1st Generation Specific (1979-1985) 1979-1985 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections

oil coolers

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 19, 2013 | 10:17 AM
  #1  
Dave.Martin2008's Avatar
Thread Starter
Anti piston
 
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 318
Likes: 0
From: Iowa
IA oil coolers

so I have been searching on here for info on why Mazda changed their oil cooler design between 1982-1983 from a front mount to a top mounted oil cooler. Does anyone know what the pros and cons are to running each separate or can a person run both to help cool the oil more? I have both but I am trying to figure out the best setup on my 12a stock with a custom tubular header. Thanks for the info.
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2013 | 11:02 AM
  #2  
diabolical1's Avatar
Moderator
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 10,998
Likes: 349
From: FL
can't say i know why it was done, but i can say it was 1983-85 that they used the beehive.

i prefer the air cooler. it has more volume and will take you much farther power-wise.

for me, the beehive is simpler. also (in my particular experiences) they don't leak.

i don't have hard temperature data on either of them. that said, i have never had reason to suspect one was better based on stock gauge indications.

i'm sure you can create a way to run both if you wanted to, but i honestly don't see the point to it. on a stock or stock-ish 12A you can run either cooler without worry. i think the beehives were rated up to something like 180-ish and i don't doubt that some may have even run it at higher power levels.
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2013 | 11:30 AM
  #3  
Dave.Martin2008's Avatar
Thread Starter
Anti piston
 
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 318
Likes: 0
From: Iowa
Well I will strip the air oil cooler and save it then for now... I am currently looking for my shopping list to remove my rats nest.
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2013 | 01:32 PM
  #4  
j9fd3s's Avatar
Moderator
Community Builder
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 31,835
Likes: 3,233
From: https://www2.mazda.com/en/100th/
i think i've seen reference in the Mazda literature to the beehive being less expensive, and it is simpler.
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2013 | 02:23 PM
  #5  
wankel=awesome's Avatar
carb whisperer
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,485
Likes: 4
From: Greenfield, Ohio
Originally Posted by j9fd3s
i think i've seen reference in the Mazda literature to the beehive being less expensive, and it is simpler.
I dont know about you guys, but try rebuilding either one of them. The choice will become obvious haha.
Reply
Old Oct 20, 2013 | 05:22 PM
  #6  
Tui's Avatar
Tui
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 315
Likes: 1
From: California
Would there be much advantage to add the what you called the bee hive oil cooler when I already have a front mount oil cooler?
Reply
Old Oct 20, 2013 | 07:31 PM
  #7  
7aull's Avatar
RX HVN
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 3,889
Likes: 229
From: Arizona
The fact ALL mazda rotaries used the FMOC (Front Mounted Oil Cooler - under the rad) up to the 1983
beehive "experiment" then went BACK to the FMOC style thru FC, FD and RX8s tells me everything about which system Mazda (and any other manufacturer trying to cool oil) thinks works best...

Stu Aull
80 GS (FMOC'd...)
Alaska
Reply
Old Oct 20, 2013 | 08:54 PM
  #8  
Dave.Martin2008's Avatar
Thread Starter
Anti piston
 
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 318
Likes: 0
From: Iowa
I guess my bigest concern is if I run both will my oil pump be good enough to push though them both or do I have to remove the beehive to run the under rad style?
Reply
Old Oct 21, 2013 | 01:42 AM
  #9  
Sgt.Stinkfist's Avatar
premix, for f's sake
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,438
Likes: 5
From: madison, WI
itll be much more work than it would really ever be worth, esp as both coolers get oil from the same spot on the front cover, which would mean that you would have to make your own t-fitting for a parallel setup, or a full re-plumbing of everything for a series system. If you want to run 2 oil coolers, ide say just to run a pair of FMOC's
Reply
Old Oct 21, 2013 | 07:22 AM
  #10  
diabolical1's Avatar
Moderator
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 10,998
Likes: 349
From: FL
Originally Posted by Dave.Martin2008
I guess my bigest concern is if I run both will my oil pump be good enough to push though them both or do I have to remove the beehive to run the under rad style?
you're over-complicating your life right now. for stock or stock-ish HP you simply don't need that. make sure your cooling system is functioning well and the oil temperatures should be fine with either the air cooler OR the beehive. both are not NEEDED. if (or when) you need more oil cooling, you still DON'T WANT the beehive in the system.
Reply
Old Oct 21, 2013 | 09:26 AM
  #11  
Dave.Martin2008's Avatar
Thread Starter
Anti piston
 
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 318
Likes: 0
From: Iowa
Originally Posted by diabolical1

you're over-complicating your life right now. for stock or stock-ish HP you simply don't need that. make sure your cooling system is functioning well and the oil temperatures should be fine with either the air cooler OR the beehive. both are not NEEDED. if (or when) you need more oil cooling, you still DON'T WANT the beehive in the system.
Thanks that answers my question... I am going to change it over to the air cooled oil cooler uunder the rad.
Reply
Old Oct 21, 2013 | 11:03 AM
  #12  
KansasCityREPU's Avatar
Out In the Barn
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 6,704
Likes: 1,250
From: KC
Also remember that over cooling the oil can be just as bad as running to hot. I went with an aftermarket FMOC in my 1985 GSL but added an inline oil temp thermostat so the oil would come up to temp and not try to push heavy oil.
Reply
Old Oct 21, 2013 | 02:46 PM
  #13  
DreamInRotary's Avatar
Always Wanting to Learn
Tenured Member 05 Years
iTrader: (49)
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 3,078
Likes: 42
From: Cambridge, Minnesota
Just go FMOC, it's much simpler and performs much better than the "oil heater" behive style. Requires some parts and man hours but is worth it in the end.
Reply
Old Oct 21, 2013 | 03:15 PM
  #14  
j9fd3s's Avatar
Moderator
Community Builder
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 31,835
Likes: 3,233
From: https://www2.mazda.com/en/100th/
racing beat used to have a nice article in the paper catalog, the gist being that the beehive is ok on the street up to the point where you're porting the engine, after that you need the front mount cooler.

on the street the beehive is nice, it warms up the oil more quickly, and keeps them there.

the big problem is that with the beehive the water cools the oil, so the radiator becomes more important, and if that isn't 100% everything runs hot, essentially you have all your eggs in one basket
Reply
Old Oct 21, 2013 | 08:23 PM
  #15  
Tui's Avatar
Tui
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 315
Likes: 1
From: California
Got it.

Thanks.
Reply
Old Oct 25, 2013 | 12:17 PM
  #16  
chris_g's Avatar
Always Learning
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (29)
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 684
Likes: 1
From: Western NY
Only thing I will say about the FMOC, make sure you mount it correctly. My first FMOC on the widebody was overtightened and put too much stress on the bungs and cracked on the way to a show. That was embarrassing.

The other one just cracked three weeks ago due to weak rubber on the mounting bracket causing it to "wobble" and hit the crossbar in the front. Stress again. This time, I will be pushing the bottom of the radiator out with a very small spacer to move it away from that bar.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
stickmantijuana
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
13
Jan 9, 2018 11:19 AM
troym55
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
23
May 25, 2016 12:42 PM
tiger18
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
9
Sep 3, 2015 08:27 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:13 AM.