1st Generation Specific (1979-1985) 1979-1985 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections

Ethanol - Gas mix

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 27, 2010 | 11:11 PM
  #1  
Father Goose's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
From: Colorado Springs, CO
Ethanol - Gas mix

Ijust recently moved to Colorado and can not find straight 100% gasoline, all of the fuel around here is mixed with enthanol. I remember back when I bought my 7, it came with the recommendation to avoid ethanol. After several months of using the stuff, my 7 is extremely low on power. Willl the fuel have caused this or is the problem elsewhere?

Does anyone else have a problem with ethanol and how do you get around it?
Reply
Old Oct 28, 2010 | 12:39 AM
  #2  
kgray's Avatar
GOT WANKEL?
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,324
Likes: 1
From: Kansas City, MO
Around here, most of the gas has some ethanol in it. My 7 loved 10% ethanol mix. I wouldn't suspect that the ethanol is the cause of your problems. It could, however, expedite the "cleaning" of your fuel lines, so a fuel filter change would be a good place to start.
Reply
Old Oct 28, 2010 | 01:08 AM
  #3  
Box_Man's Avatar
I hate drum brakes
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 638
Likes: 0
From: West Palm Beach, Florida
I hate the stuff, I was getting 24 miles to a gallon on 100% gasoline but on E10 I'm down to 17. I also noticed a huge power difference. On straight gasoline I'd set the timing by advancing it in increments until I heard it barely ping, then I'd back it off a degree or so which would usually put me at ~10 degrees more advanced than what the stock timing marks said to to (If I remember correctly). I can't use this method anymore because the car refuses to ping. I ended up at 20 degrees before I finally decided to quit before I broke something and left it a little north of my special advanced mark that I had made on my front pulley. I did get some power back but the mileage is still crap. I'll inevitably fix all of that with Megasquirt whenever I'm ready.
Reply
Old Oct 28, 2010 | 02:47 AM
  #4  
PercentSevenC's Avatar
I need a new user title
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 2,646
Likes: 1
From: Yaizu, Japan
Man, I wish my gas had MORE ethanol in it. When will an E85 station open up around here?
Reply
Old Oct 28, 2010 | 06:28 AM
  #5  
Keith13b's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 566
Likes: 0
From: Orlando, FL
Originally Posted by Box_Man
I hate the stuff, I was getting 24 miles to a gallon on 100% gasoline but on E10 I'm down to 17. I also noticed a huge power difference. On straight gasoline I'd set the timing by advancing it in increments until I heard it barely ping, then I'd back it off a degree or so which would usually put me at ~10 degrees more advanced than what the stock timing marks said to to (If I remember correctly). I can't use this method anymore because the car refuses to ping. I ended up at 20 degrees before I finally decided to quit before I broke something and left it a little north of my special advanced mark that I had made on my front pulley. I did get some power back but the mileage is still crap. I'll inevitably fix all of that with Megasquirt whenever I'm ready.
I'm with Box Man on this. E10 is is pure **** in my opinion. Fuel economy went to hell with ALL 4 of my cars, power is noticibaly down, idiling is rough with surging; and the list goes on and on. I have nothing good to say about it. Sooner or later I will have to replace the entire fuel supply lines since the Ethanol eats those like candy. My daily driver already had a factory recall to replace the entire fuel system due to issues with ethanol. Too bad Mazda doesn't do that as well! I'm just glad I don't own a boat! Huge problem with those engines!!!!

To top it off, the price of corn has gone though the roof. Used to get 10 ears for a $1 - now it's a $1.20 for one frigin' ear!
Reply
Old Oct 28, 2010 | 10:13 AM
  #6  
kgray's Avatar
GOT WANKEL?
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,324
Likes: 1
From: Kansas City, MO
I had no complaints with fuel economy on 10%. Perhaps a 1-2 mpg drop from 100% gasoline. Then again, I could hit 30mpg+ cruising on the highway.
Reply
Old Oct 28, 2010 | 12:22 PM
  #7  
Directfreak's Avatar
I am a Jeeper Now.
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 9,371
Likes: 4
From: 3OH5
E85 (85% ethanol / 15% Gas) has an octane rating of about 105.
Normally aspirated Rotaries like a LOW octane rating.

This is why the Original Poster has issues with any ethanol being mixed in with
regular gasoline.

E85 will have lower fuel economy than straight gasoline. Between 20-30% lower miles per gallon.
10% ethanol in regular fuel will not affect your stock fuel lines. It's doubtful that even E85 has any effect on stock fuel lines as well.

However, on Turbocharged cars, e85 is even better than race fuel.
Besides the very high octane rating of the gas, the cooling properties of this fuel are almost like methanol.
You dont even need an intercooler! It really makes detonation extremely difficult to do - especially at street power levels.

I personally have been waiting to see what someone with a draw-through turbo system (cheap/easy to install) could see in huge power gains with E85.
Reply
Old Oct 28, 2010 | 04:12 PM
  #8  
Keith13b's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 566
Likes: 0
From: Orlando, FL
Originally Posted by Directfreak
10% ethanol in regular fuel will not affect your stock fuel lines.
Tell that to all the new car manufacturers that are quietly recalling their original aluminum fuel lines. I've had 2 cars from different manufactures replace fuel lines because of the ethanol as a "preventative" (yea right!) measure.

Boat owners are having a nightmare because of it as well. Check out some of the boating fourms. I live in Florida, so boating is a rather big deal, but boaters are going to great lengths to buy non- ethanol fuel. Marinas even advertise it now. They, too, are seeing noticable power loss and lower fuel economy with E10....not to mention pitting of the fuel cells, clogged fuel filters and injectors, etc.. Not to mention the separation if the gas sits too long.

