1st Generation Specific (1979-1985) 1979-1985 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections

FB aerodynamics at high speed

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-08-03, 02:18 PM
  #51  
HEAVY METAL THUNDER

 
rotary emotions's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Elsenborn, Belgian Eifel
Posts: 3,864
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by dingo
so what you guys are telling me, is that my 1st gen can fly?
Yep, that's what they're saying: drive it at maximum speed and it'll take off!
Old 09-08-03, 05:15 PM
  #52  
Hunting Skylines

 
REVHED's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Posts: 3,431
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
I went over 140mph in my 1st gen. Felt perfectly stable. Lowered suspension, Koni's, urethane bushes, good wheel alignment and rear spoiler.

Someone on these forums has seen 200mph in his turbo 1st gen. Completely stock body, stock steering and modded suspension. Seems pretty stable to me.
Old 09-10-03, 02:33 PM
  #53  
Old [Sch|F]ool

 
peejay's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Cleveland, Ohio, USA
Posts: 12,507
Received 416 Likes on 296 Posts
That would be RICE RACING. Has anyone seen him lately?
Old 09-10-03, 03:13 PM
  #54  
Rotary Freak

 
bliffle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: SF BayArea
Posts: 2,815
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I think that the sloppy recirc-ball steering makes the frontend feel light. I look forward to installing the CP Rack 'n pinion.

B
Old 09-10-03, 04:13 PM
  #55  
I wanta be with the BUC!

 
Cory Simpson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Knoxville, TN
Posts: 2,305
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Someone on these forums has seen 200mph in his turbo 1st gen.

OK, I would have to see that to believe it!
Old 09-10-03, 05:22 PM
  #56  
Full Member

 
Makwana's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Canada, Ont
Posts: 247
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
This thread has alot of good info onit. I like it
Old 09-10-03, 05:23 PM
  #57  
Hunting Skylines

 
REVHED's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Posts: 3,431
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally posted by Cory Simpson
OK, I would have to see that to believe it!
It's not that hard to believe. It just takes some hp (around 500hp in this case), the right gearing, enough rpm and a bloody long stretch of road. Anyway, data-logs don't lie.

Old 09-11-03, 02:51 PM
  #58  
Old [Sch|F]ool

 
peejay's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Cleveland, Ohio, USA
Posts: 12,507
Received 416 Likes on 296 Posts
The recirc-ball steering has ****-all to do with the front end feeling light.

The issue is how much aerodynamic lift there is. Practically all cars have lift, not downforce.

Hmm where is the lift coming from... well, on the ol '80, I've noticed that at speed, the air pressure under the hood was sufficient to bend the rear corners of the hood up a half inch or so. Where's that air pressure coming from? Well, there's a *lotta* air going through the radiator and oil cooler, and it piles up underhood. High pressure under the hood, low pressure above the hood (high speed air, read up on your Bernoulli), hmm that would seem to generate LIFT.

Now, if you want scary feeling, you shoulda tried driving my T-bird. Road hugging weight my ***, that car felt like the front tires were coming off the ground at over 75. I have also been told that the ride height as viewed from outside was markedly higher at speed than at rest. 2nd-gen Camaros have been tested to have over 400lb of lift in the front end at something like 100mph, and those cars had better aerodynamics.

Half the time I think people who whine about stability in the 1st-gen are just too used to playing video games.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
SakeBomb Garage
Vendor Classifieds
5
08-09-18 05:54 PM
Neo
Canadian Forum
8
09-14-15 09:09 AM



Quick Reply: FB aerodynamics at high speed



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:20 AM.