how do igniters work?
#27
Hunting Skylines
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Posts: 3,431
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Originally posted by Wankelguy
Look up "DC Amplifier".
But yes, I am frequently "off base", nyuk nyuk.
Look up "DC Amplifier".
But yes, I am frequently "off base", nyuk nyuk.
This however is utter crap (either that or you didn't explain yourself very well):
The voltage spike produced by the action of the rotor passing through the magnetic field in the distributor is too small to trigger the coil(s) unless it is amplified by the ignitor, which is also properly referred to as an amplifier. That's about it, there's no complex engine control circuitry inside. Jeff 20B had it right. Oh, and there is no contact between the parts of the pickup in the distributor.
#28
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Central New York
Posts: 686
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I think what he's saying is that a transistor, by definition, is an amplifier.
However, Wankelguy, it would seem that in this situation only the switching property is being used.
Although, if that were the case, it could explain the price of igniters. (I'm not sure that a simple electronic switch would make them so expensive)
There's an easy way to find out--- With a Voltmeter =)
Just my .02
However, Wankelguy, it would seem that in this situation only the switching property is being used.
Although, if that were the case, it could explain the price of igniters. (I'm not sure that a simple electronic switch would make them so expensive)
There's an easy way to find out--- With a Voltmeter =)
Just my .02
#29
Hunting Skylines
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Posts: 3,431
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Not all ignitors are expensive. You can get GM and other manufacturers ignition modules that do the same thing and are way cheaper. Unfortunately they only work with the 80 model electronic ignition where the ignitors are mounted remote from the dizzy.
#30
Rotary Enthusiast
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: lol
Posts: 803
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
HAH! I got an 80 dizzy, hahaha!
This first gen forum is becoming more like a second gen forum.... where most people are grumpy... I think the mods hardley check here anymore cause they think were big boys and can solve things ourselves..... I think they may be right...
how 'bout dem' bran muffins?
This first gen forum is becoming more like a second gen forum.... where most people are grumpy... I think the mods hardley check here anymore cause they think were big boys and can solve things ourselves..... I think they may be right...
how 'bout dem' bran muffins?
#32
Originally posted by REVHED
Look, if you're saying there's some sort of amplification of the DC pulse from the pickup to control the transistor then you may be right. I honestly have no idea.
This however is utter crap (either that or you didn't explain yourself very well):
There is no amplification of any "pulse" to control the ignition coil. The only job of the ignitor in relation to the coil is to switch off the primary circuit by interrupting it's current path to ground. That's how any Kettering ignition system works whether it's done by contact points or by electronics.
Look, if you're saying there's some sort of amplification of the DC pulse from the pickup to control the transistor then you may be right. I honestly have no idea.
This however is utter crap (either that or you didn't explain yourself very well):
There is no amplification of any "pulse" to control the ignition coil. The only job of the ignitor in relation to the coil is to switch off the primary circuit by interrupting it's current path to ground. That's how any Kettering ignition system works whether it's done by contact points or by electronics.
#33
Lapping = Fapping
iTrader: (13)
Yeah, what he said.
As far as I can tell, the voltage spike from the pickup can vary in intensity and frequency and all that jazz, but it doesn't affect the output of the ignitor's transistor in a negative way. The only thing that gets worse as RPM rises is the saturation of the coils. They spark less powerfully at higher RPM because there is less time to build up enough... er, juice.
All I know is the ignition stuff I'm spending my hard earned money and time on is still ok at the highest RPM my engines can rev to, so I still sleep well at night.
As far as I can tell, the voltage spike from the pickup can vary in intensity and frequency and all that jazz, but it doesn't affect the output of the ignitor's transistor in a negative way. The only thing that gets worse as RPM rises is the saturation of the coils. They spark less powerfully at higher RPM because there is less time to build up enough... er, juice.
All I know is the ignition stuff I'm spending my hard earned money and time on is still ok at the highest RPM my engines can rev to, so I still sleep well at night.
#34
Hunting Skylines
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Posts: 3,431
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Originally posted by Wankelguy
You're right, I didn't explain myself very well. I have a habit of trying to put things in simple terms for the sake of brevity and comprehension by people who are not electronic technicians (as I am). However, an amplifier is defined as a device which uses a small input to affect a larger change in output, whether it's configured as a simple transistor switch or not. It still has to be "signal biased" so that the transistor turns on when the voltage spike from the pickup is applied to the base as there is a .7V drop between the base and emitter. Hell, I'm not the one who coined the term "amplifier" with regard to the ignitors, anyway, so don't rake me over the coals about my use of that term. 'Nuff said. And the reason that the Mazda ignitors are so expensive is mostly just price gouging. I bought one new from a Mazda dealer (for my '80 Courier) in about 1983 and the thing was over $100 back then, and was still cheaper than the identical unit sold by Ford! FWIW, I've gotten several ignitors from junkyards and never found a bad one yet. You want to pull them off a car that was wrecked as opposed to rusted and neglected as that indicates that the car was at least running when it got munched, therefore the ignitors were probably working properly.