Man this ethanol is an absoulte nightmare. Hopefully in a few years, all cars will be built with ethanol in mind and this will be a moot point. But if you are stuck with a pre-2008 model vehicle - expect some long term problems....This may be great for those running boost, but us N/A guys will be crying our way to the bank to replace part after part a few years down the line.

Somewhere ...someone is making a ton of money at our expense. Watering down gas with ethanol and charging the same ammount of $$. Gotta love capatilism!
Reply
Old Oct 28, 2010 | 04:25 PM
  #9  
DivinDriver's Avatar
1st-Class Engine Janitor
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,376
Likes: 28
From: Chino Hills, CA
Pretty much all street fuel in Cali is 10% or more ethanol now, & has been for years. "Oxygenation," they say. Lower emissions, they say.

More gallons sold = more gas taxes paid, is more my thinking.
Reply
Old Oct 28, 2010 | 06:55 PM
  #10  
trochoid's Avatar
Old Fart Young at Heart
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 15,145
Likes: 8
From: St Joe MO
This is the same kind of crap I heard in the early 70s when ethanol came out. Ethanol, at least here, has a 2 point higher octane rating then regular gas. When I had my 71 Road Runner, a tank of ethanol would clean out the carb and combustion chambers, extending plug life along with a noticeable power increase. On leaded fuel, plugs lasted about 1500 miles before performance dropped off.

Fuel systems have long been designed to handle ethanol. If there is a problem, it's most likely with moisture because ethanol is hydroscopic, it attracts/absorbs water. Why do you think HEET works so well in the winter? In nearly 40 years, I've never once had an issue with the 10% blended fuels.
Reply
Old Oct 28, 2010 | 07:18 PM
  #11  
vipergts_3's Avatar
G0D OF DEATH
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 1,051
Likes: 0
From: Illinois
Originally Posted by trochoid
This is the same kind of crap I heard in the early 70s when ethanol came out. Ethanol, at least here, has a 2 point higher octane rating then regular gas. When I had my 71 Road Runner, a tank of ethanol would clean out the carb and combustion chambers, extending plug life along with a noticeable power increase. On leaded fuel, plugs lasted about 1500 miles before performance dropped off.

Fuel systems have long been designed to handle ethanol. If there is a problem, it's most likely with moisture because ethanol is hydroscopic, it attracts/absorbs water. Why do you think HEET works so well in the winter? In nearly 40 years, I've never once had an issue with the 10% blended fuels.
i agree. the gas is not the "problem" i use 10% in all my rx7's and i have not ever had a problem or a failed gas line.
Reply
Old Oct 28, 2010 | 11:25 PM
  #12  
PercentSevenC's Avatar
I need a new user title
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 2,646
Likes: 1
From: Yaizu, Japan
Originally Posted by Directfreak
However, on Turbocharged cars, e85 is even better than race fuel.
Besides the very high octane rating of the gas, the cooling properties of this fuel are almost like methanol.
You dont even need an intercooler! It really makes detonation extremely difficult to do - especially at street power levels.
Seriously. What people are doing on E85 is nothing short of miraculous, especially for a cheap pump fuel. 800 WHP daily-driven 13B? Sure, why not? There are guys running gasoline-equivalent AFRs of like 13:1 and seeing no detonation at all at 30+ PSI! I gotta get me some of that. And a bigger turbo.
Reply
Old Oct 29, 2010 | 12:24 AM
  #13  
j9fd3s's Avatar
Moderator
Community Builder
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 31,833
Likes: 3,232
From: https://www2.mazda.com/en/100th/
Originally Posted by DivinDriver
Pretty much all street fuel in Cali is 10% or more ethanol now, & has been for years. "Oxygenation," they say. Lower emissions, they say.

More gallons sold = more gas taxes paid, is more my thinking.
its been something like 15 years? i haven't noticed any problems. regular gas will get better mileage, but that's about it
Reply
Old Oct 29, 2010 | 12:38 AM
  #14  
thunkrd's Avatar
i'm a poser
Tenured Member 05 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,919
Likes: 0
From: san leandro, Ca
there's an e85 station on my way to school.. i might put some in my gslse.. not sure what it would do tho
Reply
Old Oct 29, 2010 | 02:09 AM
  #15  
Directfreak's Avatar
I am a Jeeper Now.
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 9,371
Likes: 4
From: 3OH5
You will see no benefit at all. The car has to be tuned for e85 for any advantage.
If you put e85 in a stock GSL-SE it probably wont run right at all, and might not even idle.

Unless your car is boosted, don't bother.
Reply
Old Oct 29, 2010 | 05:16 PM
  #16  
DivinDriver's Avatar
1st-Class Engine Janitor
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,376
Likes: 28
From: Chino Hills, CA
Originally Posted by j9fd3s
its been something like 15 years? i haven't noticed any problems. regular gas will get better mileage, but that's about it
That's pretty much what my point was.
Reply
Old Oct 29, 2010 | 05:30 PM
  #17  
AZRotor's Avatar
Tucson Rotary
Tenured Member 05 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 228
Likes: 0
From: Tucson
In AZ we have been using it for years. Not my preferred but have to deal with it. Problem we have is that we use fuel during the summer months and blended during the winter.
Main issue was with the semi-auto choke mode. Cars would run like crap when the choke pulled off until they reached full operating temp. If we set the car to run right for that 10 minutes then we found mileage went down and driveability suffered. So ended up just telling the client the problem and learn to live with that 5/10 minutes.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
userjh5174
Alternative Fuels
1
Jan 9, 2016 08:49 AM
musker
New Member RX-7 Technical
1
Oct 1, 2015 05:58 PM
rattlehead
New Member RX-7 Technical
2
Sep 25, 2015 10:55 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:50 AM.