2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.

S5 J-Spec TII Primary Fuel Rail

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 14, 2003 | 04:22 PM
  #1  
silverrotor's Avatar
Thread Starter
Moderator
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 7,592
Likes: 5
From: Toronto, Corporate Canada
S5 J-Spec TII Primary Fuel Rail

The Primary Fuel Rail to my s5 J-Spec doesn't have a vacuum nipple running off It. How does It compensate for the loss of the air line that our version has?
Reply
Old Nov 14, 2003 | 05:48 PM
  #2  
incendui's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 20 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 297
Likes: 0
From: Longmont, Co
Hmm, I have an s5 jspec engine also, and I'm fairly certain theres a vacuum nipple on the fuel rail. Sure this is a stock fuel rail?
Reply
Old Nov 14, 2003 | 06:12 PM
  #3  
silverrotor's Avatar
Thread Starter
Moderator
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 7,592
Likes: 5
From: Toronto, Corporate Canada
It better be. There Is no vacuum nipple at the Primary Fuel Rail.
Reply
Old Nov 14, 2003 | 06:18 PM
  #4  
niner's Avatar
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 625
Likes: 0
From: charlotte
the pressure regulator and vacuum fitting is on the secondary fuel rail. the one that is on the lower intake manifold.

the primary rail is the one that is on the center side plate. it has the pulsation dampner on it. looks kinda like a fpr, but no vacuum to it
Reply
Old Nov 14, 2003 | 06:31 PM
  #5  
NZConvertible's Avatar
I'm a boost creep...
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 15,608
Likes: 8
From: Auckland, New Zealand
Fuel rails have no vac nipples. The FRP has a vac nipple.

On US engines the FPR is on the secondary rail, on Japanese engines the FPR is on the primary rail.

Silver, are you saying neither rail has a FPR fitted?
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2003 | 03:21 AM
  #6  
silverrotor's Avatar
Thread Starter
Moderator
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 7,592
Likes: 5
From: Toronto, Corporate Canada
Originally posted by niner
the pressure regulator and vacuum fitting is on the secondary fuel rail. the one that is on the lower intake manifold.

the primary rail is the one that is on the center side plate. it has the pulsation dampner on it. looks kinda like a fpr, but no vacuum to it
Absolutely correct...this Is a regurgitation of the US TII version. In my case, the secondary Fuel Rail Is exactly as you described aswell as the Primary Fuel Rail. Except the Pulsation Damper does not have a vacuum nipple coming off It as the US version. So back to square one.

Originally posted by NZ Convertible

Fuel rails have no vac nipples. The FRP has a vac nipple.

On US engines the FPR is on the secondary rail, on Japanese engines the FPR is on the primary rail.

Silver, are you saying neither rail has a FPR fitted?
You'll have to excuse my jargon...It's abit off on account of adjusting my Idle Fuel Maps resulting in major Inhalation of raw fuel. I still have a headache. A real bugger adjusting Idle/fuel on a freshly rebuilt BIG streetported Motor on an EMS.

What I'd like to know Is why Is the J-Spec (s5 - not sure about the s4) not have a vacuum nipple at the Pulsation Damper and how does It compensate for the lack of It? I have one for the FPR.
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2003 | 07:43 PM
  #7  
silverrotor's Avatar
Thread Starter
Moderator
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 7,592
Likes: 5
From: Toronto, Corporate Canada
I'm convinced I'm the only one experiencing this unique phenomenon.
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2003 | 09:43 PM
  #8  
I wish I was driving!
Tenured Member 20 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 5,241
Likes: 84
From: BC, Canada
NONE of the pulsation dampners have a vacuum line.
???

And FPR has a vacuum line, since it requires it to make normal fuel adjustments as manifold pressure changes. There is no need for a PD to have a vacuum line.
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2003 | 10:14 PM
  #9  
NZConvertible's Avatar
I'm a boost creep...
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 15,608
Likes: 8
From: Auckland, New Zealand
What he said.
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2003 | 11:26 PM
  #10  
silverrotor's Avatar
Thread Starter
Moderator
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 7,592
Likes: 5
From: Toronto, Corporate Canada
Than wtf does the Manual show a nipple at the PD???
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2003 | 11:38 PM
  #11  
NZConvertible's Avatar
I'm a boost creep...
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 15,608
Likes: 8
From: Auckland, New Zealand
It doesn't. Look closely and you'll see that's a line passing behind the PD in the drawing. It doesn't connect to it. That's actually the FPR line going from the manifold to the solenoid.
Reply
Old Nov 17, 2003 | 05:34 AM
  #12  
silverrotor's Avatar
Thread Starter
Moderator
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 7,592
Likes: 5
From: Toronto, Corporate Canada


Well. I'll be damned...looking closely reveals that you are correct and this was a waste of time on my part. It passes behind It rather than off It...so much for observancy.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
astrum
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
24
Nov 15, 2017 08:44 AM
Skeese
Adaptronic Engine Mgmt - AUS
65
Mar 28, 2017 03:30 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:33 AM.