1st Generation Specific (1979-1985) 1979-1985 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections

RE-Speed Steering Rack - Some Questions

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 12, 2008 | 10:56 PM
  #1  
NOPR's Avatar
Thread Starter
Rotary Apprentice
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,181
Likes: 0
From: USA
RE-Speed Steering Rack - Some Questions

First of all, this thing looks badass. This is what I'm talking about in case you're wondering:

http://mrcmfg.com/catalog/index.php?cPath=108_112_133

My questions are:

Has anyone actually finished one of these and driven it? how does it feel? any issues? Any bumpsteer or anything like that? Any adverse handling effects?

It seems like a big task to PROPERLY do a rack and pinion swap, all sorts of **** to worry about with steering geometry, I guess my question is: did they get it right?

were there any issues with fitment or quality of parts?

whats up with the double u-joint in the steering shaft? it doesnt look like thats necessary based on the pictures i've seen, can one u-joint not compensate for the angle required? or is there something it would interfere with that i don't see? Should I even care that there are two U-joints?

Any response is appreciated, I'm VERY excited about this kit and re-speed seems to have their **** together, I'm just wondering if there's anyone with some real world experience can share that I may overlook before I drop almost a grand on the kit.
Reply
Old Jul 13, 2008 | 12:17 AM
  #2  
dj55b's Avatar
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 6,122
Likes: 1
From: London, Ontario
I have one installed in my car with a quick ratio rack. The quality and fitment are more than perfect. I have also bought their front sway bar, and heat shield which are all just as good as you'd expect. As for the double joint on the steering shaft itself, its a double collapsable joint area. What that means is that if you ever get in a crash, the shaft that goes up to the steering wheel can collapse in 2 areas instead of being forced up to your chest. Its a safety thing
Reply
Old Jul 13, 2008 | 12:27 AM
  #3  
Sgt Fox's Avatar
Stigulus Moderatorai
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,109
Likes: 32
From: Canada
I currently have the kit, and have used it for 3 months or so. The kit is well build, very well thought out and an absolute pleasure to drive. I have no issues with bump steer, nor does it tram line or anything to that nature. The rack does not bind going over bumps and into parking lots either.

There are a few minor issues that I ran into.

First, the kit doesn't seem to like 13" stock wheels. I didn't have any luck with MOOG or Beck/Arnley outer tie rod ends, as they would rub on the wheels. The Mazda stock outer tie rod ends cleared the wheels with 2mm clearance. I ended up going with a set of 15" anyway.

The only other thing that I had to do was ground the steering rack. The horn uses the steering shaft as a ground, and the rack is isolated from the body. A simple fix.
Reply
Old Jul 13, 2008 | 07:53 AM
  #4  
NOPR's Avatar
Thread Starter
Rotary Apprentice
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,181
Likes: 0
From: USA
Originally Posted by Sgt Fox
I currently have the kit, and have used it for 3 months or so. The kit is well build, very well thought out and an absolute pleasure to drive. I have no issues with bump steer, nor does it tram line or anything to that nature. The rack does not bind going over bumps and into parking lots either.
this is what I wanted to hear!

Originally Posted by Sgt Fox
There are a few minor issues that I ran into.

First, the kit doesn't seem to like 13" stock wheels. I didn't have any luck with MOOG or Beck/Arnley outer tie rod ends, as they would rub on the wheels. The Mazda stock outer tie rod ends cleared the wheels with 2mm clearance. I ended up going with a set of 15" anyway.

The only other thing that I had to do was ground the steering rack. The horn uses the steering shaft as a ground, and the rack is isolated from the body. A simple fix.
If those are the biggest 'issues' than I dont think I'm gonna have any problems. I'm definitely ordering one of these in the near future.
Reply
Old Jul 13, 2008 | 11:04 AM
  #5  
Re-Speed.com's Avatar
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 2,483
Likes: 1
From: London, Ontario
Originally Posted by NOPR
First of all, this thing looks badass. This is what I'm talking about in case you're wondering:

http://mrcmfg.com/catalog/index.php?cPath=108_112_133

My questions are:

Has anyone actually finished one of these and driven it? how does it feel? any issues? Any bumpsteer or anything like that? Any adverse handling effects?

