1st Generation Specific (1979-1985) 1979-1985 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections

FC radiator in an SA/FB

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 28, 2022 | 06:18 AM
  #1  
fbse7en's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 308
Likes: 4
From: WA state
FC radiator in an SA/FB

Coulda sworn I'd once seen an SA/FB that had used an FC radiator...Looked like it fit fairly well/OEM-ish, they'd removed the black panel that closes off that opening in front of OEM rad. The top of the FC rad was then attached to where the front edge of that black panel was... Anyone else seen this done it? Does it fit as easily as my memory seems to indicate?
Reply
Old Dec 28, 2022 | 08:14 AM
  #2  
KansasCityREPU's Avatar
Out In the Barn
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 6,704
Likes: 1,250
From: KC
You can make a FC rad work, but it's not a direct fit and does not have all the same sensor locations available.
Reply
Old Dec 28, 2022 | 08:46 AM
  #3  
j9fd3s's Avatar
Moderator
Community Builder
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 31,833
Likes: 3,232
From: https://www2.mazda.com/en/100th/
most of the ones ive seen, they slant the radiator forward, like it would be in the FC

i must have a pic, but can't find one
Reply
Old Dec 28, 2022 | 08:52 AM
  #4  
peejay's Avatar
Old [Sch|F]ool
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 12,862
Likes: 568
From: Cleveland, Ohio, USA
It's the same core size as '83-85, so you do a lot of work for no gain.
Reply
Old Dec 28, 2022 | 01:26 PM
  #5  
fbse7en's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 308
Likes: 4
From: WA state
Slanting forward is what I meant by attaching to that front edge. IIRC, FC radiators are taller and thinner than the OEM SA/FB, which equals better cooling. Multi-row are less efficient, the heat is pushed from the front row into rows behind it, decreasing the efficiency of the rad. The ideal radiator would be thin, single-core/row and multi-pass.
Reply
Old Dec 28, 2022 | 01:34 PM
  #6  
peejay's Avatar
Old [Sch|F]ool
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 12,862
Likes: 568
From: Cleveland, Ohio, USA
The core size is larger than SA and early S2 but the same area as late S2 and S3. 22 by 19 or something along those lines.

The air moving through the radiator does not pick up much heat, which is why it takes a lot of airflow to pull heat out. Because of this, two, three, and even four row radiators still remove an appreciable amount of heat. The air isn't going from ambient to 190F after a single row.

NO to multi pass radiators! They pose a fairly significant flow restriction. Every time I have had to use one it resulted in overheating. They may technically pull more heat from the coolant, but that is because coolant does not move through them as fast. In a cooling system you want the coolant moving as fast as possible! We don't care about the temperature of the coolant in the lower radiator hose, we care about pulling BTUs from the engine. In an ideal cooling system the coolant will be moving so fast that there is a barely measurable temperature change between inlets and outlets, this requires lots and lots of flow.

Last edited by peejay; Dec 28, 2022 at 01:39 PM.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
graffeedy5
1st Generation Specific (1979-1985)
52
May 18, 2010 08:10 PM
dj55b
Canadian Forum
24
Oct 26, 2006 12:07 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:04 AM.