1st Generation Specific (1979-1985) 1979-1985 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections

12a TBI Roll Call

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 1, 2006 | 04:28 PM
  #26  
rxtasy3's Avatar
Moderator
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 9,579
Likes: 290
From: Spartanburg, SC
that's nice. just the kind of setup i've been considering.
Reply
Old Nov 12, 2006 | 04:08 PM
  #27  
SPERRYsan's Avatar
OHhh yea
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 213
Likes: 0
From: Merica
autonomics are alright
not very good for turbo setup but works pretty good
if you think fi is easier you are mistaken
sure you get alot more thinkgs to change then two screws and jets
but you have to learn a whole lot to find out what they all do
learning about a carb first would be alot easier in my opinion
but since i love the challenge I went tbi
before

after
Reply
Old Nov 12, 2006 | 11:16 PM
  #28  
steve84GS TII's Avatar
FB+FC=F-ME
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 3,353
Likes: 5
From: Rohnert Park CA
On the subject of turbos and TBI,it has been done by several Chevy guys.

However,the Rochester TBI units have a propensity for wearing their throttle shaft bushings.Ive replaced mine once already. Adding boost will only make things worse,since the pressure will place more load on the throttle shafts.Owners of boosted TBI engines report frequent failure of the bushings,boost leaks around the shafts,and constant fuel leakage onto the intake manifold and TBI outer body.
Reply
Old Nov 13, 2006 | 10:05 AM
  #29  
no_name's Avatar
Duct-tape fixes all
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,000
Likes: 0
From: Toronto, Canada
I agree with the Chev V-6 option. I work in a scrap yard, and we have alot of Chev V-6 with TBI. All you need to do is use the hardware (the actualy throttle body), and run a megasquirt computer. That way you will not have to mess around with O2 sensors. In order to make it all fit you will have to make an adapter plate to mount the throttle boddy to the Carb Spacer, or base. The only reason one might want to keep the Carb Spacer is to try and keep the vacume advance. As for a MAP sesnor, I supose you could also use teh Chev unit. That I am not sure about. I am also unsure how the OMP's will operate with out a carb? (somone please fill me on that). Either way it is not a major issue, just run a premix and everything is good.
Reply
Old Nov 13, 2006 | 11:21 AM
  #30  
MattG's Avatar
Thread Starter
MattG FTW!!!!!
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 2,733
Likes: 1
From: South Windsor, CT
Yes, the more I looked into TBI the more I decided I likes the carb alot better. At the time of this thread I couldnt find a single carb that would work, and I was just fed up with them.

I now have my sterling carb, my wideband unit and my jets, and im in the process of tuning.
Reply
Old Nov 13, 2006 | 12:01 PM
  #31  
Naegleria_Fowleri's Avatar
Terrified.
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 3,463
Likes: 1
From: Muncie, IN
Originally Posted by MattG
Yes, the more I looked into TBI the more I decided I likes the carb alot better. At the time of this thread I couldnt find a single carb that would work, and I was just fed up with them.

I now have my sterling carb, my wideband unit and my jets, and im in the process of tuning.
That's good to hear, Matty. I'm glad all that worked out for you.
Reply
Old Nov 13, 2006 | 08:35 PM
  #32  
steve84GS TII's Avatar
FB+FC=F-ME
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 3,353
Likes: 5
From: Rohnert Park CA
TBI is a great entry level type of EFI since its simple and reliable.....but it does have its place.
On a Chevy V engine,or a hotrod or classic....its a perfect choice.Gives you modern driveability but retains the old school look.Its also a great way to upgrade a daily driven vehicle that was once carbed.(Like V-8 midsized cars and Jeeps/trucks)

For a custom job,like adapting it to a rotary,its more a problem.Mainly because its not designed for that type of engine,and few/non have done it before.So your kinda treading into uncharted waters with that swap.
Yes,with time and money,you could likely sort it out and get the right sensors and values inputed into the ECU.But with plenty of port injection systems and proven,performance carbs already on the market that bolt right up to the rotary,choosing TBI seems like a step backwards.
Reply
Old Nov 14, 2006 | 08:32 PM
  #33  
no_name's Avatar
Duct-tape fixes all
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,000
Likes: 0
From: Toronto, Canada
the GSL-SE is TBI. Also with a stanalone ECU and bigger injectors, you will be able to get more hp, more reliably, with better fuel economy with a TBI system then with a carb. TBI was the first step, but it is still better then 98% of carbs out their, that is why they made the change.
Reply
Old Nov 15, 2006 | 01:55 PM
  #34  
Yark79's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 287
Likes: 0
From: Knoxville, Tennessee
I would like to go FI at some point, but once I get a daily, I would guess the benefits of going FI would not make up for the cost, eventhough I think it would be really cool. With unlimited funds I think I would go in this direction: http://www.hitman.hm/ported.htm
Maybe one day I still will.(?)
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
heywier427
Naturally Aspirated Performance Forum
2
Sep 11, 2015 04:49 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:18 PM.