Stock or Modified?
Stock or Modified?
I have a 1982 GSL in perfect running condition with a great body. I plan on doing what little needs to be done to make the car a great automobile, but I also want to lightly modify it so it is a little bit more exciting on the road. I don't plan on messing with the interior though. I like old school. Here's my issue. My friends dad (a piston head) argued that the car would be worth way more stock than modified. I can't imagine ever selling the car anyway, so I don't see the point. Can you guys please tell me if I'm being an ignorant douche? I just want some different opinions on this issue.
peace.
peace.
I think it all depends on the car. Like a bone stock 1968 Camaro in great shape, is gonna be worth more ALOT stock than if you modified it. But in the case of the RX-7, I think that modifying them is gonna raise the value...for now wtleast, maybe 20 more years down the road, they'll be a lot more desirable, and the stock ones will be worth more. I say mod it.
I save every stock part I remove, and enjoy the RB exhaust system/swaybar, newer stereo/mp3player, etc. but everything (with the exception of the bodycoloured console waterfall) can be unbolted and changed back to stock.




