3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002) 1993-2002 Discussion including performance modifications and Technical Support Sections.
Sponsored by:

Engine bay - do these belong here??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-08-07, 12:02 AM
  #1  
Feed me fake Feed

Thread Starter
iTrader: (6)
 
RE-Mamamia's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: SoCal
Posts: 723
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 1 Post
Engine bay - do these belong here??

Just got the car and have a few questions about the engine. I'll let the photos do the talking.

1.


^^^ is there suppose to be a check valve to the stock boost controller?


2.


^^^ I am not sure why the BOV is mounted there, but is it installed correctly?

3.


^^^ What's that?

Thanks for your help.
Old 03-08-07, 12:06 AM
  #2  
Full Member

 
Mybaby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Great Neck, NY
Posts: 225
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
#3

That looks like a siren mounted upside down for an aftermarket alarm.
good luck...
Old 03-08-07, 02:15 AM
  #3  
Lives on the Forum

 
rynberg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: San Lorenzo, California
Posts: 14,716
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
1. Yes, that's a filter to protect the MAP sensor (not boost controller).
2. Never seen that one before....and no, the BOV is completely useless hooked up like that. It needs to be hooked up before the throttle body. And you should probably address your poor throttle cable too.
3. Mybaby is probably right on that one.
Old 03-08-07, 07:37 AM
  #4  
RX7 lover

 
BobfisH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 1,160
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
1. Yes, its not a check valve, and thats your MAP sensor.

2. you need to see where the large pipe from the BOV is going to. If you get a noise when your on boost and you lift off and no noise when your in vacuum and lift off, chances are its connected right. The small pipe is deffo connected in the right place, the large one icannot see from the photo.

3. Its your alarm!
Old 03-08-07, 07:43 AM
  #5  
development

 
dubulup's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Lafayette, LA
Posts: 5,714
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by rynberg
2. Never seen that one before....and no, the BOV is completely useless hooked up like that. It needs to be hooked up before the throttle body.

everything looks okay to me.
Old 03-08-07, 08:04 AM
  #6  
RX7 lover

 
BobfisH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 1,160
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Originally Posted by dubulup

everything looks okay to me.
My thoughts too, he said it needed to be connected before the TB so i figured he was talking about the inlet rather than the VAC line- you cant see where the inlet is connected in the pic.
Old 03-08-07, 09:11 AM
  #7  
DGRR 2017 4/26-4/30, 2017

iTrader: (13)
 
Herblenny's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Alabama
Posts: 13,597
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Everything looks A OK!
Old 03-08-07, 10:33 AM
  #8  
Feed me fake Feed

Thread Starter
iTrader: (6)
 
RE-Mamamia's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: SoCal
Posts: 723
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 1 Post
thanks for the feedback!
Old 03-08-07, 11:42 AM
  #9  
Norcal RX7 Pimp

iTrader: (6)
 
rx7what's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Sonora, CA.
Posts: 1,464
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by dubulup

everything looks okay to me.

My thoughts as well. I would say at least 9 out of 10 cars use that nipple for the blow off.
Old 03-08-07, 11:47 AM
  #10  
Lives on the Forum

 
rynberg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: San Lorenzo, California
Posts: 14,716
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
You guys are right of course, that's what I get for surfing when I am dead tired....assuming the inlet hose to the BOV is from the y-pipe, the BOV is fine.
Old 03-08-07, 11:55 AM
  #11  
OooooohWeeeee

iTrader: (3)
 
Compilez's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Kennesaw, GA
Posts: 724
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by rynberg
3. Mybaby is probably right on that one.
hehe, not realizing 'Mybaby' was WHO you were talkin about had me scratchin my head for a sec. .. ok... back on topic
Old 03-08-07, 12:04 PM
  #12  
Banzai Racing

 
BlueTII's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Indiana
Posts: 2,632
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
The filter to the map sensor is actually installed backwards, the arrow should be pointing away from the MAP sensor
Old 03-08-07, 12:24 PM
  #13  
Feed me fake Feed

Thread Starter
iTrader: (6)
 
RE-Mamamia's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: SoCal
Posts: 723
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 1 Post
BlueTII - since you are a Rotary Engine Specialist, I will flip the filter tonight. Thanks for catching this for me...does it hurt the car in anyway with the filter installed backwards?
Old 03-08-07, 12:45 PM
  #14  
Mr. Links

iTrader: (1)
 
Mahjik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 27,595
Received 40 Likes on 26 Posts
Originally Posted by RE-Mamamia
does it hurt the car in anyway with the filter installed backwards?
Your MAP sensor is now contaminated and needs to be replaced... Just kidding.

I've seen them on backwards on a lot of cars. There are several theories as to it's real purpose, but all filters are built with a specific filter direction. Going the opposite direction than intended decreased the filter efficiency (just like a home HVAC filter). However, I doubt there was any harm done as I have yet to see a MAP sensor failure be directly linked to improper filter installation.
Old 03-08-07, 12:45 PM
  #15  
DGRR 2017 4/26-4/30, 2017

iTrader: (13)
 
Herblenny's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Alabama
Posts: 13,597
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by BlueTII
The filter to the map sensor is actually installed backwards, the arrow should be pointing away from the MAP sensor
Does it really make any difference?? If so, i didn't know that.. I just thought those thing to be 2 way valve/filter to absorb moisture.

Nevermind... I just read Mahjik's post..
Old 03-08-07, 01:17 PM
  #16  
Senior Member

iTrader: (4)
 
ranchan02's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Chicago
Posts: 516
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Stupid question, but is it okay to run the MAP hose w/o the filter? Currently I dont have a filter on that hose the MAP is on.
Old 03-08-07, 01:31 PM
  #17  
DGRR 2017 4/26-4/30, 2017

iTrader: (13)
 
Herblenny's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Alabama
Posts: 13,597
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by ranchan02
Stupid question, but is it okay to run the MAP hose w/o the filter? Currently I dont have a filter on that hose the MAP is on.
I run it without filter for approximately 2 years now... but people would say you should.
Old 03-08-07, 07:05 PM
  #18  
Senior Member

iTrader: (1)
 
imluvinit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: DE
Posts: 451
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
yes you should however i am also guilty of not having one.....
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Th0m4s
Build Threads
25
02-26-19 02:04 AM
stickmantijuana
Microtech
30
04-23-16 06:37 PM
mazdaverx713b
Build Threads
48
04-21-16 06:45 AM
immanuel__7
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
89
09-05-15 10:23 AM



Quick Reply: Engine bay - do these belong here??



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:16 PM.