You're right, I didn't explain myself very well. I have a habit of trying to put things in simple terms for the sake of brevity and comprehension by people who are not electronic technicians (as I am). However, an amplifier is defined as a device which uses a small input to affect a larger change in output, whether it's configured as a simple transistor switch or not. It still has to be "signal biased" so that the transistor turns on when the voltage spike from the pickup is applied to the base as there is a .7V drop between the base and emitter. Hell, I'm not the one who coined the term "amplifier" with regard to the ignitors, anyway, so don't rake me over the coals about my use of that term. 'Nuff said. And the reason that the Mazda ignitors are so expensive is mostly just price gouging. I bought one new from a Mazda dealer (for my '80 Courier) in about 1983 and the thing was over $100 back then, and was still cheaper than the identical unit sold by Ford! FWIW, I've gotten several ignitors from junkyards and never found a bad one yet. You want to pull them off a car that was wrecked as opposed to rusted and neglected as that indicates that the car was at least running when it got munched, therefore the ignitors were probably working properly.
#35
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Posts: 307
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Interesting thread. Just wanted to mention this (repeating, to an extent, what Wankleguy said)...
But...there is amplification involved. If the only job of the ignitor was to switch off the current to the primary circuit, they could have used a relay. Problem is, the relay coil could not be triggered by the very small induced current from the reluctor (the pulse). A transistor can sense the small current from the reluctor and react by varying a larger current: by any definition, that's amplification. Just like an audio amplifier, but without the tunes...
But I do see your point, in that the ignitor is simply triggered by the distributor signal and not "amplifying" the ignition coil signal (current) in any way. The turns ratio in the coil does that, as you've said.
In the end, I'd say both you and Wankleguy (and Jeff20B) are right. The ignitor performs both functions: amplification and switching.
It's off topic, but I want your car. Badly. Mind if I drop by one day and have a drive?
-John.
Originally posted by REVHED
This however is utter crap (either that or you didn't explain yourself very well):
There is no amplification of any "pulse" to control the ignition coil. The only job of the ignitor in relation to the coil is to switch off the primary circuit by interrupting it's current path to ground. That's how any Kettering ignition system works whether it's done by contact points or by electronics.
This however is utter crap (either that or you didn't explain yourself very well):
There is no amplification of any "pulse" to control the ignition coil. The only job of the ignitor in relation to the coil is to switch off the primary circuit by interrupting it's current path to ground. That's how any Kettering ignition system works whether it's done by contact points or by electronics.
But I do see your point, in that the ignitor is simply triggered by the distributor signal and not "amplifying" the ignition coil signal (current) in any way. The turns ratio in the coil does that, as you've said.
In the end, I'd say both you and Wankleguy (and Jeff20B) are right. The ignitor performs both functions: amplification and switching.
It's off topic, but I want your car. Badly. Mind if I drop by one day and have a drive?
-John.
#36
Hunting Skylines
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Posts: 3,431
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Originally posted by FJ
Interesting thread. Just wanted to mention this (repeating, to an extent, what Wankleguy said)...
But...there is amplification involved. If the only job of the ignitor was to switch off the current to the primary circuit, they could have used a relay. Problem is, the relay coil could not be triggered by the very small induced current from the reluctor (the pulse). A transistor can sense the small current from the reluctor and react by varying a larger current: by any definition, that's amplification. Just like an audio amplifier, but without the tunes...
But I do see your point, in that the ignitor is simply triggered by the distributor signal and not "amplifying" the ignition coil signal (current) in any way. The turns ratio in the coil does that, as you've said.
In the end, I'd say both you and Wankleguy (and Jeff20B) are right. The ignitor performs both functions: amplification and switching.
It's off topic, but I want your car. Badly. Mind if I drop by one day and have a drive?
-John.
Interesting thread. Just wanted to mention this (repeating, to an extent, what Wankleguy said)...
But...there is amplification involved. If the only job of the ignitor was to switch off the current to the primary circuit, they could have used a relay. Problem is, the relay coil could not be triggered by the very small induced current from the reluctor (the pulse). A transistor can sense the small current from the reluctor and react by varying a larger current: by any definition, that's amplification. Just like an audio amplifier, but without the tunes...
But I do see your point, in that the ignitor is simply triggered by the distributor signal and not "amplifying" the ignition coil signal (current) in any way. The turns ratio in the coil does that, as you've said.
In the end, I'd say both you and Wankleguy (and Jeff20B) are right. The ignitor performs both functions: amplification and switching.
It's off topic, but I want your car. Badly. Mind if I drop by one day and have a drive?
-John.
If you wanna have a drive you're welcome to come over and visit any time.
#37
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Posts: 307
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by REVHED
Yeah, I understand what you guys are saying. I didn't really think of it in the sense of amplification because it's indirect. As for using a relay, that would impossible anyway because it wouldn't be able to perform fast enough.
Yeah, I understand what you guys are saying. I didn't really think of it in the sense of amplification because it's indirect. As for using a relay, that would impossible anyway because it wouldn't be able to perform fast enough.
If you wanna have a drive you're welcome to come over and visit any time.
-John.
Last edited by FJ; 07-11-03 at 07:35 PM.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post