Eville140, running 10's?!
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 4,666
Likes: 2
From: chatsworth,Ca.
[QUOTE
and, I'm going to guess at least 10 or so more lbs with the standard 8.8 brakes and diff.... does this sound right?
Thnks,
-Bern[/QUOTE]
uhh, hell no, its ALOT more than 10 pounds!! that mustang **** is heavy!!
ill look in my weight reduction notes, i weight a bunch of parts and wrote it all down......
and, I'm going to guess at least 10 or so more lbs with the standard 8.8 brakes and diff.... does this sound right?
Thnks,
-Bern[/QUOTE]
uhh, hell no, its ALOT more than 10 pounds!! that mustang **** is heavy!!
ill look in my weight reduction notes, i weight a bunch of parts and wrote it all down......
Rotary Enthusiast
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,414
Likes: 0
From: Southern Cali
Originally Posted by 680RWHP12A
and, I'm going to guess at least 10 or so more lbs with the standard 8.8 brakes and diff.... does this sound right?
Thnks,
-Bern
uhh, hell no, its ALOT more than 10 pounds!! that mustang **** is heavy!!
ill look in my weight reduction notes, i weight a bunch of parts and wrote it all down......
-Bern
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 483
Likes: 44
From: Napier
Using my sore back as a set of weights, I'd estimate the 8.8" being at least 40 pounds heavier than the standard RX assembly. Possibly 50 pounds. The example I have was 100mm wider than the RX before it was narrowed.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
trickster
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
25
Jul 1, 2023 04:40 PM
turbo-minivan
General Rotary Tech Support
69
Feb 4, 2016 12:29 AM
The Shaolin
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
9
Sep 14, 2015 07:50 PM
