are fb and fc clutch slave cylinders the same?
#1
Rotary Freak
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Kitchener, Ont. Canada
Posts: 1,901
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
are fb and fc clutch slave cylinders the same?
i just blew out my clutch slave, fluid is squirting out of it when i push the pedal big time, and i've located a used one close to home, but not sure if it will work as it is an fc one. my buddy says they are the same, im just making sure.
Nick
Nick
#4
Lapping = Fapping
iTrader: (13)
Actually, yours is not an FC slave. I noticed on the Mazdatrix website that they are different part numbers. Rather than chance it, I tried your stocker with my '84 master and they worked fine together; an FB matched set . I went back and picked up an FC master and it and that FC slave will go into my MG as a matched set.
This means the thread starter's question is still unanswered. I wonder if trochoid or wacky have ever mixed and matched FB and FC clutch hydralics. Someone here must have.
This means the thread starter's question is still unanswered. I wonder if trochoid or wacky have ever mixed and matched FB and FC clutch hydralics. Someone here must have.
#7
RX for fun
iTrader: (13)
Originally Posted by Jeff20B
I wonder if trochoid or wacky have ever mixed and matched FB and FC clutch hydralics. Someone here must have.
If there is a any difference, then it will be in the push rod. Thats what I would be checking.
Trending Topics
#10
RX for fun
iTrader: (13)
I should have made it clear. There is a difference in the Clutch slave's bore size
Originally Posted by AcidAngel7477
couldent you just switch rods? or is that not possible..? if i think about it the only thing that would go wrong..would be if the actual housing of the slave would only fit the rod that was ment for it..right?
:AA:
:AA:
#11
We're All Fkd..
iTrader: (16)
omg..once again..open your eyes and actually read my post..
here ill make it clear for YOU..
if i think about it the only thing that would go wrong..would be if the actual housing of the slave would only fit the rod that was ment for it..right?
this meaning what you just said..***
:AA:
here ill make it clear for YOU..
if i think about it the only thing that would go wrong..would be if the actual housing of the slave would only fit the rod that was ment for it..right?
this meaning what you just said..***
:AA:
#19
Rotary Freak
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Kitchener, Ont. Canada
Posts: 1,901
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by wackyracer
GSL-SE= 15/16th
Non-SE + 86-91= 3/4.
Non-SE + 86-91= 3/4.
Last edited by nick1; 07-03-06 at 07:46 PM. Reason: missspelled car