What does Lean and Rich really mean?
#1
Not a registered voter
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: East Wenatchee, WA
Posts: 266
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
What does Lean and Rich really mean?
I have a friend that says lean and rich is the ratio of oil and air or fuel or something.
Now, I've always thought it's the air/fuel ratio but this guy does know more than me about cars so just thought I would clear it up.
And sorry if this has been asked before but seaching turns up some poop and various crap but not any info.
Now, I've always thought it's the air/fuel ratio but this guy does know more than me about cars so just thought I would clear it up.
And sorry if this has been asked before but seaching turns up some poop and various crap but not any info.
#3
My wife bought me 2 RX-7s
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada
Posts: 2,328
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
To run lean is to run an a/f (air-fuel) mixture that contains too much air and not enough fuel. Running rich is just the opposite, too much fuel and not enough air. Of course, when I say 'not enough' of one or the other, that's based on what the car wants to run at peak efficiency.
It has nothing to do with oil.
It has nothing to do with oil.
#6
Absolute Power is Awesome
Originally posted by MosesX605
To run lean is to run an a/f (air-fuel) mixture that contains too much air and not enough fuel. Running rich is just the opposite, too much fuel and not enough air. Of course, when I say 'not enough' of one or the other, that's based on what the car wants to run at peak efficiency.
It has nothing to do with oil.
To run lean is to run an a/f (air-fuel) mixture that contains too much air and not enough fuel. Running rich is just the opposite, too much fuel and not enough air. Of course, when I say 'not enough' of one or the other, that's based on what the car wants to run at peak efficiency.
It has nothing to do with oil.
Any ratio of air to fuel (air/fuel) that is larger than this ratio means that there is more air than needed for this ideal combustion mixture. Any ratio smaller means that there is more fuel than needed for the ideal combustion.
This ratio is different depending on the fuel. Also, no combustion is ideal due to many factors, so even at the stoicometric ratio, there will still in reality be non-ideal exhaust products.
#7
ROTOR THAT PUSSY BITCH
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: CANOGA PARK
Posts: 623
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The stoicometric ratio is based on what's the best ratio the CAT can convert those bad gasses into H20 and CO2 I think the ratio was 14.7 parts air and 1 part fuel... some say 15 to 1 but whose counting...
Trending Topics
#8
i say what i want
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: richmond, va
Posts: 1,866
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by MRGSL-SE
The stoicometric ratio is based on what's the best ratio the CAT can convert those bad gasses into H20 and CO2 I think the ratio was 14.7 parts air and 1 part fuel... some say 15 to 1 but whose counting...
The stoicometric ratio is based on what's the best ratio the CAT can convert those bad gasses into H20 and CO2 I think the ratio was 14.7 parts air and 1 part fuel... some say 15 to 1 but whose counting...
#9
Not a registered voter
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: East Wenatchee, WA
Posts: 266
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Oh of course!
Yes, quite!
I do fancy a intelectual conversation now and again.
Who am I kidding? I have no idea what you guys are talking about.
Yes, quite!
I do fancy a intelectual conversation now and again.
Who am I kidding? I have no idea what you guys are talking about.
#10
Find Racing
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 1,219
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I always believed that it was in the 14's for an n/a engine and mid 12's to mid 13's for a turbo car. I never did know why it would be so different and frankly it doesn't matter too much to me. My car sits pretty at 14.7 almost all the time (I love having a stand alone ems ).
#11
Absolute Power is Awesome
Originally posted by MRGSL-SE
The stoicometric ratio is based on what's the best ratio the CAT can convert those bad gasses into H20 and CO2 I think the ratio was 14.7 parts air and 1 part fuel... some say 15 to 1 but whose counting...
The stoicometric ratio is based on what's the best ratio the CAT can convert those bad gasses into H20 and CO2 I think the ratio was 14.7 parts air and 1 part fuel... some say 15 to 1 but whose counting...
For gasoline, it's 14.7:1 air:fuel on a mass basis. This doesn't have anything to do with the aspiration of the car, tubo or natural. It's dependent on the hydrocarbon fuel, so gasoline is different from propane or hexane or diesel.
Most engines and especialy rotories run rich. The combustion of a rich mixture is cooler than a lean mixture so it's safer for the engine to be rich. Also, the maximum power of an engine is rich of stoic. For these reasons you will see that people tune to a/f ratios in the 11-13 range.
Under cruising, where the engine is at a constant speed and a fairly low load is the only time when you want your car to be running near stoicometric.
Last edited by purple82; 04-12-03 at 04:14 PM.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post