A little progress...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 4, 2007 | 10:45 AM
  #1  
jimlab's Avatar
Thread Starter
Super Snuggles
Tenured Member 20 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 10,091
Likes: 34
From: Redmond, WA
A little progress...









Back on jack stands, right where it belongs.
Attached Thumbnails A little progress...-p3310115.jpg   A little progress...-p3310119.jpg   A little progress...-p3310116.jpg   A little progress...-p3310122.jpg  
Reply
Old Apr 4, 2007 | 10:48 AM
  #2  
jimlab's Avatar
Thread Starter
Super Snuggles
Tenured Member 20 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 10,091
Likes: 34
From: Redmond, WA
L92 heads and L76 intake...



LS7 intake vs. L76 intake...

Attached Thumbnails A little progress...-p1300040.jpg   A little progress...-p1300044.jpg  
Reply
Old Apr 4, 2007 | 11:25 AM
  #3  
KaoticFdR1's Avatar
Be a Hero...Punch a Koala
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,022
Likes: 0
From: Evansville, IN
So what are the pro's con's with the LS7 intake and heads vs the new parts?

BTW that's sexy as hell!!!
Reply
Old Apr 5, 2007 | 12:27 PM
  #4  
jimlab's Avatar
Thread Starter
Super Snuggles
Tenured Member 20 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 10,091
Likes: 34
From: Redmond, WA
Originally Posted by KaoticFdR1
So what are the pro's con's with the LS7 intake and heads vs the new parts?
Pro: The L92s flow about 335 cfm out of the box, as cast, and can be ported further. They were originally intended for use with the LS2 on the next generation Z06 before GM decided that 427 CID would be required to meet the horsepower and drivability goals and started development of the LS7. The port shape and size of the two are very similar.

Pro: A pair of L92s and an L76 intake cost less than a single assembled LS7 head (~$1,200 vs. ~$1,700). With a cam in the 23x range, the L92/L76 combo can make 550+ horsepower on a bone stock LS2 bottom end.

Con: The L92 heads will not work on an LS1 or LS6 because they require at least a 4.0" bore, and a larger bore would be ideal. However, rumor is that GM is creating an L92-derived head for the LS1/LS6 family of engines.

Con: Currently, the L76 intake (unless you want a carb intake) is the only one that will work with the L92 heads. There are no aftermarket options yet that I know of (but it's only a matter of time).

Con: An LS7 intake and heads will generally make more power than a set of L92 heads and L76 intake, all other factors being equal.

Con: It's claimed that the L76 intake will become a restriction at higher (6,500+) rpm before the LS7 intake because it has less plenum volume, but it has shorter runner lengths, which typically lend themselves more to higher rpm use. I haven't seen a definitive conclusion on this point yet, but it's something to consider.
Reply
Old Apr 5, 2007 | 12:34 PM
  #5  
dradon03's Avatar
Derwin
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,888
Likes: 0
From: MTL, QC
Car is so clean.
Reply
Old Apr 5, 2007 | 03:03 PM
  #6  
KaoticFdR1's Avatar
Be a Hero...Punch a Koala
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,022
Likes: 0
From: Evansville, IN
wow...i think i just found what i'd like to run...I've already decided to go the piston route but I'm just gonna save some more money and go the LS2 route and use said combo eventually. 550rwhp is my goal for a street car and some road racing. I may even take it to the drag strip every once in a while. Thanks for the info and good luck. Sooooo clean.
Reply
Old Apr 5, 2007 | 10:30 PM
  #7  
chingon's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 58
Likes: 0
From: EL PASO TX
where's the monster thread? I can't seem to find it.
Reply
Old Apr 6, 2007 | 01:07 AM
  #8  
jimlab's Avatar
Thread Starter
Super Snuggles
Tenured Member 20 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 10,091
Likes: 34
From: Redmond, WA
Originally Posted by chingon
where's the monster thread? I can't seem to find it.
Gone. At least half the information in it was obsolete and people were just junking it up with stupid comments.
Reply
Old Apr 6, 2007 | 01:21 AM
  #9  
jimlab's Avatar
Thread Starter
Super Snuggles
Tenured Member 20 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 10,091
Likes: 34
From: Redmond, WA
Attached Thumbnails A little progress...-intakes.jpg  
Reply
Old Apr 6, 2007 | 12:02 PM
  #10  
NickSimcheck's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 102
Likes: 0
From: South Lyon, Mich
I came here for two reasons,

A: I'm lookng at LSx/FD's for sale.

B: To hopefully see Jimlabs LT1/FD run.


Now I see that the LT1 is gone, so I'm assuming you got a crate LS7? Or are you having a LSx made up to your specs?

I gotta give it to you though, nobody knows how to polish, clean, wax, seal, and repeat a turd like you do!
Reply
Old Apr 6, 2007 | 12:11 PM
  #11  
2MCHPWR's Avatar
FD / LSX
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,359
Likes: 0
From: wawayanda, NY
looking good. what wheels are they?
Reply
Old Apr 6, 2007 | 01:02 PM
  #12  
jimlab's Avatar
Thread Starter
Super Snuggles
Tenured Member 20 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 10,091
Likes: 34
From: Redmond, WA
Originally Posted by 2MCHPWR
looking good. what wheels are they?
19" Volk TE-37s, stripped and polished.
Reply
Old Apr 7, 2007 | 09:26 AM
  #13  
Turbo 3's Avatar
Safety Guy
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,433
Likes: 0
From: Apple Valley area in MN
are you planning on staying naturally aspirated? Just curious as you are progressing down the same path I was considering but instead of replacing the intake, going with a Magnuson SC instead.
Reply
Old Apr 8, 2007 | 10:11 PM
  #14  
paul_3rdgen's Avatar
Too cold in the garage
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 795
Likes: 6
From: Toronto
Looking good Jim, good choice of wheels!
Reply
Old Apr 9, 2007 | 09:51 AM
  #15  
wptrx7's Avatar
Newb Photog
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 2,171
Likes: 0
From: new jersey
Is it me or does the L76 intake mani have a lower profile than the LS7? Is that the new cradle that you are developing?

