes: 0
From: camrose alberta canada
17's
Reply
Old Sep 2, 2003 | 05:05 PM
  #25  
O 16581 72452 5's Avatar
The infamous number guy!
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,953
Likes: 0
From: Terre Haute, IN.
Originally posted by racintang
Whats the widest you can go on a stock application?

1980
I'd say 225 depending on offset, i had 215s with a 40 offset, no scrubbing issues and still plenty of clearance under the fender of the front, springs were getting close though. The rears could probably have gone even larger than 225.
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:17 AM.