When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Hey recently I’ve been looking into the design/engineering of the rotary engine and was wondering something that is probably pretty stupid but i will ask nonetheless. Why is the intake port inline with the exhaust port? This seems to create an overlap that gives the rotary its signature brap but why was it designed this way from a technical standpoint? Would it not be more fuel/power efficient to move the intake up/closer to the spark plugs so there is no exhaust-intake overlap?
See pic below.
After 270 BDC the rotor enters the compression stage so the intake needs to close around there. That needs to be balanced with making the intake port big enough.
Moving the exhaust port to the side in the RX-8 removed a lot of overlap but the exhaust doesn't flow as well.
you're asking the right questions! we've seen some patent drawings over the years and there was one where the intake and exhaust are actually flipped, so the intake which needs to be kind of long is on the bottom and is an L shape next to the engine, and then this puts the exhaust on top
and then if you look at pics of the new 8C the intake is raised up and angled differently than we are used to seeing the thing on top is a high pressure fuel injector, so its direct injected, which apparently makes a huge difference
you're asking the right questions! we've seen some patent drawings over the years and there was one where the intake and exhaust are actually flipped, so the intake which needs to be kind of long is on the bottom and is an L shape next to the engine, and then this puts the exhaust on top
and then if you look at pics of the new 8C the intake is raised up and angled differently than we are used to seeing the thing on top is a high pressure fuel injector, so its direct injected, which apparently makes a huge difference
so why was the intake originally placed lower down? Is it because it needs more time to atomize the fuel? In any case I suppose I’m asking if the intake could be placed just before compression
so why was the intake originally placed lower down? Is it because it needs more time to atomize the fuel? In any case I suppose I’m asking if the intake could be placed just before compression
i'm not sure why it was placed where it was, probably looked nice or something. they moved it up starting with the Cosmo in the late 80's, but only to make room for the turbos
one of the big differences between the Rotary and a piston engine is that the strokes take place in different physical locations, so essentially the intake IS before the compression.
if you want the piston engine analogy, its like the valve isn't moving, but we are changing the port angle in the head
i'm not sure why it was placed where it was, probably looked nice or something. they moved it up starting with the Cosmo in the late 80's, but only to make room for the turbos
one of the big differences between the Rotary and a piston engine is that the strokes take place in different physical locations, so essentially the intake IS before the compression.
if you want the piston engine analogy, its like the valve isn't moving, but we are changing the port angle in the head
Love how confusing these little engines are hah! So if a rotary was to be redesigned, the intake port could be placed nearer to the spark plugs without any negative effects? Not that I’m planning on doing this, I’m just a curious (for better or for worse) highschooler.
Love how confusing these little engines are hah! So if a rotary was to be redesigned, the intake port could be placed nearer to the spark plugs without any negative effects? Not that I’m planning on doing this, I’m just a curious (for better or for worse) highschooler.
maybe a little, it still needs to have the intake stroke!
the Rx8 engine went the other way, and it moved the exhaust port instead of the intake, essentially