My own thread by: FDSeoul
Lives on the Forum
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 23,563
Likes: 0
From: san diego
ok lets look at this....
Toyota Supra MK IV
Production 1993–2002
Assembly Motomachi, Japan[11]
Platform JZA8x
Engine(s) 3.0 L (2997 cc) 2JZ-GE I6
3.0 L (2997 cc) 2JZ-GTE I6
Transmission(s) 5-speed W58 manual
6-speed V16x manual
4-Speed A341E automatic
Wheelbase 2550 mm (100.4 in)
Length 4515 mm (177.8 in) (1993-1998)
4514 mm (177.7 in) (1999-2002)
Width 1811 mm (71.3 in)
Height 1265 mm (49.8 in) (1993-1998)
1275 mm (50.2 in) (1999-2002)
Curb weight 1460 kg (3219 lb) (non-turbo)
1581 kg (3486 lb) {turbo}
Fuel capacity 70 litres (18.5 US gal)[2]
Toyota Supra Mark III
Production 1986.5–1992 (1993 in Japan)
Platform MA7x
GA7x
JZA7x
Engine(s) 2.0 L (1988 cc) 1G-GTE I6
2.5 L (2491 cc) 1JZ-GTE I6
3.0 L (2954 cc) 7M-GE I6
3.0 L (2954 cc) 7M-GTE I6
Transmission(s) 5-speed W58 manual
5-speed R154 manual
4-Speed A340E automatic
Wheelbase 2596 mm (102.2 in)
Length 4620 mm (181.9 in)
Width 1745 mm (68.7 in)
Height 1310 mm (51.6 in) (1986.5-88)
1301 mm (51.2 in) (1989-92)
Curb weight 1537 kg (3389 lb) (manual)
1595 kg (3516 lb) (automatic)
Fuel capacity 70 litres (18.5 US gal)[9]
the MKIII is wideer wheel base and longer than the MKIV and MKV. but it is narrower.....and is a bit taller.
the MKIII weighs less. granted not by much but still it weighs less.... and topped out (depending on motor and tranny choice)at about 280 ponies and 272 ft lbs
the MKIV and MKV 320 ish ponies and 315 ft-lbs
honestly. i stick to me previous statement i have more fun tossing the MKIII around....
just feels better to me
Toyota Supra MK IV
Production 1993–2002
Assembly Motomachi, Japan[11]
Platform JZA8x
Engine(s) 3.0 L (2997 cc) 2JZ-GE I6
3.0 L (2997 cc) 2JZ-GTE I6
Transmission(s) 5-speed W58 manual
6-speed V16x manual
4-Speed A341E automatic
Wheelbase 2550 mm (100.4 in)
Length 4515 mm (177.8 in) (1993-1998)
4514 mm (177.7 in) (1999-2002)
Width 1811 mm (71.3 in)
Height 1265 mm (49.8 in) (1993-1998)
1275 mm (50.2 in) (1999-2002)
Curb weight 1460 kg (3219 lb) (non-turbo)
1581 kg (3486 lb) {turbo}
Fuel capacity 70 litres (18.5 US gal)[2]
Toyota Supra Mark III
Production 1986.5–1992 (1993 in Japan)
Platform MA7x
GA7x
JZA7x
Engine(s) 2.0 L (1988 cc) 1G-GTE I6
2.5 L (2491 cc) 1JZ-GTE I6
3.0 L (2954 cc) 7M-GE I6
3.0 L (2954 cc) 7M-GTE I6
Transmission(s) 5-speed W58 manual
5-speed R154 manual
4-Speed A340E automatic
Wheelbase 2596 mm (102.2 in)
Length 4620 mm (181.9 in)
Width 1745 mm (68.7 in)
Height 1310 mm (51.6 in) (1986.5-88)
1301 mm (51.2 in) (1989-92)
Curb weight 1537 kg (3389 lb) (manual)
1595 kg (3516 lb) (automatic)
Fuel capacity 70 litres (18.5 US gal)[9]
the MKIII is wideer wheel base and longer than the MKIV and MKV. but it is narrower.....and is a bit taller.
the MKIII weighs less. granted not by much but still it weighs less.... and topped out (depending on motor and tranny choice)at about 280 ponies and 272 ft lbs
the MKIV and MKV 320 ish ponies and 315 ft-lbs
honestly. i stick to me previous statement i have more fun tossing the MKIII around....
just feels better to me
DJ Touch #1 fan
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,298
Likes: 0
From: Riverside, CA
ok lets look at this....
