Top gear rx7 vs 924 (VIDEO)
01-21-04, 05:39 AM
#1
Rotary Powered Boobies
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Miami Beach
Posts: 2,530
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Top gear rx7 vs 924 (VIDEO)
http://www.sleepy-fish.com/fish/Top_...s_924_1985.avi
I have'nt seen it yet (Damn Dial up
) is it any good?
I have'nt seen it yet (Damn Dial up
) is it any good?
01-21-04, 06:09 AM
#2
i say what i want
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: richmond, va
Posts: 1,866
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
thats really weird, i just watched that yesterday, and was thinking about posting it, but didnt because it was a fc. its a pretty good video, even though its no the normal top gear
01-21-04, 08:28 AM
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Gig Harbor, WA
Posts: 566
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by Dom
I'm downloading it right now but the video's server must also be on dial up! (10k/sec)
I'm downloading it right now but the video's server must also be on dial up! (10k/sec)
01-21-04, 11:45 AM
#7
'Last Minute' Rallying
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Lincoln, England
Posts: 1,193
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
the big deal is that its a competitor and this is a contemporary review from the 80's ... so they are comparing the new RX7 (2nd gen EGI) with the late model 924.
BTW this a second gen vs the 924... for all those waiting for it to download
BTW this a second gen vs the 924... for all those waiting for it to download
Last edited by MikeLMR; 01-21-04 at 11:48 AM.
Trending Topics
01-21-04, 12:17 PM
#8
Originally posted by Rutnick
Isn't a 924 just a 2.0L 4 cylinder? If it is stock, what's the big deal about it vs a RX-7?
Isn't a 924 just a 2.0L 4 cylinder? If it is stock, what's the big deal about it vs a RX-7?
The HP, acceleration, top speed and everything are almost identical. The 924 is slightly faster acceleration and gets better gas milage but cost 4000 pounds more, 18000 vs 14000. The reviewer said he would have a very hard time deciding which one he would buy over the other because they are so closely matched.
There you have it, the comparison in a nutshell.
01-21-04, 02:44 PM
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: KY
Posts: 376
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
ahh..2.5. I thought it was a 2.0. Maybe the first 924s were 2.0. Now I REALLY don't see a point of a 924 vs a second gen except many say the 924 and the 2nd generation have a very similar look.
01-21-04, 05:20 PM
#11
My wife bought me 2 RX-7s
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada
Posts: 2,328
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Yep, it's the 924s. I dl'ed the vid earlier and it's interesting, but man is the host ever BORING. Holy crap, this guy brings an all new meaning to dry.
01-21-04, 09:50 PM
#12
<l><l>
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: houston (katy), tx
Posts: 168
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by Tom93R1
2.5L
The HP, acceleration, top speed and everything are almost identical. The 924 is slightly faster acceleration and gets better gas milage but cost 4000 pounds more, 18000 vs 14000. The reviewer said he would have a very hard time deciding which one he would buy over the other because they are so closely matched.
There you have it, the comparison in a nutshell.
2.5L
The HP, acceleration, top speed and everything are almost identical. The 924 is slightly faster acceleration and gets better gas milage but cost 4000 pounds more, 18000 vs 14000. The reviewer said he would have a very hard time deciding which one he would buy over the other because they are so closely matched.
There you have it, the comparison in a nutshell.
j/k i know its price cool movie
<l><l>
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
CaptainKRM
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
14
08-26-15 09:52 PM