It seems like a big task to PROPERLY do a rack and pinion swap, all sorts of **** to worry about with steering geometry, I guess my question is: did they get it right?

were there any issues with fitment or quality of parts?

whats up with the double u-joint in the steering shaft? it doesnt look like thats necessary based on the pictures i've seen, can one u-joint not compensate for the angle required? or is there something it would interfere with that i don't see? Should I even care that there are two U-joints?

Any response is appreciated, I'm VERY excited about this kit and re-speed seems to have their **** together, I'm just wondering if there's anyone with some real world experience can share that I may overlook before I drop almost a grand on the kit.

Should be some more guys post shortly. There are 50+ kits out there at the moment.

Just a bit if info for you. The kit was in design and testing over a year before we went to market. We scrapped at least 3 designs before ending on this one. EVERY suspension and steering characteristic was looked at thoroughly.

The kit serves way more than simply a rack conversion. There is more adjustability than stock and some of the adjustments are completely new to the first generation chassis.

Thank you for the interest and we look forward to building you a kit.


-billy
Reply
Old Jul 14, 2008 | 07:48 AM
  #6  
dbragg's Avatar
Say hello to Mr.Wankel
Tenured Member 05 Years
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 5,962
Likes: 1
From: Cartersville, Ga
I have driven the Respeed car with the rack. it felt AMAZING. with steering the car just felt so solid and confident. i loved it. its on my list of things to buy when i get money.
Reply
Old Jul 14, 2008 | 09:27 AM
  #7  
82transam's Avatar
Never Follow
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 8,389
Likes: 120
From: North Jersey
I have the kit on both my FB's and as the others said its a very well made kit and feels very solid while driving. As one would expect there is no slop and totally transforms the feel of the car. I drove one of my FB's to work today and it is 100 times more stable on the highway, no more wandering within the lane or any of that...

One thing I did notice on both cars is that with the new shorter steering arms it has much more Ackerman angle (I believe thats the term for the difference in angle between the two wheels) especially at full lock. So much so that the wheels seem to fight themselves when trying to make really tight turns, like in a parking lot or something. It happens with both left and right turns, the outside wheel is at a much great angle than the inside wheel....Has anyone else come across this?
Reply
Old Jul 14, 2008 | 09:56 AM
  #8  
Sgt Fox's Avatar
Stigulus Moderatorai
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,109
Likes: 32
From: Canada
Originally Posted by 82transam
I have the kit on both my FB's and as the others said its a very well made kit and feels very solid while driving. As one would expect there is no slop and totally transforms the feel of the car. I drove one of my FB's to work today and it is 100 times more stable on the highway, no more wandering within the lane or any of that...

One thing I did notice on both cars is that with the new shorter steering arms it has much more Ackerman angle (I believe thats the term for the difference in angle between the two wheels) especially at full lock. So much so that the wheels seem to fight themselves when trying to make really tight turns, like in a parking lot or something. It happens with both left and right turns, the outside wheel is at a much great angle than the inside wheel....Has anyone else come across this?
I was under the impression that the aluminum steering arms were to fix this problem? I personally haven't noticed it.
Reply
Old Jul 14, 2008 | 10:09 AM
  #9  
82transam's Avatar
Never Follow
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 8,389
Likes: 120
From: North Jersey
I wonder if anyone else has come across this, both my cars do it. It's only really noticable if you are trying to manuver into a tight parking spot or doing a U-turn or something. It's certainly not the end of the world just something I noticed.
Reply
Old Jul 14, 2008 | 10:28 AM
  #10  
Re-Speed.com's Avatar
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 2,483
Likes: 1
From: London, Ontario
I knew there would be more guys post as time went on with the post.


