Suspension/Wheels/Tires/Brakes

Which tires to get....hmmm

Old Sep 28, 2004 | 07:40 PM
  #1  
sectachrome's Avatar
Thread Starter
pistons=teh suck
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 933
Likes: 0
From: NJ
Which tires to get....hmmm

i need a fairly cheap price (under 70 bucks) tire, with good grip, and good tread life. i autox occasionaly. its for a daily driver, that i drive pretty "spiritedly". also since its a DD, it would be nice to have at least some grip in the snow. i was originally looking for just all season tires, but im not sure if i want to sacrifice the dry grip for the few days i have to drive in the snow.

so far im considering:

kuhmo ecsta 711- $52, summer tires



falken ziex ze 512- $54, all season



i was originally planning on getting those falkens, and im still leaning towards them.
Reply
Old Oct 1, 2004 | 08:46 PM
  #2  
BlueRex's Avatar
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 2,444
Likes: 0
From: Bay Area, CA
You autocross your DD?

I doubt these can handle snow, but for my DD I prefer the Yokohama es100's. They're a good value for the price.
Reply
Old Oct 2, 2004 | 02:58 AM
  #3  
cretinx's Avatar
Rotard
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 64
Likes: 0
From: Rochester, NY
the Ziex sucks, majorly.

Toyo TPT rawks in the rain and snow. AVS ES100 is pretty good, but not so hot on snow. Pirelli PZero Nero M+S is a great tire with tons of treadlife (400 rating), so its worth the little extra you pay. If you're looking at 712s you might as well go with the Ecsta Supra MX. If you need snow action, go with the Ecsta Supra ASX.
Reply
Old Oct 3, 2004 | 11:02 AM
  #4  
sectachrome's Avatar
Thread Starter
pistons=teh suck
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 933
Likes: 0
From: NJ
Originally Posted by BlueRex
You autocross your DD?
yes...is that odd?
Reply
Old Oct 3, 2004 | 05:04 PM
  #5  
BlueRex's Avatar
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 2,444
Likes: 0
From: Bay Area, CA
Originally Posted by sectachrome
yes...is that odd?
Nope, just wanted to make sure I understood your post correctly.
Reply
Old Oct 3, 2004 | 05:37 PM
  #6  
sectachrome's Avatar
Thread Starter
pistons=teh suck
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 933
Likes: 0
From: NJ
the es100s have shitty reviews for the most part on tire rack...

the reviews on the ziex 512s have been good...keep in mind this isnt the same tire as the previous ziex model.

Last edited by sectachrome; Oct 3, 2004 at 05:45 PM.
Reply
Old Oct 3, 2004 | 05:50 PM
  #7  
Mahjik's Avatar
Mr. Links
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 27,595
Likes: 43
From: Kansas City, MO
Originally Posted by sectachrome
the es100s have shitty reviews for the most part on tire rack...
You are thinking of the 711's and you think the ES100's are bad?

http://www.tirerack.com/tires/tests/...re_charts.html

You aren't going to find a "great" tire for the money you are looking to spend (if you are looking in the $50-60 per tire range). I'm running the ES100's on my FD (255/40/17's). While they aren't the grippiest things on th planet, they aren't bad (better than the crappy Goodyears I replaced). Sidewalls aren't all that stiff but you aren't going to find a tire with a stiff sidewall at that price anyways.

