porting question
porting question
i just got my engine rebulid so i went to go see it to see how the process is going it turns out the guy didnt really street port it he just ported the exhaust ports and it wasnt that big of a difference and he already put the engine in...,would i have to rebuild the motor again if i want to REALLY streetport it(i aint planning on doing it myself)...
A 12A will actually pickup quite a bit from porting the exhaust. The stock exhaust ports are tiny. Comparing the intake ports of a 12A to a 13B shows little real difference, yet the exhaust is a totally different story. 12A exhaust ports compared to 13B, resemble a dime sitting beside a quarter...........
Originally Posted by Rogue_Wulff
A 12A will actually pickup quite a bit from porting the exhaust. The stock exhaust ports are tiny. Comparing the intake ports of a 12A to a 13B shows little real difference, yet the exhaust is a totally different story. 12A exhaust ports compared to 13B, resemble a dime sitting beside a quarter...........
...i cant wait!!
Trending Topics
He's probably just used to working with second gens, which, for the most part, have six ports. It's not considered safe to port the intake ports on a 6 port, so they DONT. Therefor, if you take your 12A to a 'specialist' who only has experience with FC/FDs, then you wont get a REAL port job.
Originally Posted by mr.12a
man that sucks i guess ill just stay with this motor for now and later on tear it down and port it...thanks guys
Our 12A tallports as we call them(they are from the factory), have very large ports from the factory compared to TII 13b turbos. I've seen quite a few pulled down, and the 12A ports from the factory are hudge compared to 13bt intake ports.
I didn't really get any good looks at exhaust ports.
See some pics of my motor before and after extend porting(street porting) has been done to the intake and exhausts.
I don't have a pic of 13bt turbo exhaust or intake but i can tell you the intake is puny compared to the ones i'm showing you


Eats, Sleeps, Dreams Rotary
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 3,247
Likes: 2
From: Allentown, PA - Paterson, NJ
Nice port job! I like the shape and size of those ports. I also just finished porting out my exhaust and intake. No templates used. I think porting from the back side of the the exhaust port and using the port sleeve as your guide is the best way to go about it. I may be wrong but the exhaust note is sweet and the overall increase in performance is just fantastic!* I also went large on the secondary ports and mild but wide (fat) on the primary ports. I'll post some pics if I get a chance.
Originally Posted by gsterror
He's probably just used to working with second gens, which, for the most part, have six ports. It's not considered safe to port the intake ports on a 6 port, so they DONT. Therefor, if you take your 12A to a 'specialist' who only has experience with FC/FDs, then you wont get a REAL port job.
i've never heard that?
im really interested in this in this six port subject because im planning on doing a port job on one myself,with templates of course and i just wanted to know how "unsafe" it is to port the intake port?
is there less room for mistakes than a four port?
Well, go to www.mazdatrix.com, they have a writeup about it (They refuse to port the intake on a 6 port)
Thats not correct. They will do the Intake
http://www.mazdatrix.com/s.htm
You are thinking of the 6-Port Exhaust.
" The 86-92 non-turbo rotor housings have a "splitter" (also called a "diffuser") in the middle of the exhaust port. These are part of the casting of the sleeve insert, and are VERY hard metal. We do not do any porting on these rotor housings! If we are assembling a "ported" 86-92 6-port engine, we use the Turbo rotor housings, which do not have the sleeve."
http://www.mazdatrix.com/faq/6pexh.htm
http://www.mazdatrix.com/s.htm
You are thinking of the 6-Port Exhaust.
" The 86-92 non-turbo rotor housings have a "splitter" (also called a "diffuser") in the middle of the exhaust port. These are part of the casting of the sleeve insert, and are VERY hard metal. We do not do any porting on these rotor housings! If we are assembling a "ported" 86-92 6-port engine, we use the Turbo rotor housings, which do not have the sleeve."
http://www.mazdatrix.com/faq/6pexh.htm
Originally Posted by glosoli
i've never heard that?
im really interested in this in this six port subject because im planning on doing a port job on one myself,with templates of course and i just wanted to know how "unsafe" it is to port the intake port?
is there less room for mistakes than a four port?
im really interested in this in this six port subject because im planning on doing a port job on one myself,with templates of course and i just wanted to know how "unsafe" it is to port the intake port?
is there less room for mistakes than a four port?

The only aspect of porting you can't do to a 6-port is retard the secondary closing timing, since the auxiliary ports already close so late. You can still advance the opening timing of both primary and secondary ports and retard the closing of the primary ports. These primary ports are so small that any change is significant.
I have personally ported several 6-port engines, always with positive results. My first was on my GRM Challenge race car in 2001. Even running out of fuel at mid-track, I did a 14.7 quarter mile. This was with the stock exhaust manifold, a cat replacement pipe, the stock cat-back and the stock intake. One of our 2nd gen customers came in recently and showed us his dyno results. This was a Series 5 NA with a streetport, oil mods and our 6-port inserts. Full exhaust, E-fan, RB main pulley, etc. 189.9 HP (@6500) at the wheels, with 158.2 ft lbs torque (@6000) with an almost completely flat powerband! I think that's a bit more than even we anticipated, but it shows you that there is definitely potential.
Originally Posted by Blake
There is absolutely no issue with porting 6-port engines. He is probably confused by the (mistaken, IMO) statements by some that there is little or no performance potential by porting a 6-port engine. It pains me to say that Jim Mederer, of Racing Beat, is one of those people...I respect him but somehow I suspect his opinion is based on insufficient experimentation with this particular motor. We have seen great results.