Originally Posted by Sgt Fox
I was under the impression that the aluminum steering arms were to fix this problem? I personally haven't noticed it.
Originally Posted by 82transam
I wonder if anyone else has come across this, both my cars do it. It's only really noticable if you are trying to manuver into a tight parking spot or doing a U-turn or something. It's certainly not the end of the world just something I noticed.
The new aluminum steering arm that were introduced and made standard on the kit was to improve the ackerman. They made huge leaps over the use of the stock arms.

They do not 100% eliminate it, more like a 80% change over stock arms. It is only a full lock in parking lots as mentioned and hardly noticeable to most.

We feel the current arms are the proper solution between the variables.

-billy
Reply
Old Jul 14, 2008 | 11:22 AM
  #11  
82transam's Avatar
Never Follow
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 8,389
Likes: 120
From: North Jersey
Ah so the stock arms had more ackerman then? I guess I'm picturing the whole thing wrong in my head then....

I just read the original post again and figured I'd respond further. Bumpsteer doesn't seem to be an issue at all, the car handles very well, feels very planted even on very rough roads (there are plenty around here)

Don't concern yourself with the double U-joint once you see it all in person you'll see it is nessesary to connect everything, and they are also using it as further protection in a crash (it will collapse along with the rest of the column)

A few other little things I'll throw out there;
The motor mount is notably stiffer than stock, so it will transmit more vibration through the car. Not a show stopper, but something to keep in mind.
It's also not the easiest thing in the world to align, but once you get it dialed in you probably won't touch it again, so again not a big deal.

As far as the installation goes, if you have a 81-85 steering box you don't need to take it apart to get the parts you need. The outer tube simply slides out, and you can then take the top half of the steering shaft apart, leaving the bottom half and the box itself in tact. Took maybe 10 mins total to modify the shaft once the box was out of the car. I also had problems with the steering arms sitting too low on the ball joint, turned out to be cheap ball joints not made to spec. The ball joints Black Dragon/Victoria British sell work out great.

Just give yourself plenty of time to install it and you'll be good to go!
Reply
Old Jul 14, 2008 | 01:18 PM
  #12  
Sgt Fox's Avatar
Stigulus Moderatorai
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,109
Likes: 32
From: Canada
Originally Posted by 82transam
A few other little things I'll throw out there;
The motor mount is notably stiffer than stock, so it will transmit more vibration through the car. Not a show stopper, but something to keep in mind.
I didn't care for the vibration at first, felt kind of weird. However after driving for a few days, it didn't bother me and the improvements in the steering were enough to make a little vibration minuscule. Its actually cool how you can feel your engine more.
Reply
Old Jul 14, 2008 | 01:35 PM
  #13  
82transam's Avatar
Never Follow
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 8,389
Likes: 120
From: North Jersey
Yeah, I'll second that, at first the vibration was annoying, but I've been driving it for the past week and I'm starting to get used to it.
Also agreed that the vast improvment in steering feel makes up for some of the minor issues.
Reply
Old Jul 14, 2008 | 06:38 PM
  #14  
NOPR's Avatar
Thread Starter
Rotary Apprentice
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,181
Likes: 0
From: USA
my current FC has delrin mounts, I don't think I'll mind the vibration. Besides, the motor will be balanced by carlos lopez up to 8500 RPM so I should be okay.
Reply
Old Jul 15, 2008 | 09:27 AM
  #15  
82transam's Avatar
Never Follow
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 8,389
Likes: 120
From: North Jersey
I'm surprised no one else has responeded yet, me sam and fox can't be the only 3 to have installed their kits.....
Reply
Old Jul 15, 2008 | 10:02 AM
  #16  
dj55b's Avatar
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 6,122
Likes: 1
From: London, Ontario
the rest are just too cool to post :P
Reply
Old Jul 15, 2008 | 10:06 AM
  #17  
JSmith0101's Avatar
Play Well
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 2,424
Likes: 1
From: Green Bay, WI
Now, which kits do you guys have? The stage II?