If you plan to AutoX with the tires, I would recommend spending a little more money on a better tire (something like Toyo Proxes T1-S). I have a separate set of track rims so the ES100's do what I need on the street.
Reply
Old Oct 3, 2004 | 05:53 PM
  #8  
BlueRex's Avatar
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 2,444
Likes: 0
From: Bay Area, CA
Originally Posted by sectachrome
the es100s have shitty reviews for the most part on tire rack...
I seriously doubt that. But like I said I use them on my DD with no problems, but then again I don't autocross my DD so maybe you should up your budget and get something a little better.
Reply
Old Oct 4, 2004 | 07:07 AM
  #9  
DamonB's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 9,617
Likes: 8
From: Dallas
The 711 is by far the worst of all tires mentioned so far.
Reply
Old Oct 4, 2004 | 01:55 PM
  #10  
adam c's Avatar
Cheap Bastard
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 8,368
Likes: 50
From: San Luis Obispo, Ca
Originally Posted by BlueRex
I seriously doubt that. But like I said I use them on my DD with no problems, but then again I don't autocross my DD so maybe you should up your budget and get something a little better.
I wrote a shitty review for the ES100s on the tire rack. I'm sure there are many others. I wound up sending them back. I now have the Bridgestone 750, which is a huge improvement, especially for a tire that is considered to be in the same category as the ES100.
Reply
Old Oct 4, 2004 | 02:29 PM
  #11  
ptrhahn's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 9,282
Likes: 703
From: Arlington, VA
Spend more money and get something decent. I learned alot of good lessons this year on how tires affect your car. I don't think theres a single other thing you can change that will make as much difference...good or bad... than a set of tires.
Reply
Old Oct 4, 2004 | 07:19 PM
  #12  
BlueRex's Avatar
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 2,444
Likes: 0
From: Bay Area, CA
Originally Posted by adam c
I wrote a shitty review for the ES100s on the tire rack. I'm sure there are many others. I wound up sending them back. I now have the Bridgestone 750, which is a huge improvement, especially for a tire that is considered to be in the same category as the ES100.
The RE750's are also significantly more then the ES100's (how much more obviously will depend on the wheel size).
Reply
Old Oct 4, 2004 | 09:57 PM
  #13  
adam c's Avatar
Cheap Bastard
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 8,368
Likes: 50
From: San Luis Obispo, Ca
It's true that the 750's are more expensive. The ES100's were unacceptable. I feel strongly that I must have confidence in the tires I ride on. Even if the ES100's were FREE, they were below my minimal standard for performance. That's right, this cheap bastard would not use them even if they were free!!
Reply
Old Oct 4, 2004 | 11:46 PM
  #14  
BlueRex's Avatar
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 2,444
Likes: 0
From: Bay Area, CA
Originally Posted by adam c
It's true that the 750's are more expensive. The ES100's were unacceptable. I feel strongly that I must have confidence in the tires I ride on. Even if the ES100's were FREE, they were below my minimal standard for performance. That's right, this cheap bastard would not use them even if they were free!!
What car were you running the ES100's on? For a car with the performance of an RX-7 I would think twice before putting that tire on. But on my 130hp integra they hold up just fine even with some spirited street driving.

I respect your opinion, but I stand by my statement of the ES100's being the best bang for your buck.
Reply
Old Oct 5, 2004 | 11:50 AM
  #15  
adam c's Avatar
Cheap Bastard
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 8,368
Likes: 50
From: San Luis Obispo, Ca
Originally Posted by BlueRex
What car were you running the ES100's on? For a car with the performance of an RX-7 I would think twice before putting that tire on. But on my 130hp integra they hold up just fine even with some spirited street driving.

I respect your opinion, but I stand by my statement of the ES100's being the best bang for your buck.

The ES100s were for the FD. I have driven on many Yokohama tires over the years, and was very surprised when this tire didn't live up to expectations. I expected it to perform better than my worn out Bridgestone 730s. From the articles I read, they were supposed to be in the same category. The ES100 performed like an inexpensive tire. I was just expecting more.
Reply
Old Oct 5, 2004 | 04:06 PM
  #16  
BlueRex's Avatar
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 2,444
Likes: 0
From: Bay Area, CA
Originally Posted by adam c
The ES100s were for the FD. I have driven on many Yokohama tires over the years, and was very surprised when this tire didn't live up to expectations. I expected it to perform better than my worn out Bridgestone 730s. From the articles I read, they were supposed to be in the same category. The ES100 performed like an inexpensive tire. I was just expecting more.
Ahhh, I think I understand your disatisfaction now. I would not expect the ES100's to perform to the same standards as the mid class Bridgestone tires priced $30+ more.

I agree that any tire you're going to put on the 7 should have much better traction. I myself prefer the S-03 pole positions. They're expensive, but deliver on performance.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
rx7jocke
Suspension/Wheels/Tires/Brakes
72
Jun 17, 2016 03:48 AM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:05 AM.