Glad to see some progress? How is the new house going? that 47" must be for the garage and not the media room I hope, LOL.
Reply
Old Apr 9, 2007 | 11:21 AM
  #16  
wptrx7's Avatar
Newb Photog
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 2,171
Likes: 0
From: new jersey
Because you had your thread deleted, your post count went down?
Reply
Old Apr 9, 2007 | 12:55 PM
  #17  
kwman's Avatar
I Hate traction
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 173
Likes: 0
From: Wilmington NC
Jim, good to see some of your progress. That color looks absolutely gorgeous on that car. Hopefully we'll see you over on the V8RX7forum, if those guys will stop slapping each other like girls...anywho. Take care.

-Kwman AKA sweatyK
Reply
Old Apr 10, 2007 | 03:09 PM
  #18  
gnx7's Avatar
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,090
Likes: 25
From: San Francisco, CA
Sounds like you have renewed interest the project again. Good.

The LS7 heads also have 2.20" titanium intake valves which should allow you to spin the motor higher. Out of the box they flow 360cfm...... they can benefit from have the exhaust side ported to balance out the flow.

Bang for the buck the L92/L76 setup is hard to beat.... I'll wager you go with the LS7 stuff.
Reply
Old Apr 10, 2007 | 06:13 PM
  #19  
jimlab's Avatar
Thread Starter
Super Snuggles
Tenured Member 20 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 10,091
Likes: 34
From: Redmond, WA
Originally Posted by Turbo 3
are you planning on staying naturally aspirated?
At this point, no, but that could change.

Originally Posted by wptrx7
Is it me or does the L76 intake mani have a lower profile than the LS7?
The L76 is very similar to the LS2 intake, except for the port shape and location, and (I believe, don't quote me) larger throttle body opening. It has a 90mm opening like the LS7.

Is that the new cradle that you are developing?
Yep. Almost done.

How is the new house going? that 47" must be for the garage and not the media room I hope, LOL.
It's going in the room with the pool table and MAME cabinet, to watch when the 119" screen is rolled up.

Because you had your thread deleted, your post count went down?
Correct. So did the post count of everyone else who posted in that thread.

Originally Posted by kwman
Hopefully we'll see you over on the V8RX7forum
I'm over there, but just not posting. We'll see how it goes.

Originally Posted by gnx7
I'll wager you go with the LS7 stuff
I'll wager I don't. BTW, when are you going to posts pics of your engine?
Reply
Old Apr 11, 2007 | 09:45 AM
  #20  
kwman's Avatar
I Hate traction
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 173
Likes: 0
From: Wilmington NC
OFF TOPIC: Oh, and congrats on the Vista stuff BTW , your name is plastered all over the website.
Reply
Old Apr 15, 2007 | 04:24 PM
  #21  
digitalsolo's Avatar
RX-347
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,115
Likes: 1
From: Fort Wayne, IN
What do you think of the L92 castings? Mine were some of the best OEM casting I've seen, especially from GM.

Did you take the L76/LS7 pictures? I hadn't seen a direct comparison between them like that before. Thanks for posting those.

One more... (and I may be blind and missed this). Staying with the dry sump?
Reply
Old Apr 16, 2007 | 01:19 PM
  #22  
jimlab's Avatar
Thread Starter
Super Snuggles
Tenured Member 20 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 10,091
Likes: 34
From: Redmond, WA
Originally Posted by digitalsolo
What do you think of the L92 castings? Mine were some of the best OEM casting I've seen, especially from GM.
Very nice castings. They look like an aftermarket head before CNC combustion chamber clean-up.

Did you take the L76/LS7 pictures? I hadn't seen a direct comparison between them like that before. Thanks for posting those.
Yep, all my pictures. When I get a chance, I'll measure the intake runner length. I think that despite first appearances, the L76 might have longer runners.

One more... (and I may be blind and missed this). Staying with the dry sump?
Don't know. Since I won't be road racing, it's not really an issue I'm worried about at the moment. Still trying to decide how many cubes and how low my compression ratio should be.
Reply
Old Apr 16, 2007 | 04:13 PM
  #23  
digitalsolo's Avatar
RX-347
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,115
Likes: 1
From: Fort Wayne, IN
Originally Posted by jimlab
...how low my compression ratio should be.
How low, as in 10.5, or how low, as in 8.5?
Reply
Old Apr 16, 2007 | 04:28 PM
  #24  
jimlab's Avatar
Thread Starter
Super Snuggles
Tenured Member 20 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 10,091
Likes: 34
From: Redmond, WA
Originally Posted by digitalsolo
How low, as in 10.5, or how low, as in 8.5?
8.5ish.
Reply
Old Apr 16, 2007 | 04:47 PM
  #25  
digitalsolo's Avatar
RX-347
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,115
Likes: 1
From: Fort Wayne, IN
Originally Posted by jimlab
8.5ish.
Ahhh, that leads to the question, belt or exhaust gas driven?
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:28 PM.