Transplanting a 4.6l Ford Cobra engine?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 1, 2008 | 12:36 AM
  #1  
GoRacer's Avatar
Thread Starter
Speed Mach Go Go Go
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 4,772
Likes: 2
From: My 350Z Roadster kicks my RX7's butt
Question Transplanting a 4.6l Ford Cobra engine?

I'm not sure what section this goes in to so feel free to move it.

I'm not sure why this hasn't been looked at before. A nissan engine makes no sense at all. I understand a Corvette engine since the bodies are very similar and they share a similar passion but you still put in a Ford rear end. Ford owns most of Mazda and you now see Ford/Mazda combo dealerships.

The GT500 and the GT40 use a 5.4l 4v(x8) supercharged engine which is too large but a 4.6l Aluminator crate engine with a Whipple supercharger has possibilities. I don't remember what liter the Corvette Lt1 is. I don't remember the person that's been building his for over 10years? I wanted to ask him. I'm not sure abut fitting the Mustang transmission. Anyhow, if anybody has any info please post.
Reply
Old Feb 1, 2008 | 12:50 AM
  #2  
dhays's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,151
Likes: 0
From: University Place, WA
Hm,... my '02 Ford Explorer has a 4.6L V8 that is essentially the same as the Mustang 4.6L EXCEPT, the Explorer has an aluminum block rather than the iron block the mustang does. About 75 lbs lighter I think.
Reply
Old Feb 1, 2008 | 01:11 AM
  #3  
Specter328's Avatar
NASA TTS Build
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 816
Likes: 0
From: New York
I believe that since the Ford V8s are DOHC motors they are quite a bit larger then say a OHC LSX motor.

Note: I may be wrong about this as I did not look up the specs
Reply
Old Feb 1, 2008 | 01:21 AM
  #4  
slo's Avatar
slo
registered user
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,469
Likes: 0
From: San Diego
No overhead cams in an LSX


Originally Posted by Specter328
I believe that since the Ford V8s are DOHC motors they are quite a bit larger then say a OHC LSX motor.

Note: I may be wrong about this as I did not look up the specs
Reply
Old Feb 1, 2008 | 04:32 AM
  #5  
fendamonky's Avatar
F'n Newbie...
Tenured Member: 15 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,942
Likes: 323
From: Nokesville, Va
Pretty sure the current 4.6l V8's are SOHC..

I have a buddy that is trashing his 4.6 for a 5.4l short block, and we're putting twin turbo's on it.. gunna be mean as hell...

This has me mildly intimidated. Though him being able to go faster, sooner won't be that bad since I'm helping with the build...
Reply
Old Feb 1, 2008 | 07:28 AM
  #6  
Dan Stevenson's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 302
Likes: 0
From: Warner Robins, GA
We actually talked about putting one of these in my mustang. The problem was the width of the 4.6L engines. I would have to cut the shock towers to get it to fit.
Reply
Old Feb 1, 2008 | 08:29 AM
  #7  
NissanConvert's Avatar
Please somebody help!!!
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,442
Likes: 0
From: Woodridge, IL
Originally Posted by fendamonky
Pretty sure the current 4.6l V8's are SOHC..
Nope, the latest 4.6 modulars are dohc. there 3 different simple versions, probably with some ecu tuning differences or intake manifold tweaks, etc.

SOHC 2 valve (since early 90's)
SOHC 3 valve (new mustang)
DOHC 4 valve (mid 90's mark8, since then it's been in a few different cars)

It interesting to note that the supercharged SVT slobra uses an iron block version of the 4 valve. I know with an ecu flash those things are pretty beastly.

From what the previous posters have noted though i think you might want to go with a narrower* V.
Reply
Old Feb 1, 2008 | 07:37 PM
  #8  
GoRacer's Avatar
Thread Starter
Speed Mach Go Go Go
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 4,772
Likes: 2
From: My 350Z Roadster kicks my RX7's butt
Yeah the GT500 and GT40 (latest) are 4v/cyclinder and looks like a Roush supercharger. Ford racing has an aluminum 4.6l mustang engine and one of the guys their has it supercharged to 600hp. I have no idea about the size and fitment. What's the name of the guy with the 1,000 page thread doing the Corvette LT1 transplant?
Reply
Old Feb 2, 2008 | 10:25 PM
  #9  
Enzo_Guy's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
From: Maryland
The Ford 4.6L is a rather large motor for what it is. The motor is really lacking the technology (and in many ways, the sheer simplicity) that the Chevrolet motors incorporate to make them much better performers. I think this a rather less-travelled route, as most of the Ford guys seem to go either 302 or 351.

