Differences between carbs from different years - RX7Club.com - Mazda RX7 Forum

1st Gen General Discussion The place for non-technical discussion about 1st Gen RX-7s or if there's no better place for your topic

Differences between carbs from different years


Old 08-13-17, 12:01 AM
Can Post Only in New Member Section
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: IL, USA
Posts: 2
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Differences between carbs from different years

I'm the new owner of a neglected '80 SA and an '84 GS. I noticed that the carbs (and the spare carb that was sitting in the trunk) are slightly different. What changes were made to the carbs during this time?
pranjalv is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 08-13-17, 03:25 AM

iTrader: (2)
7aull's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Arizona
Posts: 3,038
Thanked 13 Times in 11 Posts
I won't even try to answer the question, but it would not surprise me that there is some here who actually can answer correctly.
With evolving emissions, etc thru the models years, in addition to different versions for auto trannys AND CA-spec cars, I think I can safely say there are a L-O-T of differences
that would be a challenge to list. Likewise I am sure numerous parts interchange, since no manufacture wants to scratch-build when they'd rather pull it off the shelf.
As you know, carbs are made up of a LOT of pieces. I am not sure how one would begin to figure out which are similar between years, and those that are different. Arguably one could go thru the parts manuals and look for matching part numbers....
big job tho...

Sorry no clear answer -

Stu Aull
7aull is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 08-14-17, 08:13 AM
Waffles - hmmm good
iTrader: (1)
t_g_farrell's Avatar
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Huntersville, N.C.
Posts: 7,391
Thanked 50 Times in 48 Posts
There are some very important differences between model years of carbs. You can't just mix and match major carb components like the main throttle body and the lower throttle body due to some of these differences. Best advice is to keep the same year carb parts together.

BTW, the SA carb and intake are considered superior to the later FB ones due to flow characteristics.

Jeff20B can fill you in on all the subtle changes over the years. Just search for his threads and start reading if you want an education.
t_g_farrell is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 08-14-17, 12:12 PM
Lapping = Fapping
iTrader: (12)
Jeff20B's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Near Seattle
Posts: 15,459
Thanked 25 Times in 23 Posts
Um, the SA tops kinda suck actually. And I don't mean that in a good way. They mess up the a/f curve due to limited shrouding of the air bleeds and aren't capable of handling boost nicely like the FB tops can. Thus I've retrofitted FB tops on my SA carbs and they perform better.

The SA intake manifold has better primary runners but worse secondary runners compared to the FB version. The FB version is opposite with crappy primaries but better secondaries. Pick your poison.

A little bit of runner work can be performed on either choice, but you have to be careful. Never port match a manifold to your engine. This kills the anti-reversion lip which you need to keep for these engines to perform at their best.
Jeff20B is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Jeff20B For This Useful Post:
pranjalv (08-14-17)
Old 08-14-17, 01:34 PM
Can Post Only in New Member Section
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: IL, USA
Posts: 2
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks - I'll experiment with these and see what I can do, especially if i end up adding boost
pranjalv is offline  
Reply With Quote

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us Archive Advertising Cookie Policy Privacy Statement Terms of Service

We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.
  • Ask a Question
    Get answers from community experts
Question Title:
Your question will be posted in: