2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.
Sponsored by:

Flywhell counter weight

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-14-05, 09:07 PM
  #1  
B O R I C U A

Thread Starter
iTrader: (14)
 
KNONFS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: VA
Posts: 5,480
Received 35 Likes on 29 Posts
Flywhell counter weight

I bought a used aluminum flywheel and it came with its counter weight, however the counter weight does not have any numbres or letters stamped on it. Is there any way to tell counter weights apart by weight?

If so, what are the different weights for the 86-88 and 89-95?
Old 02-16-05, 02:10 PM
  #2  
B O R I C U A

Thread Starter
iTrader: (14)
 
KNONFS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: VA
Posts: 5,480
Received 35 Likes on 29 Posts
Well,

I looked on all Mazda parts catalog, from 86 - 95, and i found the following:

86-88
Counter Weight part number - N327-11-521A

89-95
Counter Weight part number - N351-11-521

For some reason, I am still skeptical
Old 02-16-05, 02:52 PM
  #3  
Full Member

 
Blade8r's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: california
Posts: 136
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
ummm those look like the ECU numbers ... but i myself am 100% sure that my S4 88 has a N327 ecu... i doubt the ecu would have the same part number as the counter weight.
Old 02-16-05, 03:27 PM
  #4  
Lives on the Forum

iTrader: (8)
 
RotaryResurrection's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Morristown, TN (east of Knoxville)
Posts: 11,576
Received 25 Likes on 18 Posts
There is no way to tell them apart once removed from the mazda factory box which is marked with the part number.

I've inspected all different years of auto ctwts and cant tell any physical difference, unlike front counterweights. I've even weighed them on a digital scale accurate to .01lb and can't find any consistent difference between s4 and s5/s6 weights. I've weighed both stock weights from engines I've parted out, and new in the box weights that came with customer flywheels.
Old 02-16-05, 03:38 PM
  #5  
Like Ghandi with a gun

 
Kenteth's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Rapid City, SD
Posts: 4,584
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So... you're saying it doesn't matter kevin?
Old 02-16-05, 03:44 PM
  #6  
Open up! Search Warrant!

 
Project84's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Kicking down doors in a neighborhood near you
Posts: 3,838
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by Blade8r
ummm those look like the ECU numbers ... but i myself am 100% sure that my S4 88 has a N327 ecu... i doubt the ecu would have the same part number as the counter weight.
ECU numbers? Most of the stock parts start with the letter N and a 3 digit number. Thats just the way Mazda did it. Its not just for th ECUs.
Old 02-16-05, 03:49 PM
  #7  
Lives on the Forum

iTrader: (8)
 
RotaryResurrection's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Morristown, TN (east of Knoxville)
Posts: 11,576
Received 25 Likes on 18 Posts
So... you're saying it doesn't matter kevin?
No, Im not saying that. I am saying that it probably wouldnt make a big difference if you were to use one from a different year, because they weight is so close...within hundredths of a lb.

There must be a distinction between them, or mazda wouldnt go to the trouble of making more than one part. I just havent found out what that difference is yet, and how to detect it visually.
Old 02-16-05, 04:04 PM
  #8  
Is that thing Turbo?

 
totallimmortal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Maryland
Posts: 1,411
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
has anyone ever used the wrong year counterwieght?
Old 02-16-05, 04:13 PM
  #9  
Open up! Search Warrant!

 
Project84's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Kicking down doors in a neighborhood near you
Posts: 3,838
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by RotaryResurrection
No, Im not saying that. I am saying that it probably wouldnt make a big difference if you were to use one from a different year, because they weight is so close...within hundredths of a lb.

There must be a distinction between them, or mazda wouldnt go to the trouble of making more than one part. I just havent found out what that difference is yet, and how to detect it visually.
Maybe its got something to do with the location of the mass relative to center of the rotation. They may look the same shape and be the same size, but maybe has more mass further away from the center of the hole. I'd don't know, I'm talking out my ***.
Old 02-16-05, 04:25 PM
  #10  
Lives on the Forum

iTrader: (8)
 
RotaryResurrection's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Morristown, TN (east of Knoxville)
Posts: 11,576
Received 25 Likes on 18 Posts
No, the keyway is timed in the same spot, and the dimensions of the weight are identical. Even the number of balance holes drilled in the bottom is usually the same. And the thickness of the weight end is the same.
Old 02-16-05, 04:35 PM
  #11  
B O R I C U A

Thread Starter
iTrader: (14)
 
KNONFS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: VA
Posts: 5,480
Received 35 Likes on 29 Posts
Originally Posted by RotaryResurrection
There is no way to tell them apart once removed from the mazda factory box which is marked with the part number.

I've inspected all different years of auto ctwts and cant tell any physical difference, unlike front counterweights. I've even weighed them on a digital scale accurate to .01lb and can't find any consistent difference between s4 and s5/s6 weights. I've weighed both stock weights from engines I've parted out, and new in the box weights that came with customer flywheels.
Based on what you are saying, and my findings, I am starting to believe that the 89-95 are in fact the same counter weight. The part numbers can be verified by anyone, here:
http://www.mazdaformance.com/rx7.htm

Note - Pages are based by the adobe number, not the mazda catalog number)

89-90 - Page 31
91-92 - Page 28
93 - Page 21
94 - Page 21
95 - Page 20

Now, I am not a mazda parts expert, not even close; but why would mazda use the same part numbers for parts that aren't exactly identical? All rotors, housings, bearings have different part numbers!

This is driving me insane
Old 02-16-05, 07:13 PM
  #12  
Rotary Freak

iTrader: (7)
 
sub9lulu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: FL
Posts: 2,739
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
thats interesting ... why do i need to get 86-88 auto counter weight to match my 87 rotors when they are actually all the same ...
Old 02-16-05, 08:04 PM
  #13  
B O R I C U A

Thread Starter
iTrader: (14)
 
KNONFS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: VA
Posts: 5,480
Received 35 Likes on 29 Posts
Originally Posted by sub9lulu
thats interesting ... why do i need to get 86-88 auto counter weight to match my 87 rotors when they are actually all the same ...
Actually the 86-88 counter weight is the ONLY one that DOES have a different number than the rest of the counter weights
Old 02-16-05, 08:27 PM
  #14  
Lives on the Forum

iTrader: (8)
 
RotaryResurrection's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Morristown, TN (east of Knoxville)
Posts: 11,576
Received 25 Likes on 18 Posts
89-91 rotating assemblies are balanced teh same, so that is correct.

The 86-88 and 89-95 assemblies have different weights, so they should be balanced differently. And indeed there are different PN's for the 2 rear weights. But, I can't distinguish any physical or weight difference between the 2 parts. That's what we're discussing...the difference between s4 and s5/6 weights.
Old 02-16-05, 08:31 PM
  #15  
Rotary Freak

iTrader: (7)
 
sub9lulu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: FL
Posts: 2,739
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by KNONFS
Actually the 86-88 counter weight is the ONLY one that DOES have a different number than the rest of the counter weights
well the 86-88 rotor weight the same, and then the 89 and up rotor weight the same
Old 02-16-05, 08:34 PM
  #16  
B O R I C U A

Thread Starter
iTrader: (14)
 
KNONFS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: VA
Posts: 5,480
Received 35 Likes on 29 Posts
Originally Posted by RotaryResurrection
89-91 rotating assemblies are balanced teh same, so that is correct.

The 86-88 and 89-95 assemblies have different weights, so they should be balanced differently. And indeed there are different PN's for the 2 rear weights. But, I can't distinguish any physical or weight difference between the 2 parts. That's what we're discussing...the difference between s4 and s5/6 weights.
Ohh my bad

I was told by somebody at RB this morning, that S4, S5, and S6 were all different, hence my investigation. All in all, I should be ok, since I have a S6 counter weight going in to a S5 engine.

Thanks
Old 08-24-05, 05:38 PM
  #17  
Boost Addict

iTrader: (3)
 
nashman69g's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Metairie, LA near new orleans
Posts: 1,898
Received 13 Likes on 8 Posts
I bringing this back...would like to know more...I've been reading that you need the counter weight from the correct year; but now we're saying that things seem the same? So, I would like to know if the weights need to be the from the same year or not...I'm so confused now!!
Old 08-24-05, 06:48 PM
  #18  
Lives on the Forum

iTrader: (8)
 
RotaryResurrection's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Morristown, TN (east of Knoxville)
Posts: 11,576
Received 25 Likes on 18 Posts
I personally wouldnt take a chance, and would buy the correct part for the year of engine/rotating assembly you're working with. I'm just saying that I can find no difference between the 2 parts in my own physical inspection. Take that for what it's worth.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
MILOS7
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
6
05-09-16 06:39 AM
Vartok
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
16
10-08-15 04:49 PM



Quick Reply: Flywhell counter weight



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:17 AM.