As for fitting a 5.4L, that is debatable. Videos surfaced a little while back of a guy with a 427 BBC mounted in an FB. Nothing is impossible, and I think a 5.4L could be fitted if someone had the time, money, and capabilities to fabricate their own mounts for it (oh, and not to mention pay Ford's prices for motors). I'd be interested to see how you worked the headers and exhaust though, as that will probably be one of the biggest problems outside mounting the motor.
Reply
Old Feb 3, 2008 | 06:07 AM
  #10  
WaLieN's Avatar
Call me gramps!
Tenured Member: 20 Years
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,334
Likes: 0
From: Detroit, MI
Originally Posted by Enzo_Guy
The Ford 4.6L is a rather large motor for what it is. The motor is really lacking the technology (and in many ways, the sheer simplicity) that the Chevrolet motors incorporate to make them much better performers. I think this a rather less-travelled route, as most of the Ford guys seem to go either 302 or 351.

As for fitting a 5.4L, that is debatable. Videos surfaced a little while back of a guy with a 427 BBC mounted in an FB. Nothing is impossible, and I think a 5.4L could be fitted if someone had the time, money, and capabilities to fabricate their own mounts for it (oh, and not to mention pay Ford's prices for motors). I'd be interested to see how you worked the headers and exhaust though, as that will probably be one of the biggest problems outside mounting the motor.
It's much more difficult than that. The modular line of motors (4.6L, 5.4L, SOHC, DOCH, 2V, 3V, 4V) simply will not fit without MAJOR MODIFICATIONS.

The fact is, the modular line of motors are much wider than the older Ford Small Blocks.

The following is from Granny's Speed Shop
Engine / Transmission Choices...
...The RX-7's engine compartment / steering rack location somewhat dictates which engines are best suited for this conversion. The reason we prefer to use Chevy's rear sump small block engines?...engines with an oil sump located to the rear, such as the small block Chevy, allow for a lower and more rearward engine location while still clearing the RX-7's steering rack. Front sump engines, even engine's with a small front sump such as the Ford 5.0 w/ the FOX body pan, would require either a far forward engine location or re-location of the RX-7's steering rack. Narrower engines such as pushrod V-8s will clear the RX-7's brake booster, while overhead cam engines such as the Ford 4.6 would require some creative re-working of the RX-7's brake system.

Reply
Old Feb 3, 2008 | 09:24 AM
  #11  
Enzo_Guy's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
From: Maryland
Originally Posted by WaLieN
It's much more difficult than that. The modular line of motors (4.6L, 5.4L, SOHC, DOCH, 2V, 3V, 4V) simply will not fit without MAJOR MODIFICATIONS.

The fact is, the modular line of motors are much wider than the older Ford Small Blocks.

The following is from Granny's Speed Shop

[/COLOR][/SIZE][/FONT]
Haha! It was late at night and I was getting the 4.6L confused with the 302 thinking that it was about the same size! But, I would give some serious respect to whoever managed to mount a crate 5.7L Hemi in an RX-7, I haven't heard of that being done.
Reply
Old Feb 4, 2008 | 03:09 PM
  #12  
Merc63's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 210
Likes: 0
From: People's Republic of Maryland
4.6 vs 5.0:



The modular motor is physically larger than the old 460!

my 5.0 fit in the FC like it was a tiny V6:



Mine had a 49/51 f/r weight distribution, and no relocation of the crossmember/steering rack. Granny's used my car to advertise their kit (even though my car did NOT use their kit) and they still got it wrong.
Reply
Old Feb 4, 2008 | 08:25 PM
  #13  
Enzo_Guy's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
From: Maryland
Originally Posted by Merc63
4.6 vs 5.0:



The modular motor is physically larger than the old 460!

my 5.0 fit in the FC like it was a tiny V6:



Mine had a 49/51 f/r weight distribution, and no relocation of the crossmember/steering rack. Granny's used my car to advertise their kit (even though my car did NOT use their kit) and they still got it wrong.
Funny that you're also from MD and have that color car (saw your specific one on cardomain the other day). There is another guy with an '85 SBC in Crownsville with the exact same paintjob. I'm looking to do an SBC drop into an FC, so far I emailed a guy in NJ about a convertible that looks pretty clean and I'm waiting for his response.

But yeah that 4.6L is huge and it seems to me to be rather pointless. Good job keeping it old school with that carburetor, it's the way to keep things simple and still get good performance.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
turbo-minivan
General Rotary Tech Support
69
Feb 4, 2016 12:29 AM
Wicked93gs
Other Engine Conversions - non V-8
0
Aug 23, 2015 10:14 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:21 PM.