3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002) 1993-2002 Discussion including performance modifications and Technical Support Sections.
Sponsored by:

Is a check valve needed to go between the MAP sensor and UIM?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-27-04, 01:11 PM
  #1  
Rotary Freak

Thread Starter
 
c00lduke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Overland Park, KS
Posts: 2,360
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Is a check valve needed to go between the MAP sensor and UIM?

I havent been running one there for a while and i was told to put the fuel pulsation dampener there but the fpd is huge. In vacuum diagrams that I've looked at it as tophat check valve thing. I would just go put a check valve there but then the sensor wouldn't be able to sense either negitive or positive depending on which way i put it. So does anyone know what needs to go there and so forth.

Thanks
~Luke
Old 03-27-04, 01:30 PM
  #2  
Full Member

 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Tucson
Posts: 241
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Its actually a small air cleaner element to keep particles out.

Your right, if you put a check valve inline, there would be no pressure difference to regulate.
Old 03-27-04, 01:43 PM
  #3  
Rotary Freak

Thread Starter
 
c00lduke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Overland Park, KS
Posts: 2,360
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
is it needed though?
Old 03-27-04, 01:59 PM
  #4  
Mr. Links

iTrader: (1)
 
Mahjik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 27,595
Received 40 Likes on 26 Posts
Originally posted by c00lduke
is it needed though?
It's there to protect the sensor from any non-air elements. I would recommend using it.
Old 03-27-04, 02:00 PM
  #5  
Ee / Cpe

 
XSTransAm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Gaithersburg, MD / WVU
Posts: 2,843
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Mazda put it there to keep fuel and oil out of the map sensor, Ill keep mine
Old 03-27-04, 04:14 PM
  #6  
The Man

 
RTS3GEN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Lee's Summit Mo.
Posts: 702
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It's actually designed to keep any fluctuations in air delivery stabilized to the map sensor. Much like in a dyno graph where you see minute peaks and valleys in the curve, these items are very sensitive to abrupt changes and since our computers(stock system) is quite slow, it cannot interpolate those changes quickly enough. Therefore, this valve is a buffeting chamber and smoothes the air flow, allowing the map sensor to input steady, smooth signal to the ecu, just like the fuel pulsation damper does for the fuel rail.
Art
Old 03-27-04, 04:21 PM
  #7  
Full Member

 
jamesuncw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: nc
Posts: 127
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
stupid q? the arrow is supposed to point down right?
Old 03-27-04, 04:28 PM
  #8  
Ee / Cpe

 
XSTransAm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Gaithersburg, MD / WVU
Posts: 2,843
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally posted by RTS3GEN
Therefore, this valve is a buffeting chamber and smoothes the air flow, allowing the map sensor to input steady, smooth signal to the ecu, just like the fuel pulsation damper does for the fuel rail.
Art
not according to this diagram

the arrow should point away from the map sensor as in this diagram too

Last edited by XSTransAm; 03-27-04 at 04:32 PM.
Old 03-27-04, 04:32 PM
  #9  
Place your ad here...

 
saxyman990's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Dayton, OH
Posts: 1,336
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally posted by RTS3GEN
It's actually designed to keep any fluctuations in air delivery stabilized to the map sensor. Much like in a dyno graph where you see minute peaks and valleys in the curve, these items are very sensitive to abrupt changes and since our computers(stock system) is quite slow, it cannot interpolate those changes quickly enough. Therefore, this valve is a buffeting chamber and smoothes the air flow, allowing the map sensor to input steady, smooth signal to the ecu, just like the fuel pulsation damper does for the fuel rail.
Art
Interesting... i've never heard this before. What about those of us on standalone computers that use a higher bit-rate? Since the ECU can interpret more signals at a faster rate, would there be any benifit to removing this? I doubt it would make any noticible difference, but it provides for an interesting thought...

Rob
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
trickster
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
25
07-01-23 04:40 PM
sen2two
AEM EMS
9
10-23-15 07:51 PM
befarrer
Microtech
3
08-22-15 05:52 PM
Snook
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
12
08-15-15 08:18 AM



Quick Reply: Is a check valve needed to go between the MAP sensor and UIM?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:19 PM.