1st Generation Specific (1979-1985) 1979-1985 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections

Carbon Fiber Drive Shafts?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 5, 2002 | 10:53 PM
  #26  
Manntis's Avatar
add to cart
Tenured Member: 20 Years
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 4,181
Likes: 0
From: Saskatoon, SK & Montreal, PQ
Originally posted by bwaits


Are you trying to say that the rotational force exerted on a weight glued to a drive shaft is going to be more than hitting a stationary object at 100+ MPH. Get real.
If you are working with carbon you are already measuring epoxy. Would not be that difficult. A monocoque is not a piece a body work.


-billy
I said nothing about rotational force, I said axial balance. BALANCE IS NOT FORCE.

And to compare the balance of a spinning shaft to the deceleration loads of a crumpling form is ridiculous, to say the least.

Read and understand before you turn on your flamethrower or you'll end up burning yourself.

PeeJay - Your suggestion makes sense... I wonder how hard it would be to epoxy the weight inside the shaft? keeping the outside all smooth and showcar gorgeous...
Reply
Old Sep 6, 2002 | 12:23 AM
  #27  
gamble302's Avatar
roadkill hats rock
Tenured Member: 20 Years
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 1,396
Likes: 0
From: Austin, Texas
strong driveshafts are cool.
Reply
Old Sep 6, 2002 | 10:01 AM
  #28  
Re-Speed.com's Avatar
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 2,483
Likes: 1
From: London, Ontario
Originally posted by Manntis


I said nothing about rotational force, I said axial balance. BALANCE IS NOT FORCE.

And to compare the balance of a spinning shaft to the deceleration loads of a crumpling form is ridiculous, to say the least.

Read and understand before you turn on your flamethrower or you'll end up burning yourself.

Dude, no one is trying to flame you. I did read the post. In your first post you questioned the u-joint and flange parts failing as well as how you would affix the weight. I simply stated those could all be machined parts that are glued to the carbon tube.

Then you brought up axial balance. My responses were to the questions about how to use the correct amount of epoxy and the strength of the joints. I did not answer anything towards axial balance. If I were to do this I would not "affix" any weight. I would simply remove small amounts of material on the u-joint part near where it is glued to the carbon tube. You can also remove material to achieve balance.
Reply
Old Sep 6, 2002 | 03:58 PM
  #29  
Hyper4mance2k's Avatar
The Shadetree Project
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (40)
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 7,301
Likes: 3
From: District of Columbia
LOOKS LIKE SOMEONE HAS BEEN PLAYING WAY TOO MUCH GRAN TURISMO!!!! HEY JUST BUY ONE THEY'RE ONLY 1000 CREDITS LOL HHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAAA
Reply
Old Sep 6, 2002 | 05:15 PM
  #30  
jeremy's Avatar
male stripper
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 3,126
Likes: 1
From: St Petersburg, FL
Originally posted by gamble302
strong driveshafts are cool.
thats what happened to my 12a shaft when i drag raced a viper the other day. almost had him but i fried my piston rings too. you still have a booger, man.
Reply
Old Sep 6, 2002 | 05:32 PM
  #31  
357's Avatar
357
Stratoflattener
Tenured Member 20 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 475
Likes: 0
From: Lincoln, NE; Cambridge, MA
Gran Turismo! YEAAAAAAAAAH!!!!!!
Reply
Old Sep 6, 2002 | 05:34 PM
  #32  
357's Avatar
357
Stratoflattener
Tenured Member 20 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 475
Likes: 0
From: Lincoln, NE; Cambridge, MA
Oh, and I think in GT3, they range between 2000 and 4000 depending on the length of the car, and whether its RWD or 4WD
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Snoopy FD
Build Threads
25
Dec 8, 2015 01:45 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:27 AM.