Mustang Dyno on my RX7
Mustang Dyno on my RX7
I ran the dyno over the weekend and came out with dissapointment number. I attached dyno sheet #1 is me(Blowzilla; GT40 garrett) and #2 is greddy T78. I don't know why so low power!!
It has new electric harness, all the power is connected right. Cleaned the spark plugs, and It has HKS twin power(for rotory only).
It has new electric harness, all the power is connected right. Cleaned the spark plugs, and It has HKS twin power(for rotory only).
Last edited by TTBullet; Aug 21, 2006 at 09:26 AM.
Host it here http://imageshack.us/
Don't feel bad about the dyno results. My FD dyno'd 360rwhp on Ralph Friends mustang dyno. It ran a 12.2@122 on real street tires. Alot of people think that its closer to 400rwhp....but just remember, dyno numbers mean next to nothing without times to back them up. my .02. CJ
Trending Topics
did you get tuned at bpr?
i got my T61 tuned there with very low numbers (340whp). ran a lot of different cars with great results. probably putting down closer to 400whp. ran a tt fd with every bolt on, said his car dynoed 350 and i put bus lenghts on him
take it to the track, see what it does
i just got some dr's and i put in a spec clutch this weekend. should be going to the track sometime soon
i got my T61 tuned there with very low numbers (340whp). ran a lot of different cars with great results. probably putting down closer to 400whp. ran a tt fd with every bolt on, said his car dynoed 350 and i put bus lenghts on him
take it to the track, see what it does
i just got some dr's and i put in a spec clutch this weekend. should be going to the track sometime soon
Originally Posted by pp13bnos
Don't feel bad about the dyno results. My FD dyno'd 360rwhp on Ralph Friends mustang dyno. It ran a 12.2@122 on real street tires. Alot of people think that its closer to 400rwhp....but just remember, dyno numbers mean next to nothing without times to back them up. my .02. CJ
~J
Originally Posted by RETed
Although I've heard some MD owners will claims up to 10% and more difference, I've found that most will have a differential of about 7% from MD to DynoJet.
-Ted
-Ted
I read this on another site...
I spoke with the Mustang Dynamometer operator/tuner, and he said the conversion is 12% (he says it may be more like 15%) between the Mustang and the DynoJet."
"The difference between the Mustang Dynamometer and the DynoJet is ~12%, with the DynoJet reading higher.
As an aside, the dyno operator said that he can adjust the MD to read the same as the DynoJet, but then when you run in the 1/4, the trap speed will not match up with the HP that is indicated by the dyno. He feels strongly that the MD is a more accurate indicator of "real HP".
Originally Posted by internal comsucktion engi
haha youre right....my boss' fd made 313rwhp at rotary performance and ran a 12.10@113 on 245/50/16 kumho street tires! most people find this hard to believe but thats because most people cant drive!
~J
~J
Actually its true...I hate him for that.Video shakes at the finish.I finally hit 1.79 60ft on Sumitomos HTZ. 103 MPH 1/4 with 320 at the wheels on the old motor.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
stickmantijuana
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
5
Jan 11, 2016 04:08 PM
stickmantijuana
Single Turbo RX-7's
0
Aug 21, 2015 08:35 PM