If I want to upgrade my steering, which would you recommend?
Reply
Old Jul 15, 2008 | 10:14 AM
  #18  
82transam's Avatar
Never Follow
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 8,389
Likes: 120
From: North Jersey
You'll need the stage 2 kit for the steering upgrade, otherwise you just get the crossmember. I think most of us opted for the 15:1 rack as well might as well get faster steering while you're at it....
Reply
Old Jul 15, 2008 | 10:18 AM
  #19  
JSmith0101's Avatar
Play Well
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 2,424
Likes: 1
From: Green Bay, WI
Originally Posted by 82transam
You'll need the stage 2 kit for the steering upgrade, otherwise you just get the crossmember. I think most of us opted for the 15:1 rack as well might as well get faster steering while you're at it....
So you're looking at over $1000 (crossmember and rack), but get a damn good upgrade? Do you just use an engine hoist to keep the engine out of the way, or remove it?

I guess I have bigger fish to fry right now, but I'd like to do this upgrade, in a year or so, probably when I go 13BT.
Reply
Old Jul 15, 2008 | 10:21 AM
  #20  
SunRedRX7's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 136
Likes: 2
From: Kenmore, NY
Originally Posted by Sgt Fox
First, the kit doesn't seem to like 13" stock wheels. I didn't have any luck with MOOG or Beck/Arnley outer tie rod ends, as they would rub on the wheels. The Mazda stock outer tie rod ends cleared the wheels with 2mm clearance. I ended up going with a set of 15" anyway.
Can anyone else comment on the 13" wheels rubbing on the tie rods? and I'm guessing as Sgt Fox stated using the stock Mazda tie rod ends will work?

I plan on ordering the kit for Christmas, and my 79 has stock sized 13" rims on it that I plan on keeping on the car. If it makes a difference the spindles/brakes have been upgraded to the ones on the 85(12a) model.

Thanks,

Mike
Reply
Old Jul 15, 2008 | 10:29 AM
  #21  
82transam's Avatar
Never Follow
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 8,389
Likes: 120
From: North Jersey
To answer both questions yes its over $1000 by the time you are done and yes I used a engine crane to hold the engine. I basically switched crossmembers first so I could get the crane out of the way. The instructions have you put the cross member in last.
As for the 13" wheels, in order to get them to fit with my aftermarket tie rods I had to grind a little bit off the bottom of the tie rod. Definatly not the best solution ever, but I haven't had the chance to order Mazda tie rods yet. I would like to say that they barely rubbed, and I didnt have to remove much, but its still a very tight fit.
Reply
Old Aug 13, 2008 | 03:05 AM
  #22  
SilverArrow's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 74
Likes: 0
From: Costa Mesa, CA
Anyone know if the crossmember increases oil pan clearance? It looks like it would, moving the steering to the front side...
Reply
Old Aug 13, 2008 | 08:36 AM
  #23  
Re-Speed.com's Avatar
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 2,483
Likes: 1
From: London, Ontario
Yes, the front area where the pan dips can be larger. The rear section will still need to dip up to clear a support bar included in the kit. If you would like the sump larger in the rear portion you can always make a special support bar the bends down.

-billy
Reply
Old Mar 5, 2009 | 01:33 PM
  #24  
thunkrd's Avatar
i'm a poser
Tenured Member 05 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,919
Likes: 0
From: san leandro, Ca
how much of a weight difference is the kit compared to stock? will be getting one next month i think
Reply
Old Mar 5, 2009 | 01:54 PM
  #25  
dj55b's Avatar
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 6,122
Likes: 1
From: London, Ontario
I'm not 100% sure but it might be a couple of pounds not that much but its still something.
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:41 AM.