1st Generation Specific (1979-1985) 1979-1985 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections

RB header and fuel economy

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 19, 2003 | 12:26 PM
  #1  
MosesX605's Avatar
Thread Starter
My wife bought me 2 RX-7s
Tenured Member 20 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 2,328
Likes: 3
From: Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada
RB header and fuel economy

I recently installed my RB header, and I've noticed a drop in fuel economy, down from 17 mpg city to 15 mpg. This has been observed consistently for more than one tank now. Has anyone else observed a drop in economy with the header system? I was under the impression that it would actually increase my economy, or at least have no effect.

Now, the '79 carb runs fairly rich because of the way that the thermal reactor works, so perhaps I could go to a later carb that runs leaner and gain some economy that way? The jets in the carb I have now aren't any bigger than the later model's have, so it must be something else in the '79 carb that makes it run so rich. Could I swap the internals like the air bleeds, jets emulsion tubes, etc from a later model into my carb?

Comments and suggestions are appreciated.
Reply
Old Sep 19, 2003 | 06:11 PM
  #2  
LongDuck's Avatar
84SE-EGI helpy-helperton
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 3,584
Likes: 542
From: Phoenix, AZ
My experience with headers is on both my 80LS (12A), and my 84SE (13B) is that addition of headers doesn't do much for increasing fuel economy, and here's why;

1) when you install the headers, you're usually doing it to gain performance. Once installed, you're so thrilled at the additional 'breatheability' that you have, that you often put your foot into it to enjoy the investment of you hard-earned money. This doesn't help fuel economy.

2) The headers, while making the extraction of exhaust gases more efficient, increases total airflow through the engine, since a freer flowing exhaust will have impacts on the total amount of air that can be ingested by the intake system. You free up the exhaust, you also free up the intake. More air requires more fuel for stoichiometric balance, therefore fuel economy drops.

These 2 reasons are the primary reason why I've noticed not a whole lot of change in my fuel mileage, particularly a drop with my 84SE. On the SE, I think there is a better control over fuel mix given the EFI, however I KNOW that I tend to drive it harder because it's more fun to drive that way. Plus, the '6'-ports don't open until 3800 (!).

I have been able to see some increases in fuel mileage if I am very, very light on the throttle, getting sometimes as much as 22 mpg for mostly highway driving. My city averages at around 16-17, and when I drive like a madman, it drops to about 15. Never much lower than that. Also, I tend to use cruise control a lot on the freeway on the SE, which helps to conserve fuel usage.

Hope this insight helps. Headers, while providing more performance, don't tend to change fuel mileage for the better, as you can see. I think your findings are in-line with the rest of us on this.
Reply
Old Sep 19, 2003 | 11:34 PM
  #3  
RacerX7fb's Avatar
paradox
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,296
Likes: 2
From: SoCal
Yes I have observed the same thing. While having driven my SE for years with the RB headered system, it became time to smog my car.. so I reinstalled the stock exhaust system. Immediately my butt dyno sensed more low-end torque (with loss of response though) over the full RB header system (which has much better top-end power) All naturally due to a change in the power curve.
Having more low-end to mid range power, the car pulls slightly more without having the need to press down on the gas pedal as much, hence having slightly better fuel economy over the full RB system.
Currently I have been enjoying a setup which I have used before.. stock exhaust manifold to a custom made downpipe connected to the RB presilencer...similar to the RB setup for the 2nd gen. Now I enjoy the best of both worlds.. better low to midrange torque and only slightly diminishing the top-end power (I dont drive my car around keeping it at redline all the time anyways) ..makes me wanna go ahead and sell the header
For those who are on a budget I would simply recommend a cat replacement pipe, since the stock catalytic converters are the true power robbers of the exhaust system.
Im tired... hope this made some sense

Last edited by RacerX7fb; Sep 19, 2003 at 11:36 PM.
Reply
Old Sep 19, 2003 | 11:57 PM
  #4  
diabolical1's Avatar
Moderator
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 10,998
Likes: 349
From: FL
Originally posted by LongDuck
... 1) when you install the headers, you're usually doing it to gain performance. Once installed, you're so thrilled at the additional 'breatheability' that you have, that you often put your foot into it to enjoy the investment of you hard-earned money. This doesn't help fuel economy ...
this would be exactly what i'd would suspect at first thought. as long as nothing else has changed on the car, i'd suspect your driving habits with the new power or an exhaust leak somewhere.

BTW ... you might want to retune your stock carbie as far as jets and emulsion tubes and what-not ... maybe you should shoot a PM to Sterling or Rx7Carl, but i don't see why your stock 79 carbie shouldn't give you what any other would.
Reply
Old Sep 20, 2003 | 06:10 AM
  #5  
RotorMotorDriver's Avatar
Seven Is Coming
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 6,503
Likes: 4
From: Washington
Weird...My gas mileage went up from 14 MPG to 17 MPG after I installed the exhaust on my otherwise bone stock 85 GSL, lol .

~T.J.
Reply
Old Sep 20, 2003 | 10:33 AM
  #6  
ray green's Avatar
Gone
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 11,442
Likes: 210
I agree with Racer, headers are over rated

Ray
Reply
Old Sep 20, 2003 | 01:11 PM
  #7  
851stgen12a's Avatar
Off riding sportbikes!
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,154
Likes: 0
From: Vancouver Wa
My milage went from 15mpg, to between 18 and 20mpg after I put on the new exhaust.
Reply
Old Sep 20, 2003 | 01:37 PM
  #8  
erick1120's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 136
Likes: 0
From: Rainier, Oregon
I really didn't notice a difference when I installed mine. It was a full racing beat exhaust system. Headers, presilecer, muffler.
Reply
Old Sep 20, 2003 | 03:25 PM
  #9  
[FLaT]'s Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 106
Likes: 0
From: Los Angeles
Gas milage didn't change at all for me.

I've got RB headers, presilecer.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:24 AM.