1st Generation Specific (1979-1985) 1979-1985 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections

measuring and adjusting camber, caster & toe-in

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 24, 2002 | 11:51 AM
  #26  
inittab's Avatar
Thread Starter
I read your email
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 2,624
Likes: 1
From: NW New Jersey
Originally posted by jeremy
the point were the strut bolts on is offset towards ONE screw. i think everyone would want the extra camber so that screw goes on the inside.
Ah, okay, I think I now understand what the arrow means that's on top of the stock strut! It points to direction of camber/caster, I assume negative but it could be positive. So, if I understand this correctly, if you point the arrow towards the front/inside mounting hole then the camber would be set negative and caster would be set positive. If you point the arrow to the back/inside then you would have negative camber and negative caster. Is this correct or is it the opposite way?

HOMEWORK ASSIGNMENT EVERYONE: Okay rotorheads, go out and look at the little arrow on top rim of your stock struts and report back here on which way they point! Go! Do it now! please..... Maybe we can get some sort of consensus.

Thanks!

Mine was set to:

right side: front/inner
left side: rear/inner
Reply
Old May 24, 2002 | 12:17 PM
  #27  
jeremy's Avatar
male stripper
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 3,126
Likes: 1
From: St Petersburg, FL
i had mine all screwy when i put new struts and lowering springs in. i'm not sure if the caster 0's or goes negative with it forward. it depends on the geometry that mazda incorperated. i will check this once i take it in for an alignment.
Reply
Old May 24, 2002 | 12:54 PM
  #28  
inittab's Avatar
Thread Starter
I read your email
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 2,624
Likes: 1
From: NW New Jersey
From this page:
http://www.familycar.com/alignment.htm

If the top of the strut is leaning toward the rear of the car, then the caster is positive, if it's leaning toward the front, it is negative.
Reply
Old May 24, 2002 | 01:30 PM
  #29  
jeremy's Avatar
male stripper
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 3,126
Likes: 1
From: St Petersburg, FL
yes, i know. but who said that the tower is in direct alignment with the hub.
Reply
Old May 24, 2002 | 04:51 PM
  #30  
yayarx7's Avatar
Are you Nucking Futs?
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 1,235
Likes: 0
From: Abilene, TEXAS
Originally posted by inittab


I have yet to find any specs. If you have or find the specs, please PM me or post them here. Thanks!
ummm....Mazda FSM!


as per the 80 FSM....

Caster....RH side....4 degrees 30' (+/- 30')
LH side....4 degrees 0' (+/- 30')
max difference in caster between sides...+/- 40'

Camber....1 deg. 10' (+/- 30')
max diff..........+/- 30'

toe in 0~0.24in
Reply
Old May 24, 2002 | 06:21 PM
  #31  
Pele's Avatar
Right near Malloy
Tenured Member: 25 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (28)
 
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 7,855
Likes: 517
From: Behind a workbench, repairing FC Electronics.
Talking Ha ha! Suckers!

Work at a tire shop or have a friend at one. That's the best place to get your alignment done at.

After hours, a lotta guys do side work. Either then or during a non busy period, I have free range on the alignment rack. Drive on, jack up, clamp the sensors on the wheels, and set the computer. Follow the hand guided instrustions and I have specs, what my car currently reads, what to do to adjust it (Fully illustrated!)

Alignment racks are fun, although there are several cars I hate aligning. Anything made by Mopar with cab foreward design, IE: Chrysler M300, Dodge Intrepid, etc. are a bitch and a half.
Reply
Old May 24, 2002 | 11:38 PM
  #32  
peejay's Avatar
Old [Sch|F]ool
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 12,865
Likes: 571
From: Cleveland, Ohio, USA
OH GOD.... WHY in the world did Chrysler do that? The 1st-gen models have about 4 different things making them a pain to adjust (inaccessible, rust up easily, dual locknut adjuster, coarse threads so it's VERY touchy) and the 2nd-gen models, while tons more nicerful to adjust, they love to rust up and break the adjuster as soon as you touch it.

I had free rein over the alignment racks... It ruled. I'd put my car up there and quantify the relationship between ride height and camber on my cars, try different settings, etc.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
sukimoto
Rotary Car Performance
3
Oct 26, 2015 02:37 PM
LongDuck
1st Generation Specific (1979-1985)
12
Oct 7, 2015 08:12 PM
Postman09
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
0
Sep 29, 2015 11:23 AM
rotor_veux
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
3
Sep 28, 2015 09:25 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:13 PM.