here R my dyno numbers

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

11-12-06, 01:53 PM

#26

RotaryEvolution

Sharp Claws

iTrader: (30)

Join Date: Oct 2003

Location: Central Florida

Posts: 5,107

Likes: 0

Received 41 Likes on 40 Posts

way to bring this thread off track...

Reply Like

11-12-06, 01:59 PM

#27

Improved FD

Banned. I got OWNED!!!

Join Date: Oct 2005

Location: NC

Posts: 822

Likes: 0

Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

faster on naws or not, comparing a C6 to an F body is like comparing an F-16 to a float plane

sleek and sexy vs. bulbous and ponderous

Reply Like

11-13-06, 02:22 PM

#28

jacobcartmill

just dont care.

iTrader: (6)

Join Date: Jul 2002

Location: Nashville, TN

Posts: 9,387

Likes: 0

Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

those numbers are low.

as someone else stated, you should be at 375whp or so at 15psi

Reply Like

11-13-06, 07:01 PM

#29

matty

Eats, Sleeps, Dreams Rotary

Join Date: Mar 2001

Location: CT

Posts: 4,923

Likes: 0

Received 22 Likes on 14 Posts

Quote:

Originally Posted by 02ws6

A stock LS1 has more torque than that. lol im just messin with ya. Thought i would shake things up a bit. Nice numbers BTW.

a ws6 would get eaten by several buss lengths by that car.

"lolim just messin with ya. Thought i would shake things up a bit."

550rwhp in a ws6 aint **** enough to come on here talking **** bro. most single turbos would eat your **** up.

anyways...what kind of traps are u running?

Last edited by matty; 11-13-06 at 07:08 PM.

Reply Like

11-13-06, 07:49 PM

#30

GoodfellaFD3S

Original Gangster/Rotary!

iTrader: (213)

Join Date: Mar 2001

Location: FL-->NJ/NYC again!

Posts: 30,529

Likes: 524

Received 539 Likes on 326 Posts

Ah, matty stirs the pot again....kills section kinda slow

Reply Like

11-14-06, 10:28 AM

#31

matty

Eats, Sleeps, Dreams Rotary

Join Date: Mar 2001

Location: CT

Posts: 4,923

Likes: 0

Received 22 Likes on 14 Posts

Quote:

Originally Posted by GoodfellaFD3S

Ah, matty stirs the pot again....kills section kinda slow

f him!

Reply Like

12-12-06, 10:56 PM

#32

Goukid2

Senior Member

Join Date: Apr 2006

Location: Brooklyn New York

Posts: 474

Likes: 0

Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

lol

Reply Like

12-13-06, 01:11 AM

#33

mirabile

Rotary Enthusiast

Join Date: May 2006

Location: Ambler,PA

Posts: 1,406

Likes: 0

Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Quote:

Originally Posted by matty

f him!

+1 haha

Reply Like

12-14-06, 09:14 PM

#34

teamsoy

Junior Member

Join Date: Dec 2006

Location: fla

Posts: 12

Likes: 0

Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

just settle it...him on his bottle and you 60-160 hmm i wonder who would win

Reply Like

12-29-06, 01:03 PM

#35

adictd2b00st

boost > *

Join Date: Aug 2004

Location: buffalo, ny

Posts: 1,527

Likes: 0

Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Quote:

Originally Posted by jacobcartmill

those numbers are low.

as someone else stated, you should be at 375whp or so at 15psi

so with 15 less "or so" whp, his numbers are low? you do realise also that not every dyno reads the same? sounds like he's pretty close to the norm to me

Reply Like

01-01-07, 05:03 AM

#36

windom

exhaust overheat

iTrader: (1)

Join Date: Nov 2005

Location: La Crosse, WI

Posts: 558

Likes: 0

Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Let me guess, more Florida trolls?

Attached Thumbnails

Reply Like

01-01-07, 02:03 PM

#37

BASTARD

iTrader: (4)

Join Date: Dec 2003

Location: NorCal

Posts: 2,281

Likes: 0

Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

without knowing whether the motor is ported or not and if it's running on pump fuel. I would say those numbers are pretty good...

Oh... and 02ws6 don't take this personally but that Trans Am is one of the F'ing ugliest car on the street