1st Generation Specific (1979-1985) 1979-1985 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections

Can you accurately measure hp at the wheels?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-23-03, 05:38 PM
  #1  
Senior Member

Thread Starter
 
fitzwarryne's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Cloud Nine & Peak of God
Posts: 278
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Can you accurately measure hp at the wheels?

There has been much comment on the significance of dyno results of hp at the wheels, and the different results for different makes of dynos.

I thought it might be interesting to quote Mazdas official position as it relates to that other car the RX-8.


"There is no true way to generate flywheel horsepower from a chassis dynamometer because of frictional losses in the driveline, clutch, transmission, differential and tires. Also, variations in testing procedures will cause highly disparate readings: open/closed hood, high/low humidity, high/low ambient temperature, tire pressure, how tightly the car is tied down, which gear the car is tested in, etc.

In addition, we have determined that, in order to prevent damage to the catalytic converter and the entire driveline, when the PCM determines unusual operating parameters such as excessive slip in the drivetrain from the front to the rear wheels, it causes a rich high-RPM mixture and retardation of the timing. All these items combine to cause apparent considerable horsepower loss.

BACKGROUND:

Horsepower Measurement

There is only one true method for measuring engine horsepower: on an engine dynamometer at constant speed and utilizing variable load.

The engine should use the same intake and exhaust system as in the car. HP results must be corrected to SAE J1349 standards as listed below:

77 degrees Fahrenheit
Sea level
0% humidity
Correction factors must be applied to reference the measurements to SAE J1349 standards. Any correction factor beyond 7% is considered invalid.

Chassis Dynamometers

SAE has produced a technical paper (SAE Technical Paper Series 2002-01-0887) that attempts to address the ongoing debate about inertia dyno horsepower versus OEM net horsepower. You can order a copy by visiting their website at www.sae.org -- we have no intentions of getting mired in the middle of this discussion.

Bottom line: If used properly, chassis dynos are great tools to assist with tuning and modifying vehicles. It is impossible to measure the actual flywheel horsepower because there are simply too many variables.

Other issues that are unique to the RX-8:

The RX-8 uses a very advanced engine management system. Besides precisely controlling the operating parameters of the engine, self-preservation (of both the engine and the catalytic converter) is also considered.

The engine management system continuously monitors all engine functions and adjusts accordingly. For example:

Under heavy load acceleration, the timing is retarded and the fuel mixture richened to reduce the likelihood of pre-ignition or spark knock. If spark knock is encountered, a knock sensor senses the condition and further retards the timing. Gradually timing is advanced and fuel mixture leaned after the load is reduced.

A second reason for fuel enrichment is that when timing is retarded, exhaust temperatures increase; a richer mixture lowers the exhaust temperatures and reduces the chances of damaging the catalytic converter.

In real world driving, this all goes unnoticed to the driver and appears seamless with no disruptions to the performance of the engine. The car encounters a load under acceleration but the load quickly diminishes as the car accelerates in each gear.

Operating on a chassis dynamometer, however, creates a completely different environment. Inertia dynos use a known mass that is accelerated to measure torque at the wheels. This is usually done in one gear under heavy load conditions:

Only the rear wheels are turning while the front tires remain stationary.

On cars equipped with DSC with traction control, the difference in speed between the front and rear wheels is sensed and the power is reduced immediately to compensate for what the car senses as excess wheel spin.

If the DSC is turned off, the traction control is disabled but the brake functions of the DSC are still operational.

If the DSC system is completely disabled, this removes the brake functions from the equation, however it does not fully remove the engine management system functions.

The ABS hydraulic unit/control module (HU/CM), or the DSC HU/CM for cars with DSC, determines vehicle speed by comparing the speed of all four wheels. If two are turning and two are stationary, it will still compute a speed but senses that the car is experiencing excessive wheel spin. To protect against engine or catalyst damage:

The engine management system compares the throttle opening, gear selection (determined by engine speed and road speed) charging efficiency and engine coolant temperature to determine the driving condition.

Since the car is under heavy load, in a tall gear (testing is usually performed in third or fourth gear), with a wide throttle position angle (wide open), spark timing is reduced and the fuel mixture is richened to reduce the occurrence of spark knock and to reduce catalytic converter temperatures. "

END OF QUOTE

While there is some merit in rwhp figures, I think its important to remember the limitations when commenting on minor differences in dyno results
Old 12-23-03, 07:19 PM
  #2  
Boing

 
Cloud's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Bellevue
Posts: 347
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I love carbs.
Old 12-23-03, 08:00 PM
  #3  
Full Member

 
Narcisse91's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 226
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
That's more or less true. The only thing chassis dynos are good for is comparing one car to itself, and even then, run to run can vary a lot.

Of course, HP is a completely meaningless number in the first place, so what difference does it make whether it's accurate or not?
Old 12-23-03, 11:48 PM
  #4  
Senior Member

 
rotarydankus again's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: hutchison ks
Posts: 260
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
i can tell you this the last 6 runs ive done on my car are spreadover two days and were within 2 horse of each other, its the only way toget horsepower to weight ratio, and the only way to get an accurate percar reading and accounting for differences in driveline losses in similiar vehicles. our dyno is the same one used by the winston cup teams. they dyno them on engine dyno and chassis dyno to calculate to the gnats *** the frictional drive line losses. i believe its the most accurate way to get a true to the ground reading. that articule waas mazda's attempt to dodge the bullet for lowering the output of the auto cars by tuning them to be more tame instead of owning up to the trans/converter durability issue , and then not tellin everybody about it , for the second time, with a rotary powered car. huummmmm,
Old 12-24-03, 01:30 AM
  #5  
"By the beard of Zeus!"

 
FuLLsMoKe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Huntsville, Alabama / Atlanta, Georgia
Posts: 867
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by Cloud
I love carbs.


Originally posted by rotarydankus again
that articule waas mazda's attempt to dodge the bullet for lowering the output of the auto cars by tuning them to be more tame instead of owning up to the trans/converter durability issue , and then not tellin everybody about it , for the second time, with a rotary powered car. huummmmm,
Mazda was dodging the bullet but not because of the auto version of the rx8--both the auto and manual versions have less HP than originally rated (because of emission standards here in the US when they were shipped overseas). I heard that Mazda is giving 5000 worth of service to people now...

FS

Last edited by FuLLsMoKe; 12-24-03 at 01:36 AM.




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:00 AM.