The only aspect of porting you can't do to a 6-port is retard the secondary closing timing, since the auxiliary ports already close so late. You can still advance the opening timing of both primary and secondary ports and retard the closing of the primary ports. These primary ports are so small that any change is significant.
I have personally ported several 6-port engines, always with positive results. My first was on my GRM Challenge race car in 2001. Even running out of fuel at mid-track, I did a 14.7 quarter mile. This was with the stock exhaust manifold, a cat replacement pipe, the stock cat-back and the stock intake. One of our 2nd gen customers came in recently and showed us his dyno results. This was a Series 5 NA with a streetport, oil mods and our 6-port inserts. Full exhaust, E-fan, RB main pulley, etc. 189.9 HP (@6500) at the wheels, with 158.2 ft lbs torque (@6000) with an almost completely flat powerband! I think that's a bit more than even we anticipated, but it shows you that there is definitely potential.
The only aspect of porting you can't do to a 6-port is retard the secondary closing timing, since the auxiliary ports already close so late. You can still advance the opening timing of both primary and secondary ports and retard the closing of the primary ports. These primary ports are so small that any change is significant.
I have personally ported several 6-port engines, always with positive results. My first was on my GRM Challenge race car in 2001. Even running out of fuel at mid-track, I did a 14.7 quarter mile. This was with the stock exhaust manifold, a cat replacement pipe, the stock cat-back and the stock intake. One of our 2nd gen customers came in recently and showed us his dyno results. This was a Series 5 NA with a streetport, oil mods and our 6-port inserts. Full exhaust, E-fan, RB main pulley, etc. 189.9 HP (@6500) at the wheels, with 158.2 ft lbs torque (@6000) with an almost completely flat powerband! I think that's a bit more than even we anticipated, but it shows you that there is definitely potential.
good stuff
So, percent, what do you figure the gain is on a ported 6 port?
I'm taking a few different first gens in to the dyno this weekend, so I'll have scans up of these (all 12A)
82 GS
full RB
Yaw
Carter FP
FPR
VERY mild streetport (so mild it might as well not be there)
DLIFDIS
83 GSL
aggressive SP
RB full SP exhaust
Yaw
Carter
FPR
Jay's black FB
Stockport
Presilencer-post exhaust
Yaw
Carter
FPR
I think it'll be a great comparison between all three (I'm gonna run my 82 first, and while the 83's running, I'll slap the headers on the black car, that way we can see the difference that porting gives)
I'm taking a few different first gens in to the dyno this weekend, so I'll have scans up of these (all 12A)
82 GS
full RB
Yaw
Carter FP
FPR
VERY mild streetport (so mild it might as well not be there)
DLIFDIS
83 GSL
aggressive SP
RB full SP exhaust
Yaw
Carter
FPR
Jay's black FB
Stockport
Presilencer-post exhaust
Yaw
Carter
FPR
I think it'll be a great comparison between all three (I'm gonna run my 82 first, and while the 83's running, I'll slap the headers on the black car, that way we can see the difference that porting gives)
Originally Posted by gsterror
So, percent, what do you figure the gain is on a ported 6 port?
I'm taking a few different first gens in to the dyno this weekend, so I'll have scans up of these (all 12A)
82 GS
full RB
Yaw
Carter FP
FPR
VERY mild streetport (so mild it might as well not be there)
DLIFDIS
83 GSL
aggressive SP
RB full SP exhaust
Yaw
Carter
FPR
Jay's black FB
Stockport
Presilencer-post exhaust
Yaw
Carter
FPR
I think it'll be a great comparison between all three (I'm gonna run my 82 first, and while the 83's running, I'll slap the headers on the black car, that way we can see the difference that porting gives)
I'm taking a few different first gens in to the dyno this weekend, so I'll have scans up of these (all 12A)
82 GS
full RB
Yaw
Carter FP
FPR
VERY mild streetport (so mild it might as well not be there)
DLIFDIS
83 GSL
aggressive SP
RB full SP exhaust
Yaw
Carter
FPR
Jay's black FB
Stockport
Presilencer-post exhaust
Yaw
Carter
FPR
I think it'll be a great comparison between all three (I'm gonna run my 82 first, and while the 83's running, I'll slap the headers on the black car, that way we can see the difference that porting gives)
you should totally keep us updated on the outcome of this.
im really interested in the results
mazdatrix says the housing is junk if you go into the water jacket. this is total crap! you can weld or epoxy it back and get the port timing you want with no adverse reliability consequences.
Eats, Sleeps, Dreams Rotary
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 3,247
Likes: 2
From: Allentown, PA - Paterson, NJ
Originally Posted by GUITARJUNKIE28
mazdatrix says the housing is junk if you go into the water jacket. this is total crap! you can weld or epoxy it back and get the port timing you want with no adverse reliability consequences.
Blake/GUITARJUNKIE : Do either of you guys have a good recommendation on a template for a 6 port (GSL-SE)? I am going to be opening it up to replace some seals and springs and would like to port it if I have the time/tools. I always figured there should be some good gains with porting a 6 port (maybe not as much of a gain as 4 ports, though). You always read about porting them not being worth it, difficult, etc., so that is what has discouraged me from doing it in the past.
Kent
Kent
Originally Posted by GUITARJUNKIE28
and speaking of which...you should see what i'm doing to my renesis irons 