Toyota Supra MK IV
Production 1993–2002
Assembly Motomachi, Japan[11]
Platform JZA8x
Engine(s) 3.0 L (2997 cc) 2JZ-GE I6
3.0 L (2997 cc) 2JZ-GTE I6
Transmission(s) 5-speed W58 manual
6-speed V16x manual
4-Speed A341E automatic
Wheelbase 2550 mm (100.4 in)
Length 4515 mm (177.8 in) (1993-1998)
4514 mm (177.7 in) (1999-2002)
Width 1811 mm (71.3 in)
Height 1265 mm (49.8 in) (1993-1998)
1275 mm (50.2 in) (1999-2002)
Curb weight 1460 kg (3219 lb) (non-turbo)
1581 kg (3486 lb) {turbo}
Fuel capacity 70 litres (18.5 US gal)[2]
Toyota Supra Mark III
Production 1986.5–1992 (1993 in Japan)
Platform MA7x
GA7x
JZA7x
Engine(s) 2.0 L (1988 cc) 1G-GTE I6
2.5 L (2491 cc) 1JZ-GTE I6
3.0 L (2954 cc) 7M-GE I6
3.0 L (2954 cc) 7M-GTE I6
Transmission(s) 5-speed W58 manual
5-speed R154 manual
4-Speed A340E automatic
Wheelbase 2596 mm (102.2 in)
Length 4620 mm (181.9 in)
Width 1745 mm (68.7 in)
Height 1310 mm (51.6 in) (1986.5-88)
1301 mm (51.2 in) (1989-92)
Curb weight 1537 kg (3389 lb) (manual)
1595 kg (3516 lb) (automatic)
Fuel capacity 70 litres (18.5 US gal)[9]
the MKIII is wideer wheel base and longer than the MKIV and MKV. but it is narrower.....and is a bit taller.
the MKIII weighs less. granted not by much but still it weighs less.... and topped out (depending on motor and tranny choice)at about 280 ponies and 272 ft lbs
the MKIV and MKV 320 ish ponies and 315 ft-lbs
honestly. i stick to me previous statement i have more fun tossing the MKIV around....
just feels better to me
Toyota Supra MK IV
Production 1993–2002
Assembly Motomachi, Japan[11]
Platform JZA8x
Engine(s) 3.0 L (2997 cc) 2JZ-GE I6
3.0 L (2997 cc) 2JZ-GTE I6
Transmission(s) 5-speed W58 manual
6-speed V16x manual
4-Speed A341E automatic
Wheelbase 2550 mm (100.4 in)
Length 4515 mm (177.8 in) (1993-1998)
4514 mm (177.7 in) (1999-2002)
Width 1811 mm (71.3 in)
Height 1265 mm (49.8 in) (1993-1998)
1275 mm (50.2 in) (1999-2002)
Curb weight 1460 kg (3219 lb) (non-turbo)
1581 kg (3486 lb) {turbo}
Fuel capacity 70 litres (18.5 US gal)[2]
Toyota Supra Mark III
Production 1986.5–1992 (1993 in Japan)
Platform MA7x
GA7x
JZA7x
Engine(s) 2.0 L (1988 cc) 1G-GTE I6
2.5 L (2491 cc) 1JZ-GTE I6
3.0 L (2954 cc) 7M-GE I6
3.0 L (2954 cc) 7M-GTE I6
Transmission(s) 5-speed W58 manual
5-speed R154 manual
4-Speed A340E automatic
Wheelbase 2596 mm (102.2 in)
Length 4620 mm (181.9 in)
Width 1745 mm (68.7 in)
Height 1310 mm (51.6 in) (1986.5-88)
1301 mm (51.2 in) (1989-92)
Curb weight 1537 kg (3389 lb) (manual)
1595 kg (3516 lb) (automatic)
Fuel capacity 70 litres (18.5 US gal)[9]
the MKIII is wideer wheel base and longer than the MKIV and MKV. but it is narrower.....and is a bit taller.
the MKIII weighs less. granted not by much but still it weighs less.... and topped out (depending on motor and tranny choice)at about 280 ponies and 272 ft lbs
the MKIV and MKV 320 ish ponies and 315 ft-lbs
honestly. i stick to me previous statement i have more fun tossing the MKIV around....
just feels better to me
I'll let you drive my IV when I get it...
Theeeenn we'll see...
DJ Touch #1 fan
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,298
Likes: 0
From: Riverside, CA
when I see a clean TII vert...
Lives on the Forum
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 23,563
Likes: 0
From: san diego
^^^bloated door wedge
^^^sex on wheels
the lines on the FB are just sooooo much cleaner
the FC looks like that girl that gains the freshman 20. she is trying so hard to be sexy but just fails miserably at it
Lives on the Forum
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 23,563
Likes: 0
From: san diego
DJ Touch #1 fan
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,298
Likes: 0
From: Riverside, CA
Nawwwww
Your FB looks decent, most FB's do not. I actually think yours is one of my favorites. BUT, you haven't seen DKJ's TII Vert. O M G, it destroys any chance any FB has at being sechsay. It is pure orgasmic.
I had a pic of it somewhere, but I can't find it
Your FB looks decent, most FB's do not. I actually think yours is one of my favorites. BUT, you haven't seen DKJ's TII Vert. O M G, it destroys any chance any FB has at being sechsay. It is pure orgasmic.
I had a pic of it somewhere, but I can't find it
Rotary Enthusiast
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,000
Likes: 0
From: san diego
psss ***** please the fc is the teacher at the high school that all the little fb's look up to and want to ****
DJ Touch #1 fan
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,298
Likes: 0
From: Riverside, CA
Lives on the Forum
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 23,563
Likes: 0
From: san diego
they feel far to much like most of the other 90s ish "sports cars" out there. that were product of late 70 early 80s real sports cars that ended up gaining a ton of weight which of course in turn fucked the whole deal up
DJ Touch #1 fan
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,298
Likes: 0
From: Riverside, CA
i have driven plenty of them. not impressed. they just dont feel right.....
they feel far to much like most of the other 90s ish "sports cars" out there. that were product of late 70 early 80s real sports cars that ended up gaining a ton of weight which of course in turn fucked the whole deal up
they feel far to much like most of the other 90s ish "sports cars" out there. that were product of late 70 early 80s real sports cars that ended up gaining a ton of weight which of course in turn fucked the whole deal up
Mountain run!
The FC's handling is far superior to that of the FB. Doesn't help the FB any with their 13" wheels
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,938
Likes: 3
From: Ann Arbor, Dirty Glove
The garage (oh yeah, and house) is coming soon. I just found out the wife can work with an interim TS clearance. The scooby might have to wait a month or two, we'll see. It's gravy, I'll have the room to start the FEED conversion!
Is it bad to say I still want that new car? Chris, you know you can get a new WRX for 275 a month? That's pretty crazy.
Is it bad to say I still want that new car? Chris, you know you can get a new WRX for 275 a month? That's pretty crazy.
Rotary Enthusiast
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,000
Likes: 0
From: san diego
yeah and like a dumbass i was that kid that everybody hated because mommy paid it off and then the little spoiled brat decided to trade it in for a titan that was just a total piece of ****
Lives on the Forum
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 23,563
Likes: 0
From: san diego
225/50/15 on the rear
DJ Touch #1 fan
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,298
Likes: 0
From: Riverside, CA
It's official. Teh FB vs. Teh FC in an Initial D type battle for the ultimate bragging rights.
No but really... come to the next mountain run, and run it with me. I wanna see how I'll do against jo0r FB. What kind of suspension you running?
